2 girls 2 cats 2 subarus 🏳️‍🌈

NYC Directory Of Resources and Aid A directory of aid resources in NYC

dora.nyc

this is OUTSTANDING. super navigatable directory for food distros, resources. and easy to remember because it’s like the explorer but also—

directory
of
resources &
aid

YouTube video by Sivicks Gaming Cop Slide In The Air Tonight #copslide #philcollins #intheairtonight #drumsolo

Still love this version:
www.youtube.com/shorts/_EqrI...

This is the assignment, ev drivers. You have so many options.

First task, every morning- a meal for everyone. Your local food bank needs you now.
share.google/CMxIa24GlrQa...

Élan.

Remember when they melted all that gold down for her brother?

Fluffy cat in spinal extension, looking like a fluffy rainbow.

Spinal goals.

Find Food Resources in Massachusetts Here is a list of free food assistance programs and resources in Massachusetts.

Not a lawyer, but I'm gonna give her the benefit of the doubt.

Meanwhile - everyone get out there and support your local food banks.

projectbread.org/get-help

After I exhale.

He deserved that.

I had some doubts that it would be worse than what we already know (fkn bad enough) but holy mama, it must be so bad.

Congratulations!

"stares like a zombie while a dude collapses five feet away"

Hunger as a weapon. WTF else does anyone need to know?

"socialize the losses!"

* lesbian raises hand *

Yes, it's creepy. Ew.

Well, my winning streak is broken.

This suit makes me laugh every time I see it

Or escarole and beans.

Watching RFK jr run away from someone collapsing feels like a harbinger of things to come

I thought this quote was parody. It’s real..

Amen. The lengths they are going to to try and strip trans citizens of their humanity, their citizenship, their personal dignity, livelihoods - fucking EVERYTHING - is enraging.

And that any gay org would call themselves "LGB" - saving the hottest spots in hell for you.

This is so true and unsettling.

💙 I love that he wants to take on the challenge of the villain part.

Does anyone remember Mark Meadows?

My god.

Don't bring a box of wine to a food fight, Jeanine.

TRUMP v. ORR JACKSON, J., dissenting identity. From 1992 to 2010, passport applicants who wished to obtain passports with sex markers that were dif- ferent from the sex assigned to them at birth had to submit evidence of surgical reassignment. In 2010, the State De- partment began allowing passport applicants to submit a doctor’s certification avowing that they had undergone clin- ical treatment for gender transition. Beginning in 2021, the State Department allowed applicants to self-select the sex marker that matched their gender identity. Through it all, the indisputable point of a passport re- mained: to “attes[t] to the identity and nationality of the bearer.” 22 CFR §51.1 (2024). The State Department’s sex- marker policies have thus long demonstrated that what is important for identification purposes is the bearer’s gender identity today. No matter. On January 22, 2025, the agency overhauled the rules for sex markers on passports, reverting to its pre- 1992 practices. Its Passport Policy now requires that all new passports reflect the holders’ sex assigned at birth. Why? Because two days earlier, on January 20, President Trump issued Executive Order No. 14168, characterizing transgender identity as “false” and “corrosive” to American society. 90 Fed. Reg. 8615 (2025). The order asserted that “the policy of the United States” is “to recognize two sexes, male and female,” which it defined based on the sex as- signed “at conception.” Ibid. And the order directed the Secretary of State to require that any new government-is- sued identification documents reflect the holder’s “biologi- cal” sex. Id., at 8615–8616. The State Department re- sponded by rescinding its prior sex-identification policies moving forward; transgender Americans who had previ- ously obtained passports with sex markers reflecting their gender identity rather than their sex assigned at birth could continue to use those documents until they expire. Several transgender Americans w

Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 9 JACKSON, J., dissenting President from carrying out these supposedly legitimate ob- jectives. Thus, the Government’s asserted harm from being sub- jected to the injunction—its only asserted harm—is that the President cannot, at least for now, enact his preferred poli- cies regarding sex markers on U. S. passports. Even as- suming, arguendo, that this purported injury counts as ir- reparable harm, it does not suffice to justify the extraordinary equitable remedy of a stay pending appeal.5 What the Government needs (and what it does not have) is an explanation for why it faces harm unless the Presi- dent’s chosen policy is implemented now. It suggests that there is an urgent foreign policy interest in dictating sex markers on passports, but does not elaborate as to what that interest might possibly be. All the Government is able to muster is the statement that “the injunction forces the government to misrepresent the sex of passport holders to foreign nations” and to “contradict . . . biological reality.” Application for Stay of Injunction 34. But how urgent can this interest be when the Passport Policy itself allows transgender Americans who already have passports with sex markers reflecting their current gender identity to con- tinue using those passports until they expire? The Government also insists that gender identity is not a meaningful basis for identification—strangely begging the question why sex markers are required on passports at all.

The Supreme Court's decision to let the Trump White House implement its anti-trans passport policy is vile, and I appreciate Jackson going out of her way to include in her dissent, for the record, the administration's language justifying the policy. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

Don't stand too still, buddy, or you'll end up spray painted gold. 🙄

We know he don't faint at the sight of blood.