Graham McVicker's Avatar

Graham McVicker

@grahammcvicker.bsky.social

Associate Professor at the Salk Institute

87 Followers  |  117 Following  |  12 Posts  |  Joined: 29.11.2024  |  2.2007

Latest posts by grahammcvicker.bsky.social on Bluesky

This is the preprint write up of my sabbatical work with Dave Kelley’s group at Calico. We tried out several transformer replacements for multi-task learning in functional genomics (i.e. what Borzoi does). Mamba, in particular, seems to outperform a mini version of Borzoi, especially when β€œstriped”.

18.02.2025 04:17 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Comprehensive dissection of cis-regulatory elements in a 2.8 Mb topologically associated domain in six human cancers - Nature Communications The oncogene MYC plays a key role in cancer initiation and progression. Using thousands of CRISPR perturbations, the authors investigate regulators of MYC in six different cancers. These tumor-specifi...

Comprehensive dissection of cis-regulatory elements in a 2.8 Mb topologically associated domain in six human cancers

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

16.02.2025 10:34 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Contribution of autosomal rare and de novo variants to sex differences in autism Autism is four times more prevalent in males than females. To study whether this reflects a difference in genetic predisposition attributed to autosom…

Our new paper about rare variant contributions to sex differences in autism is out at AJHG, led by Mahmoud Koko with @vw1234.bsky.social and Kyle Satterstrom. Biggest analysis of exome data in autism to date including SPARK and ASC. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

16.02.2025 12:29 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Can DNA sequence models predict mutations affecting human traits?

We introduce TraitGym, a curated benchmark of causal regulatory variants for 113 Mendelian & 83 complex traits, and evaluate functional genomics and DNA language models. Joint work w/ GΓΆkcen Eraslan and @yun-s-song.bsky.social πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡

13.02.2025 20:57 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2
On-target edit events detected for different cell types (K562, primary T cells, GM12878, Jurkats) and guides using TIDE. Most tested guides resulted in efficient insertions of the 34bp donor sequence containing the T7 promoter.

On-target edit events detected for different cell types (K562, primary T cells, GM12878, Jurkats) and guides using TIDE. Most tested guides resulted in efficient insertions of the 34bp donor sequence containing the T7 promoter.

Superb-seq is also EASY TO PERFORM. Protocol uses standard kits, equipment, and NO virus. We also provide free software, SHERIFF, to analyze Superb-seq data. We hope this will enable wide-spread adoption and use in diverse cell types!

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Superb-seq could be used to readily distinguish benign from potentially risky Cas9 off-target edit profiles for therapeutic applications. Perturb-seq and Guide-seq lack this capability, since they do not jointly detect edit sites and transcriptomes at single cell resolution.

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Guide presence is an unreliable indicator of on-target guide editing. Other methods that use guide-only read outs may be confounded by off-target edits that are sometimes even more frequent than the on-target edit.

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Edit events colored by the corresponding guide. Only one guide had no detected off target events. Y-axis shows homology between genome and guide spacer. X/I/O indicates whether edit is exonic, intronic, or intergenic. Most off-target edits are intronic.

Edit events colored by the corresponding guide. Only one guide had no detected off target events. Y-axis shows homology between genome and guide spacer. X/I/O indicates whether edit is exonic, intronic, or intergenic. Most off-target edits are intronic.

All off-targets were non-coding, so paired scRNA-seq was crucial to determine their functional effects using differential expression, as shown for the USP9X intronic edit above.

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Venn diagram showing overlap between off-target edit sites identified with Superb-seq and those predicted by in silico tools Cas-OFFinder, COSMID and E-CRISP. The overlap is poor and 11 off-targets were not predicted by any computational tool.

Venn diagram showing overlap between off-target edit sites identified with Superb-seq and those predicted by in silico tools Cas-OFFinder, COSMID and E-CRISP. The overlap is poor and 11 off-targets were not predicted by any computational tool.

Many of the off-target edit sites (total = 36) were not predicted by popular in silico tools. These tools appear to underestimate the tolerance of guide bulges and mismatches with off-target edit sites, yet also predict many off-target edits that do not occur.

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Pairwise alignments of SMARCA4 g22 sequence and the genome site at the edit. All off-target sites have PAMS, but have various mismatches to the guide spacer sequence.

Pairwise alignments of SMARCA4 g22 sequence and the genome site at the edit. All off-target sites have PAMS, but have various mismatches to the guide spacer sequence.

Off-target sites had clear guide homology and PAMs. There was however a surprising tolerance of guide bulges and mismatches with off-targets, including mismatches in the β€œseed” region.

