Why is LinkedIn so awful? I can barely stand to be there for more than 10 minutes.
26.11.2025 20:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@blairephd.bsky.social
Dr. B, PhD | Cultural Critic | Writer & Musician
Why is LinkedIn so awful? I can barely stand to be there for more than 10 minutes.
26.11.2025 20:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thank you for this post.
26.11.2025 20:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I've been thinking about this, too. It seems like DT is never held accountable for one unforgiving thing because by the time the news breaks on said thing, he's already done another 20 unforgivable things.
19.11.2025 01:17 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0+1
19.11.2025 00:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Citing DoorDash to prove the American economy is doing well is like using ER waiting-room traffic to prove everyoneβs healthy.
13.11.2025 18:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0George Orwell: "Writing a book is a horrible, exhausting struggle, like a long bout with some painful illness. One would never undertake such a thing if one were not driven on by some demon whom one can neither resist nor understand.β
Here's hoping I can scrape together some PTO.
Election night was great for democrats and fans of the words βrebukeβ and βrepudiationβ
07.11.2025 04:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0penned my thoughts on AI curation, Grok's new role, and so-called 'X refugees'. dr-b.ghost.io/im-not-writi...
27.10.2025 02:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0what makes this feel inevitable: tech follows incentive structures. attention is scarce, automation scales.
what makes it feel weird:
human expression is now mediated by non-human intelligence.
my question is: what kind of content survives? and what gets lost when AI becomes the gatekeeper?
this evolution becomes awkward for someone like me who uses social media to critique tech culture.
if I were still seeking an audience on X, I would have to make THIS THREAD criticizing the fact that I have to appeal to an AI APPEALING to an AI.
now we're in the AI curation phase. on X, that means Grok, an AI reading 100M+ posts daily, decides what's 'interesting'.
you're optimizing for an AI's interpretation of what humans want.
then the algorithms show up and now we're all optimizing.
digital media strategy is king. you're considering the best times to post. hashtag strategies. immediate hooks.
you're not creating for people anymore. you're creating for the machine that shows your content to people.
in early social media, you posted what YOU wanted to say, hoping the right people would find it.
authenticity was the currency; your audience was the judge.
we've gone from: creating for audiences --> to creating for algorithms --> and now, to creating for AI.
this progression feels both inevitable and deeply weird.
π§΅ here are my thoughts
the thing is, these works build the model, informing every single response it generates. $3,000 payment doesn't reflect that ongoing value.
it's like paying a session musician $100 once, then selling millions of albums that include their contribution forever. what about mandatory licensing?
petition to replace doom-scrolling with "taking a scroll"
26.10.2025 18:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'm imagining Jeff Bezos walking around a creepy lair, orating this article with delight to a Post writer as the flames from the nearby fireplace reflect in his eyes.
26.10.2025 18:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0leaving Substack before ever creating a post is barely a revolutionary act.
it feels like half-heartedly saying 'fuck off' to an empty room you never moved into.
nonetheless, hello, @ghost.org
hello, open source. hello, owning my work.
more thoughts here: dr-b.ghost.io/moving-day/