Toby Handfield's Avatar

Toby Handfield

@tobyhandfield.bsky.social

Evolution of moral cognition and cooperation. Bit of epistemology, too

537 Followers  |  176 Following  |  3 Posts  |  Joined: 23.01.2024  |  1.5792

Latest posts by tobyhandfield.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Max Noichl | Philosophical Easter Eggs Some eggsamples from the recent philosophical literature.

Some philosophical easter eggs... πŸŒ·πŸŒΌπŸ‡https://www.maxnoichl.eu/blog/2025/easter-eggs/

20.04.2025 15:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Reluctant Altruism: Underlying Mechanisms and Global Variations Altruistic decisions are central to civic engagement and humanitarian efforts. However, altruistic behavior is often context-dependent rather than con…

"reluctant altruism represents a fundamental aspect of human social behavior... the evidence points to reluctant altruism being guilt-driven"

19.07.2025 22:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œwidely adopted practices like senior-last positioning and alphabetical ordering may function as institutional frictions that impede valuable scientific collaborations rather than neutral organizational conventions, potentially reducing overall scientific productivity across affected disciplines”

16.07.2025 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Evolution of Scientific Credit: When Authorship Norms Impede Collaboration Scientific authorship norms vary dramatically across disciplines, from contribution-sensitive systems where first author is the greatest contributor and subsequent author order reflects relative input...

New preprint from @tobyhandfield.bsky.social and me!

We analyze authorship order norms from two perspectives: (1) why do disciplines have different norms and (2) do those different norms affect what kinds of collaborations take place.

arxiv.org/abs/2507.07364

14.07.2025 15:38 β€” πŸ‘ 38    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3
Studying Philosophy Does Make People Better Thinkers | Journal of the American Philosophical Association | Cambridge Core Studying Philosophy Does Make People Better Thinkers

Big iff true.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

14.07.2025 05:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Evolution of Scientific Credit: When Authorship Norms Impede Collaboration Scientific authorship norms vary dramatically across disciplines, from contribution-sensitive systems where first author is the greatest contributor and subsequent author order reflects relative input...

Here's the aforementioned paper.

arxiv.org/abs/2507.07364

14.07.2025 05:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Dave Chalmers and the best argument for dualism #ASSC28

09.07.2025 08:59 β€” πŸ‘ 62    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 2

Here's a start to a mathematical philosophers starter pack. I'm having a hard time keeping track of who is here these days. Apologies if I missed you. Let me know if you want to be added or removed, or if you know anyone else who should be on here.

23.11.2024 17:41 β€” πŸ‘ 159    πŸ” 48    πŸ’¬ 26    πŸ“Œ 3
LPS Summer Development Program – August 11th to 15th, 2025

Undergrads interested in philosophy of science? Please share that applications are open for our summer development program! lpssdp.com?fbclid=IwY2x...

20.03.2025 03:35 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 25    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Abstract: There is by now a considerable amount of theoretical research on the evolutionary foundations of human motivation, or preferences. In the first part of this talk I will present a result which points to a particular class of preferences, which under general conditions combines a certain kind of pro-social concern (a Kantian moral concern) with a certain kind of anti-social concern (spite). The result further suggests that these two motivations go hand in hand. In the second part I will present experimental evidence based on simple designs that enable disentangling these motivations.

Abstract: There is by now a considerable amount of theoretical research on the evolutionary foundations of human motivation, or preferences. In the first part of this talk I will present a result which points to a particular class of preferences, which under general conditions combines a certain kind of pro-social concern (a Kantian moral concern) with a certain kind of anti-social concern (spite). The result further suggests that these two motivations go hand in hand. In the second part I will present experimental evidence based on simple designs that enable disentangling these motivations.

Cooperation Colloquium this week:

Ingela Alger (@ingelaalger.bsky.social)

On the co-existence of morality and spite: Evolutionary theory and experimental evidence

Friday Feb 28, 15:00 UTC+1 (Vienna) / 9 am NYC

Sign up: list.ku.dk/postorius/li...

24.02.2025 08:07 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

"Sure, the last 1000 grad students failed to solve the problem of induction, but that's no reason to think I can't do it."

26.11.2024 21:16 β€” πŸ‘ 34    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 2

Ever the cheery one! πŸ˜‰

25.11.2024 06:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Here is my start! I'm having a hard time keeping track of who is here these days. Apologies if I missed you. Let me know if you want to be added or removed, or if you know anyone else who should be on here.

23.11.2024 17:42 β€” πŸ‘ 47    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 0

@tobyhandfield is following 20 prominent accounts