Youโre in for a treat in 2030.
03.02.2026 03:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@timbrock.bsky.social
JavaScript. Photography. Wine Gums.
Youโre in for a treat in 2030.
03.02.2026 03:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0London Underground*
02.02.2026 16:12 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0If the announcer on the underground says โThe front two doors at the next station will not openโโฆ how many doors wonโt open?
02.02.2026 16:11 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0If you get resoundingly rejected at one election it would make little sense to keep all the same policies at the next one. The older generations said โwe donโt want youโre offeringโ in 2019 so Labour didnโt offer it again in 2024.
02.02.2026 11:55 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I think you miss my point: pledges for one election donโt rollover to the next.
02.02.2026 03:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Sounds like the Stranger Things finale.
01.02.2026 20:25 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Take me down to the Parallax city where the far moves slow and the near moves quickly
01.02.2026 15:40 โ ๐ 16244 ๐ 4695 ๐ฌ 93 ๐ 71Wasnโt in the manifesto, though there were definitely some MPs lining up for photoshoots.
01.02.2026 15:28 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0And, most significantly, when it was part of a Labour election campaign in 2019, people of Waspi age rejected Labour overwhelmingly.
01.02.2026 15:15 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0So a fifty-year lead-in to any change to the pension benefit? Ridiculous. That doesnโt happen for any other state benefit, and for good reason.
01.02.2026 15:11 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It seemed poorly thought through.
31.01.2026 11:31 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Todayโs UX fail: trying to take a photo for an eVisa but not being able to see the instructions because youโre required to take your glasses off and youโre hopelessly shortsighted. Not very accessible.
31.01.2026 10:33 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0You said they โpromisedโ, but a photoshoot is not a promise.
30.01.2026 08:57 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Ok. Apologies for being a bit blunt earlier. Thereโs some people that treat young people with contempt but youโre clearly not one of them.
29.01.2026 23:23 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Well aside from โnothingโ being entirely fair, the Waspi cohort resoundingly rejected the pledge for compensation from the Labour party at 2019 election in favour of living out their Brexit fantasy. It wasnโt in the 2024 Labour manifesto.
29.01.2026 22:12 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0On this I think we agree. But the point being made is itโs not just that older generations have had time to accrue more wealth, they had opportunities younger generations donโt. Compensating people because they didnโt get to retire at 60 from pockets of those who wonโt get to retire until 70 = wrong
29.01.2026 22:09 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm referring to the fact people work every bit as hard as they used to!
29.01.2026 21:54 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The Waspi generation rejected the Labour pledge in 2019 in favour of Get Brexit Done.
29.01.2026 21:52 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Iโm sure you know your family situation and Iโm sure they all worked very hard. But the idea that this is why the elder generations have most of the wealth is completely false.
29.01.2026 21:46 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The robbing pensioners have been foiled.
29.01.2026 21:40 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0You should not have made those promises.
29.01.2026 21:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0They were told.
29.01.2026 21:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0You can disagree but you are wrong.
29.01.2026 21:35 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Not compensating people because they didnโt get to retire at 60 from the pockets of people who will be lucky to get to retire at 70 sounds like excellent morals to me.
29.01.2026 21:33 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 02019: when the public, especially the more elderly, resoundingly rejected Labour in favour of getting Brexit done.
29.01.2026 21:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0They havenโt though.
29.01.2026 21:30 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Irrelevant seeing as it wasnโt pledged in the 2024 election.
29.01.2026 21:15 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Except the pledge was for the 2019 election where they were roundly rejected.
29.01.2026 21:13 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Are these ordered by text width?
28.01.2026 17:24 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0You canโt have a fifty year lead-in to changing the pension age. Itโs already be out of date twenty years before it came into being.
27.01.2026 22:21 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0