Eike Mark Rinke's Avatar

Eike Mark Rinke

@emrinke.bsky.social

Politics, Media, and Open Scholarship @universityofleeds.bsky.social | Co-Director @cdpleeds.bsky.social | Leeds Local Network Lead @ukrepro.bsky.social | AE @polcommjournal.bsky.social ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5330-7634

774 Followers  |  949 Following  |  33 Posts  |  Joined: 02.10.2023  |  1.9873

Latest posts by emrinke.bsky.social on Bluesky


D04: Collecting Data from Large Online Platforms with APIs, Webscraping and DSA applications – MethodsNET

People often ask how to get social media and online platforms' data these days after a lot of them shut down academic access

This course by NoΓ«lle Lebernegg at the @methodsnet.bsky.social summer school gets you covered πŸ‘‡

Registrations open

methodsnet.org/course/d04-c...

05.02.2026 10:32 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Indeed. There is a paper to be written on how journalists make deliberative politics less probable by routinely framing changes of party/politician policy positions as "climbdown", "flip-flopping", etc.

14.01.2026 23:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
ECR Reviewers Platform

Despite Prepublication Peer Review being a core part of science, training materials for it are sparse. This open source guide is very valuable for ECRs!

ecr-reviewers.gitlab.io/guide/

04.12.2025 11:53 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 23    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3

reviewing preprints by writing down discussions we were already having! open review is nice, open review together is nicer (imo)

18.11.2025 19:49 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Transparent and comprehensive statistical reporting is critical for ensuring the credibility, reproducibility, and interpretability of psychological research. This paper offers a structured set of guidelines for reporting statistical analyses in quantitative psychology, emphasizing clarity at both the planning and results stages. Drawing on established recommendations and emerging best practices, we outline key decisions related to hypothesis formulation, sample size justification, preregistration, outlier and missing data handling, statistical model specification, and the interpretation of inferential outcomes. We address considerations across frequentist and Bayesian frameworks and fixed as well as sequential research designs, including guidance on effect size reporting, equivalence testing, and the appropriate treatment of null results. To facilitate implementation of these recommendations, we provide the Transparent Statistical Reporting in Psychology (TSRP) Checklist that researchers can use to systematically evaluate and improve their statistical reporting practices (https://osf.io/t2zpq/). In addition, we provide a curated list of freely available tools, packages, and functions that researchers can use to implement transparent reporting practices in their own analyses to bridge the gap between theory and practice. To illustrate the practical application of these principles, we provide a side-by-side comparison of insufficient versus best-practice reporting using a hypothetical cognitive psychology study. By adopting transparent reporting standards, researchers can improve the robustness of individual studies and facilitate cumulative scientific progress through more reliable meta-analyses and research syntheses.

Transparent and comprehensive statistical reporting is critical for ensuring the credibility, reproducibility, and interpretability of psychological research. This paper offers a structured set of guidelines for reporting statistical analyses in quantitative psychology, emphasizing clarity at both the planning and results stages. Drawing on established recommendations and emerging best practices, we outline key decisions related to hypothesis formulation, sample size justification, preregistration, outlier and missing data handling, statistical model specification, and the interpretation of inferential outcomes. We address considerations across frequentist and Bayesian frameworks and fixed as well as sequential research designs, including guidance on effect size reporting, equivalence testing, and the appropriate treatment of null results. To facilitate implementation of these recommendations, we provide the Transparent Statistical Reporting in Psychology (TSRP) Checklist that researchers can use to systematically evaluate and improve their statistical reporting practices (https://osf.io/t2zpq/). In addition, we provide a curated list of freely available tools, packages, and functions that researchers can use to implement transparent reporting practices in their own analyses to bridge the gap between theory and practice. To illustrate the practical application of these principles, we provide a side-by-side comparison of insufficient versus best-practice reporting using a hypothetical cognitive psychology study. By adopting transparent reporting standards, researchers can improve the robustness of individual studies and facilitate cumulative scientific progress through more reliable meta-analyses and research syntheses.

Our paper on improving statistical reporting in psychology is now online πŸŽ‰

As a part of this paper, we also created the Transparent Statistical Reporting in Psychology checklist, which researchers can use to improve their statistical reporting practices

www.nature.com/articles/s44...

14.11.2025 20:43 β€” πŸ‘ 236    πŸ” 93    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 5
UK Reproducibility Network Local Network Leads engaged in discussion around a table.

UK Reproducibility Network Local Network Leads engaged in discussion around a table.

UK Reproducibility Network is having a conference, July 2026 in Manchester!

Please register your interest: www.ukrn.org/conference/

Bringing together researchers, institutions and research stakeholders from the UK and beyond to drive collaborative change within the UK #research sector.

24.10.2025 10:57 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
"The shift towards more robust research is primarily a social change." Open science is a social change and spreads primarily through communities and networks. Networks offer exchange, social recognition, ...

'The central goals of open science – transparency, social accessibility, robustness – apply across all disciplines.'

In a recent interview, Dr Eike Rinke discussed the importance of open research in improving the quality of research in higher education:

open-science-future.zbw.eu/en/shift-tow...

08.08.2025 08:16 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

*Overstate*, Josh, overstate! (And: yes!)

01.08.2025 21:06 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In which I note that OS is a social movement aimed at better aligning "good" & "successful" research - and shoutout @ukrepro.bsky.social, @reproducibilitea.org & our wonderful librarian allies like @openresleeds.bsky.social

English version here: open-science-future.zbw.eu/en/shift-tow...

