Julian Allen

Farage’s evidence that Muslims want to takeover London: Wait for it. Taxi drivers. In Buckinghamshire. I’ve heard taxi drivers tell me lampposts are watching us, Covid was a scam and Aston Villa will win the premier league!!

Muchas gracias.

Conwy, 2025.

#blackandwhite #blackandwhitephotography #bnw #streetphotographer #ThePhotoHour #photographer #photography

The Reform UK conference gives a standing ovation to "special guest" Lucy Connolly, who pled guilty to stirring up racial hatred after she called for asylum hotels to be set on fire with people inside them.

Met these two on the beach today. They had an incredible stillness about them.

#blackandwhitephoto #blackandwhitephotography #noir #bnw #monochrome #ThePhotoHour #blackandwhite #photography #streetphotography

That’s quite a leap you’ve made there and seem to be projecting an argument I’ve not made. You crack on arguing with yourself.

I was wondering how long it would take you to divert with a case of whataboutery, but wasn’t expecting it quite so soon. Couldn’t we have discussed the point of the article for a bit longer first?

I listened to the police inspector talk about this on R4 a couple of days ago. It didn’t seem like a PR exercise to me. Anything being done to tackle misogynistic behaviour in individuals before it potentially escalates to sexual assault can only be a good thing.

Quite right. We should let yobbos do what they want.

I don’t think Harrogate answers questions.

The latest Panorama program presents an analysis of the prosecution and defence evidence given at the trial. Equal amount of time is given to both sides. She expresses doubts with both.

You seem to be assuming she’s biased in her reporting. In which parts of the book has she not been independent?

No, that’s not what I’m saying.

Because in legal terms, new evidence needs to be presented. Not someone’s opinion of previously presented evidence at trial.

And we’re back to where we were a few posts ago.

Ever get the feeling you’re going round in circles?

A dislodged tube is evidence, as presented at trial, regardless of who moved it. Someone’s opinion of how it became dislodged is not evidence, unless it is given in court.

The current “experts” giving their opinion at a press conference or in a documentary is not evidence. They are not under oath.

It’s an opinion. The evidence is a dislodged tube.

Well, exactly. But in this case, there is no new evidence. It’s a different opinion of existing evidence that was presented at trial.

Did any involve a UK serial killer?

The press have always sensationalised crimes. Harold Shipman, Rose West, Peter Sutcliffe. Do you think those are worth another look?

Why is it irrelevant?

Miscarriages of justice do occur, but my point is when was the last time it happened for a UK serial killer?

To be fair, it’s a good way of deflecting from the question about miscarriages of justice.

I’ve read it.

I prosecute and defend the most serious sexual offences in our courts.

The overwhelming majority of offenders are British-born. Overwhelmingly the victim is someone known to them, either a partner or relative.

Anybody purporting to care about protecting women might start there.

When was the last miscarriage of justice involving a UK serial killer?

I need real-time information on the ethnicity and migration status of guys charged with raping children so I know whether to start a riot or sit back and not give a fuck.

That was polite. See, you can do it.

I think you’re projecting.

Her supporters are always so polite. It’s almost as if they can’t argue her case rationally.

You’ve posted 103 previous times to this 🤣