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Detected edits for SMARCA4 guide 22. 13 edits were detected. Y axis is the frequency of the edit (number of cells) and X axis is the homology between the genome and the guide spacer sequence. Some off target events are more frequent than the intended on-target.

Detected edits for SMARCA4 guide 22. 13 edits were detected. Y axis is the frequency of the edit (number of cells) and X axis is the homology between the genome and the guide spacer sequence. Some off target events are more frequent than the intended on-target.

One guide had an off-target edit that was 34x more frequent than the on-target edit! A total of 5 off-target sites were observed in more cells than the on-target for this particular guide.

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Sheriff counts edit alleles per cell at each edit site. An off-target edit within the first intron of USP9X is associated with differential expression of USP9X and >100 downstream genes.

Sheriff counts edit alleles per cell at each edit site. An off-target edit within the first intron of USP9X is associated with differential expression of USP9X and >100 downstream genes.

We quantified Cas9 edits per cell (β€˜edited alleles’), and associated edit alleles with gene expression. One intronic off-target edit perturbed the expression of USP9X and >100 downstream genes!

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Genome positions and frequencies (number of cells) of on and off-target events detected with Superb-seq.

Genome positions and frequencies (number of cells) of on and off-target events detected with Superb-seq.

SURPRISING RESULT. We applied Superb-seq to 10k K562 cells and detected pervasive off-target Cas9 edits, with an average of 6 off-target sites per guide, ranging in frequency from 0.03-18.6% of cells!

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
A schematic of Superb-seq showing 3 steps: (1) edit labeling with donor sequence containing T7 promoter; (2) In situ transcription with T7 polymerase; (3) combinatorial single-cell RNA-seq + computational analysis with Sheriff.

A schematic of Superb-seq showing 3 steps: (1) edit labeling with donor sequence containing T7 promoter; (2) In situ transcription with T7 polymerase; (3) combinatorial single-cell RNA-seq + computational analysis with Sheriff.

Superb-seq detects edits and cell RNA by labelling nuclease cleavage sites with homology-free insertion of a T7 promoter, followed by β€œZombie” in situ transcription with T7-pol to generate edit-site marking barcoded RNA. T7 and cell RNAs are jointly read out with scRNA-seq.

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Unlike single-cell Perturb/CROP-seq methods that read guide RNAs as a proxy of edits, Superb-seq captures edit events directly. This enables functional assessment of edits including off-target events that confound analyses and raise gene therapy risk.

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Joint single-cell profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 edits and transcriptomes reveals widespread off-target events and their effects on gene expression A longstanding barrier in genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 has been the inability to measure Cas9 edit outcomes and their functional effects at single-cell resolution. Here we present Superb-seq , ...

Excited to announce our preprint describing SUPERB-SEQ 🦸, a new method to measure Cas9 edits and their effects on gene expression in single cells. Led by @micklorenzini.bsky.social and @bradbalderson.bsky.social www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

11.02.2025 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
The distribution of highly deleterious variants across human ancestry groups A major focus of human genetics is to map severe disease mutations. Increasingly that goal is understood as requiring huge numbers of people to be sequenced from every broadly-defined genetic ancestry...

β€œThe distribution of highly deleterious variants across human ancestry groups”. Preprint with Anastasia Stolyarova and @gcbias.bsky.social: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

02.02.2025 19:00 β€” πŸ‘ 131    πŸ” 70    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Efficient count-based models improve power and robustness for large-scale single-cell eQTL mapping Population-scale single-cell transcriptomic technologies (scRNA-seq) enable characterizing variant effects on gene regulation at the cellular level (e.g., single-cell eQTLs; sc-eQTLs). However, existi...

Excited to present our work on developing jaxQTL, a fast single-cell eQTL mapping tool that improves power and robustness in identifying sc-eQTLs using count-based models. See details in threads 🧡
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...

27.01.2025 18:29 β€” πŸ‘ 38    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Leveraging functional annotations to map rare variants associated with Alzheimer's disease with gruyere The increasing availability of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has begun to elucidate the contribution of rare variants (RVs), both coding and non-coding, to complex disease. Multiple RV association tes...

Excited to share our first foray into (noncoding) rare variant association testing: a probabilistic model that learns functional annotation importance and finds associations missed by existing methods. Anjali did a fantastic job with model assessment and scaling! www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...

09.12.2024 17:03 β€” πŸ‘ 39    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

@grahammcvicker is following 20 prominent accounts