Olly Wright

Logged into X and it decided the first 20 posts I should see are all from Republican politicians. I’m neither American nor right wing. Elon must have hit the panic button for the algorithm.

Recession and trade war risks class war. Ear the rich

Well they removed the formerly always present stock ticker from the bottom of the screen. So… make like an ostrich? A special report on border security it is.

I’m curious what it means for Paizo fans not in the US. Can we get our books shipped direct from China to avoid tariffs? I have no idea how that works. It does very much suck.

We do. Golarion is our happy place. Thank you

Feels to me like a deliberate distraction. They must be trying to pass a $4 trillion tax cut for billionaires and not want that to be talked about.

Is there such a thing as a pre written sandbox campaign? The book you might use for a sandbox game is a setting book not an adventure.

“I thought Trump with his business acumen would…”

Mistake made

European companies returning to Russia better have their crisis PR team ready to handle the backlash and desertion by customers they’ll experience.

It wasn’t though because it would be completely inaccurate if it was

Just undo Brexit. The world has changed since then.

He who saves his country violates no laws.

Now would be a perfect moment for a high profile Netflix historical drama based on the French Revolution. A reminder of what can happen to oligarchs that are too greedy.

America has to pull out its troops to prepare for inevitably losing its future misguided war with China. Europe can and will guard its eastern border just fine without an American presence.

It shouldn’t be a red line. It’s exactly what’s needed. Silly politicians tying themselves on knots over this issue. Brexit was a massive mistake and now 80%+ admit it.

Hand embroidered decor of the very hungry caterpillar with the phrase ‘eat the rich’ placed on top of the book

on tuesday he ate through two tech bros. but he was still hungry! 🍓🐛 (the ebay auction for this piece is live hehe)

They haven’t earned my trust yet. But I don’t distrust Jesse or Jake either. However based on Jake’s interviews he comes across as honest to me. Which is a good start. The output of Skywatcher is what will matter most, probably.

And lastly, as for the evidence: we were shown how they are going about attempting to gather evidence. Right now Skywatcher and the Gallileo program look to be our two best shots at getting evidence (the government and DoD are not going to do it). Finally some people have a plan to get evidence.

But Jessie is certainly not a grifter and nor is Jake Barber. So using that word just comes across as a bad faith attack. That prevents you getting taken seriously by many who have that work as a red flag.

And lastly you used the word ‘grifters’ which is my red flag for low-effort attempts at character assassination. Which is the main technique used by people pushing disinformation in this space. I saw no ‘grifting’ in the video, although Logan Paul’s separate history seems to fall into that…

You suggest Jessie is not involved in Skywatcher, which is speculation. Given his investment / finance background my speculation is that he’s somehow involved in helping finance it. Logan Paul is clearly a donor.

Jessies Video on Townsend Brown cites ‘the Hunt for Zero point’ directly. Jessie has recommended that book. There is no problem there.

You say ‘apparently jessie is the go to for Townsend Brown!’. The ‘apparently’ gives it a mocking tone. What was said was by Karl Nell saying to a conference crowd that Jesse’s Video is a great first place to look for relevant information. Which it is.

Good. I have a BSC in philosophy with a focus on ethics and philosophy of science. I barely know Logan Paul, that seems to be the main error made in the ‘packaging’ of this, he appears to have a bad reputation. However your other arguments are veryweak i’m afraid. I will be specific:

You don’t, which is my point. Your criticisms don’t relate to the content. The video is an interview of Jake Barber. It’s like you’re criticising a painting because you don’t like the frame whilst ignoring the actual painting.

Those are irrelevant, weak or just bad faith arguments since they don’t have anything to do with Jake Barber and his testimony, which is outstanding. You know why comments were closed: because people reacted negatively to the presence of Logan Paul.

I utterly disagree. They are providing new information and have built a group to go after and record UAPs, which they intend to share. It’s by far the most open approach to this.

My instincts are the same. We really are living in interesting times.