Daniel Leising's Avatar

Daniel Leising

@leising.bsky.social

Psychology Professor at TU Dresden. One of five speakers of Network for Sustainable Research (@nnwiss.bsky.social) [views my own].

813 Followers  |  578 Following  |  347 Posts  |  Joined: 20.11.2023  |  2.0324

Latest posts by leising.bsky.social on Bluesky

Spotlight - Kino im Kasten

Es geht um Verbrechen, und darum, wie Institutionen und die Menschen in ihnen dazu beitragen, dass Verbrechen immer weiter geschehen kΓΆnnen. Ein unverΓ€ndert relevantes und psychologisch hochinteressantes Thema. Der Eintritt ist frei.

www.kino-im-kasten.de/film.html?id...

03.02.2026 12:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Der Oscar-prΓ€mierte Film beruht auf wahren Gegebenheiten: den Recherchen des Investigativteams des Boston Globe zu sexuellen KindesmissbrΓ€uchen in der Katholischen Kirche.

03.02.2026 12:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Morgen Abend (4. Februar) um 19:30 Uhr stelle ich im Dresdner Kino im Kasten den nΓ€chsten Film in unserer Filmreihe zum Thema "IntegritΓ€t" vor. Diesmal zeigen wir "Spotlight" (2015, R: Tom McCarthy).

03.02.2026 12:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Diese Befassung dΓΌrfen dann andere ΓΌbernehmen.

Wer so agiert, der trΓ€gt selbst dazu bei, die Wissenschaft zu diskreditieren und zu delegitimieren. Also: Bitte endlich mal hingucken. Auch wenn's wehtut.

29.01.2026 13:31 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Gewisse Individuen und Institutionen bejubeln einfach immer weiter beharrlich den Wissenschaftsbetrieb, sind sich aber fΓΌr eine Befassung mit dessen teils gravierenden Systemfehlern und dem geradezu grotesken Fehlverhalten mancher Akteure darin offenbar zu fein.

29.01.2026 13:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Die Erkenntnis ist sicher nicht neu, darf aber gerne noch ein bisschen mehr in die Breite getragen werden: Der Wissenschaft dient man vor allem langfristig nicht primΓ€r durch PR.

29.01.2026 13:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
SchwΓ€chen der Wissenschaft: Γ„ndert die Wissenschaft – bevor es die Populisten tun! Gezielt schlachten Wissenschaftsfeinde die SchwΓ€chen des Forschungsbetriebs aus. Der kann sich nur dann schΓΌtzen, wenn er sich endlich mit den eigenen Fehlern befasst.

Ein wichtiger Beitrag von Andreas Sentker in der ZEIT:
www.zeit.de/2026/04/wiss...

29.01.2026 13:31 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I recently discovered @forbetterscience.bsky.social. Follow Leonid for fearless posts about (alleged) cases of harassment in academia. The most recent one: it seems 44 professors wrote an internal letter demanding "protection" for one of their peers, whom several people had accused of harassment.
1/

25.01.2026 21:34 β€” πŸ‘ 47    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Schneider Shorts 23.01.2026 – Marginalised and isolated in academic publishing activities Schneider Shorts 23.01.2026 – German sexual harasser defended by peers, Italian cheater defended by former mentor, Daddy’s darling wins in court, antivaxxer loses in court, retractions …

2023 begann man in über sexuellen Mißbrauch in der Geschichtswissenschaft zu diskutieren. #metoohistory verÀnderte den Diskurs. Andreas Kohring musste gehen. Ein weiterer Prof der HU muss sich vor Gericht verantworten, die Uni stellte ihn außer Dienst.
ABER:
forbetterscience.com/2026/01/23/s...

23.01.2026 08:02 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 25    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2

Location: Lecture hall FAL 158 (BΓΌrohaus am Falkenbrunnen, Chemnitzer Strasse 46 b, Dresden). Everybody is welcome.

22.01.2026 08:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As alternative platforms and digital sovereignty for Europe are separately needed, we aim to question the current status quo and explore how this technology offers untapped opportunities for an improved information landscape and participatory democracy lived online.

22.01.2026 08:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

A number of political behaviours appear to be influenced by the use of digital media, such as increasing polarization or declining trust in institutions.

22.01.2026 08:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Increasing interconnectedness has led to more self-organized public debates, platforms and their algorithms have gained new power over discourse, and generative AI has made content fabrication easier than ever.

22.01.2026 08:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Abstract: Information and communication technology has undergone dramatic developments over the last two decades.

22.01.2026 08:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This week, we will have the honour of welcoming Prof. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen (TU Dresden). At 1 pm on Friday (Jan 23rd), he will speak to us about the following topic:

*Digital Sovereignty, but how? A behavioural perspective on alternative social media*

22.01.2026 08:49 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Obituary - FB01 - Uni Kassel

Last week, we lost our dear friend, colleague, and mentor, Cord Benecke, who passed away at the age of 60. We will never forget you, Cord! πŸ’› www.uni-kassel.de/fb01/en/depa...

06.01.2026 12:46 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Frankfurt macht's vor

30.12.2025 09:55 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 30.12.2025 08:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

BΓΆllerverbot. Jetzt.

27.12.2025 10:52 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It is not just that 'ideally' criteria for publication should be the same for significant and non-significant results - it is literally in the code of conduct for research integrity. If you do not act in line with this, you are violating the code of conduct for research integrity.

20.12.2025 05:02 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
How PhD students suffered under years of misconduct by Professor M. A culture of fear, manipulative behaviour, mounting workload, and exploitation of PhD candidates. UT professor M. displayed such a pattern for years, an investigation by U-Today reveals. Last year, UT...

www.utoday.nl/spotlight/76...

15.12.2025 07:33 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You have been cancelled. So

04.12.2025 11:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The talk is associated with our Master's program "Human Performance in Socio-Technical Systems (HPSTS)", but open to the public.

Language: German

Venue: Bürohaus am Falkenbrunnen (Chemnitzer Straße 46b), FAL 158

Time: Dec 12th, 1:00 pm

01.12.2025 09:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Public Talk: Introduction to Investigative Journalism

On December 12th (Friday), we will have the honor of hosting Mr Nico Schmidt. Mr Schmidt works as an investigative journalist and will share his experiences with, and his perspective on, this type of professional activity.

01.12.2025 09:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The next important step on this journey will be to develop clearer theoretical ideas of the individual descriptor properties, and of the ways in which they are functionally related to one another. Exciting, but challenging. We're working on it...

27.11.2025 08:25 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Despite their (current) shortcomings, LLM-based ratings of descriptor properties may soon help us overcome this grave limitation because *any set of items* (e.g., from an already published study) may be easily assessed this way, a posteriori.

27.11.2025 08:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

However, to this day, most psychometric research still ignores them, making data analyses a lot less informative than they could be.

27.11.2025 08:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Descriptor properties have been the subject of psychological research for decades, including seminal contributions by (e.g.) Edwards (1953), Funder & Dobroth (1987), and John & Robins (1993).

27.11.2025 08:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Going beyond previous work, we also used LLM-based ratings of the same properties, finding that they resemble human-based ratings quite a bit, but should not (yet) be treated as being entirely interchangeable with them.

27.11.2025 08:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Using a new sample of participants who generated a new sample of terms, most of the previous findings that we targeted were indeed replicated (e.g., the pattern of correlations among the six descriptor properties).

27.11.2025 08:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@leising is following 20 prominent accounts