31.07.2025 12:36 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Votes at 16: Right Policy, Wrong Motives? Labour has announced plans to allow 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in the next general election. This will bring the UK in line with devolved and local elections in Scotland and Wales. Labour’s propos

We have a new blog post about lowering the voting age to 16 in the UK by @oliver-booth.bsky.social

Check it out πŸ‘‡

22.07.2025 18:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This looks like some good evidence-assessment stuff right here.

30.06.2025 11:10 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Looking forward to this in Leeds tomorrow!

@lida-leeds.bsky.social @srmleeds.bsky.social

23.06.2025 08:22 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science - Communications Psychology Psychology must embrace more responsible practices in design, reporting, generalisation, and evaluation of research to counteract the spectre of Questionable Generalisability Practices and the issue o...

Most weeks I recommend to our Leeds @ukrepro.bsky.social network an "Open Research Friday Reading". Why not share it here, too?

Today I shared "A Manifesto for a Globally DEI Open Science" by @sakshighai.bsky.social et al. - important read for any social scientist ☝️

www.nature.com/articles/s44...

23.05.2025 11:02 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

This morning @helenblomfield.bsky.social and @nickshepp.bsky.social have teamed up with @emrinke.bsky.social to talk about Open Political Research

(Described by @lauracon.bsky.social as an #OpenResearch / data management super group 🀣)

15.05.2025 09:16 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

The Centre for Democratic Politics is also on LinkedIn!

Follow our page for information about upcoming events and research.

08.05.2025 16:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The reliability of replications: a study in computational reproductions | Royal Society Open Science This study investigates researcher variability in computational reproduction, an activity for which it is least expected. Eighty-five independent teams attempted numerical replication of results from ...

Dr Eike Rinke and co-authors have had their article on 'The reliability of replications' published by The Royal Society πŸ“ƒ

In it, @emrinke.bsky.social explores the importance of including clear explanations alongside research results πŸ”

royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...

13.05.2025 09:45 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Open Research for All: Bridging Disciplines Join us at this in-person event (including lunch) on Wednesday 14 May (11:00-14:00, Level 13 Research Meeting Rooms in Edward Boyle library) for several exciting open research...

πŸ“£ New Open Research event at University of Leeds

Open Research for All: Bridging Disciplines πŸŒ‰

Join us at this in-person event (including lunch) on Wed 14 May (11am-2pm) for several exciting OR talks 🌟

Register: leeds.libcal.com/event/4369744

@openresleeds.bsky.social @nickshepp.bsky.social

23.04.2025 10:14 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3

Congrats, @breznaunate.bsky.social @emrinke.bsky.social @kunkakom.bsky.social and team. Taking part in this project was not only eye-opening in terms of #metascience but also great fun. Even with shared data and code, reproducibility is not a given. royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...

14.04.2025 10:38 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Open code and software
YouTube video by UK Reproducibility Network Open code and software

Open code and software encourages collaboration between code users, developers and researchers.

What are your experiences with sharing your code and software?

#OpenResearch #Research #OpenCode #OpenSoftware

02.04.2025 13:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Your regular reminder that the position to only make "the data supporting the findings of this study ... available upon reasonable request" is not (usually) itself reasonable.

(Ugh, when will this practice finally end?)

28.03.2025 16:28 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Do you have recommendations for people who are interested in / have spoken about the problems (practical or ethical) of using AI in social science research?

They need to be UK based. I am organising a panel for an event. Thank you so much!

26.03.2025 17:18 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

An excellent investigation highlighting the value of sharing code, in addition to data, for establishing reproducibility.

20.03.2025 10:20 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

1. For the past thirty years I've had the best job in the world.


I've had the opportunity to follow my curiosity; explore the workings of nature and society; mentor students and junior colleagues in the same process; and teach generations of students about it all.

19.03.2025 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2599    πŸ” 935    πŸ’¬ 38    πŸ“Œ 236

πŸ“Š Large-scale reproducibility experiment out now @royalsocietypublishing.org

☝️Moral of the story: When you publish research results, do it along w/ hi-qual code & clear explanations of what you did. Otherwise they may be less reproducible than you think.

royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...

20.03.2025 11:38 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸš€ The GESIS AppKit is live! πŸš€

Three years ago we started the project of providing "an App" for Social Scientists @gesis.org . Today, it is much more than that. It is a management system for mobile, intensive-longitudinal studies. Interested?

βœ… Register here: www.gesis.org/gesis-appkit...

12.03.2025 07:28 β€” πŸ‘ 52    πŸ” 26    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3

There are concerns that Bluesky's impact has faded since the initial hype. This is false.

That impression results from reading headlines about social media instead of the hard data.

The five HIGHEST points of Bluesky posts mentioning research all occur in the last 2 weeks.

10.03.2025 16:21 β€” πŸ‘ 236    πŸ” 88    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 9

We are trying to build the most ambitious infrastrucutre for democracy research - and we need your support !

03.03.2025 12:08 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This event happening today with us at CDP from 3-4 pm UK time. This is a hybrid, open event, so join us from afar or at Leeds if you are interested to learn more about ClΓ‘udia's work on "Parliamentary Storytelling in Brazil and in the UK".

26.02.2025 13:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Speaking of null results, have a look at this outstanding study by @nicolaiberk.bsky.social, just out with us at Political Communication, where he shows with exemplary rigor how BILD's sudden shift towards framing immigration as related to crime had zero effect on readers' attitudes on immigration.

10.02.2025 18:33 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Our CDP 2024/25 Alice Bacon Lecture with broadcaster and journalist Naga Munchetty will happen tonight! Few tickets left, registration info below. If you're in Leeds, make sure to drop by.

06.02.2025 11:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@emrinke is following 20 prominent accounts