Let me guess why.
30.10.2025 02:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@clow.bsky.social
Poet. Editor, The Comstock Review. Rhet/Comp & Historiography. Rural Studies. Linguistics. Multimodal/ Multilingual Acquisition. Disability/Deaf Studies. Educational Equity & Access. Best endorsement to date: my GP reports "Patient is a good historian"
Let me guess why.
30.10.2025 02:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Senator Lisa Murkowski joined Democrats in filing a Supreme Court brief challenging President Donald Trumpβs tariff authority.
29.10.2025 04:51 β π 75 π 31 π¬ 3 π 1THE DAY AHEAD:   After a loss for Trump Admin in court, federal workers nationwide continue their fight
youtube.com/shorts/Zz5i6...
A federal judge rules that the acting U.S. attorney for the Central District of California has been βunlawfully servingβ in the role, in part because the Senate hasnβt confirmed the Trump appointee.
29.10.2025 12:00 β π 83 π 34 π¬ 3 π 1I teamed up to write how:
The Trump administration has provided two - completely irreconcilable - determinations on status of Tren de Aragua and Venezuela regime.
Makes it impossible for judges to defer to 'presidential determination' on Alien Enemies Act. Confounds law and policy.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxtonβs Tylenol lawsuit doesnβt cite credible evidenceβbut it does cite Trump. 
www.dailykos.com/stories/2025...
Abstract This essay, prepared for the 2025 volume of The Supreme Court Review, seeks to provide a holistic account of the Supreme Courtβs behavior on emergency applications relating to the Trump administration during its October 2024 Term. As it demonstrates, the justices in those cases not only flouted the traditional standards for emergency relief; they exhibited repeated and sustained disrespect for both lower courts and Congress, enabling the executive branch to act in defiance of countless statutory restrictions; of settled constitutional understandings; and even of coercive district court mandates, all with dramatic (and deleterious) real-world consequences. As the Alien Enemies Act cases illustrate, the takeaway is not that the Court always ruled for President Trump; it's that it pushed back only when its mandates were on the line. The upshot is an attempt by the Supreme Court to preserve its supremacy, as such. But such an approach, the essay concludes, is likely to be self-defeating. In the short term, it will encourage the executive branch to take ever-more-aggressive actions against both the people and the lower courts. And in the long term, it will not just further weaken Congress and the lower courts; it will further erode public confidence in the judiciary as an institution. Together, the increased power and momentum of the executive and the decreased credibility of (and respect for) the courts will make it that much harder for the Supreme Court to wield the supremacy it's protecting, even when it wants to.
New paper from me offering a holistic assessment of #SCOTUS's behavior on Trump-related emergency applications thus far:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
TL;DR: The ultimate theme of the decisions is a majority bent on preserving *their* supremacy, as suchβwhich is likely to only be self-defeating.
Q: What did you mean when you said you're prepared to send 'more than the National Guard' into American cities?
TRUMP: if I want to enact a certain act, I'd be allowed to do whatever I want. The courts wouldn't get involved. Nobody would. I could send Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines -anybody I want
President Trump nominated two federal prosecutors for district court judgeships in Arkansas and Texas, and an Alaska state lawyer for a judgeship there, sending filled out questionnaires to the Senate without formal announcements reut.rs/3J9B2Ot
29.10.2025 13:32 β π 4 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Not an option for Halligan, who wasn't serving as First Assistant US Attorney when she assumed the job.
apnews.com/article/fede...Β 
Court disqualifies Trump-appointed US attorney from overseeing multiple criminal cases
Here's the full preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration from implementing shutdown-related layoffs (RIFs) at 39 agencies and issuing new notices to federal employees in programs/projects/activities that include members or bargaining units of the unions that sued buff.ly/FZk1OBj
29.10.2025 14:11 β π 90 π 33 π¬ 1 π 1EN BANC: On Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit voted to rehear DOJβs Oregon National Guard TRO stay request en banc by an 11-judge panel, wiping out last weekβs 2-1 order that sided with Trump. 
Hereβs my report at Law Dork on what we know and whatβs coming next:
A coalition of Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit to stop the Trump administration from suspending food aid benefits starting on November 1 amid the ongoing US government shutdown.
Subscribe to The Daily Docket: reut.rs/4aBvwvO
Why some Republicans have major beef with the Trump administration 
Half of all U.S. states are taking the Trump admin. to court over its decision not to fund SNAP benefits for millions of Americans next month. @stephruhle.bsky.social and panel discuss.
WATCH:
If it were any judge besides Carl Nichols (or Trevor McFadden), in the Tyler Taranto case, I might thing creatively about a way to implicate Trump in trying to minimize the criminal penalty for the guy he sicced on a former President.
29.10.2025 15:16 β π 178 π 48 π¬ 5 π 1ICYMI: Weβre suing the Trump-Vance administration to demand the release of documents about ICEβs arrests at immigration courts and coordinated efforts to fast track deportations.
Due process is a right for everyone in the U.S. β regardless of immigration status.
"The federal agencies that survived Elon Muskβs wrecking ball are now captured by the echo chamber of his social media platform, with cabinet secretaries staring furiously into a digital funhouse mirror to divine the will of the most internet-addled members of the MAGA base." β @lizdye.bsky.social
29.10.2025 16:09 β π 835 π 221 π¬ 36 π 11The Trump administration is violating a settlement providing the families they separated with a pathway to remain together in the United States.
We successfully sued Trump to stop this cruel separation policy during his first term, and we will continue fighting for all these families.
Breaking news: The DOJ placed two federal prosecutors on leave after they filed a document in court that referred to the Jan. 6. attack on the U.S. Capitol as a βriotβ carried out by a βmob,β two people familiar with the matter said.
29.10.2025 16:18 β π 206 π 128 π¬ 54 π 36A federal judge criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi and other top Trump administration officials for making βtroublingβ statements against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man wrongly sent to El Salvador, that threaten his right to a fair trial. https://bit.ly/47vjJQ2
29.10.2025 16:24 β π 256 π 74 π¬ 2 π 3NEW: A federal judge criticized pro-voting groups, who are suing to block the Trump administration from using a citizenship verification system to purge state voter rolls, over their βmuddledβ filing and gave them until Wednesday to bolster their argument.
29.10.2025 16:25 β π 170 π 67 π¬ 11 π 3A federal judge demanded Trumpβs Border Patrol commander report to her courtroom every weekday to explain his forceβs controversial actions.
29.10.2025 16:43 β π 84 π 21 π¬ 3 π 1President Trump told reporters Wednesday that he has the authority to send U.S. military forces beyond the National Guard into U.S. cities, claiming not even the courts could stop him, but said that hasn't been necessary so far.
29.10.2025 17:03 β π 4 π 3 π¬ 5 π 1NEW: President Trump is asking the Supreme Court to consider birthright citizenship when all of the lower federal courts have unanimously ruled against him.
The 14th Amendment and 125 years of Supreme Court precedent are clear: If you're born on American soil, you are a citizen.
Trump claims he could send the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines into U.S. citiesβand says courts βwouldnβt get involved.β 
Reality: Presidents donβt get to militarize American streets at will. 
www.dailykos.com/stories/2025...
Iβm grateful to @atg.wa.gov Nick Brown for leading a lawsuit demanding that Trump release funding that Congress already approved to keep SNAP benefits going in November so families donβt go hungry.
29.10.2025 19:10 β π 121 π 47 π¬ 5 π 0U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, will preside over the trial in Portland. The trial stems from a lawsuit filed by the city and state against the Trump administration in a bid to block the troop deployment. https://to.pbs.org/432TGOE
29.10.2025 19:31 β π 115 π 34 π¬ 2 π 0CORDER LIST: 607 U.S.) WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2025 25A443 ORDER IN PENDING CASE TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. V. ILLINOIS, ET AL. The application for stay presented to Justice Barrett is referred by her to the Court. The parties are directed to file supplemental letter briefs addressing the following question: Whether the term "regular forces" refers to the regular forces of the United States military, and, if so, how that interpretation affects the operation of 10 U.S. C. Β§12406(3). The briefs, not to exceed 15 pages, are to be filed by Monday, November 10, 2025. Letter reply briefs, not to exceed 10 pages, are to be filed by Monday, November 17, 2025. Any brief for an amicus curiae under Rule 37.4, on that or other aspects of the application, must be filed by Monday, November 10, 2025.
BREAKING: SCOTUS defers any ruling for now in DOJ's request in the Nat'l Guard deployment case out of Illinois.
Instead, the court asks for briefing about the term "regular forces" in Section 12406 β a matter raised by @martylederman.bsky.social.  
The means the TRO stays in effect for now.
The Trump-Vance admin keeps trying to fire federal workers during the government shutdownβand it keeps losing to us in court.
This indefinite block of mass firings protects the civil servants that the American people rely on.
Trump was asked by a reporter to specify what he meant when he said he could send βmore than the National Guardβ into American cities, and he replied that he could send any branch of the military he wanted without any oversight from courts or from Congress.
29.10.2025 19:44 β π 48 π 39 π¬ 6 π 6