Joe Dudek's Avatar

Joe Dudek

@joedudekjd.bsky.social

Maryland attorney specializing in appeals and insurance coverage.

6,612 Followers  |  899 Following  |  11,346 Posts  |  Joined: 19.09.2023  |  2.4953

Latest posts by joedudekjd.bsky.social on Bluesky

Lord, give me the confidence of a Chotiner interviewee and the wisdom to never become one.

26.11.2025 04:21 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That's an NPC from Half Life.

26.11.2025 03:42 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hey, remember when the Senate Republicans confirmed Bove to a lifetime judgeship? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

26.11.2025 02:34 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

REPORTER: What kind of concessions are the Germans going to have to make?

F.D.R.: The big concession is they stop fighting and don't take any more land.

26.11.2025 02:29 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's β€œreach out,” Amy.

26.11.2025 00:28 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

As the United States Supreme Court emphatically reaffirmed, the role of the federal government in addressing race-based discrimination is β€œexceedingly limited.” Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 502 (1954).

25.11.2025 23:40 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just wait until all the boys arrive at your yard.

25.11.2025 23:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

See: bsky.app/profile/joed...

25.11.2025 20:19 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This was inevitable and will be entertaining: Judge Boasberg holding Judge Bove in contempt of court.

25.11.2025 20:18 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In January, we froze refugee admissions. Now, we're deporting refugees. And for what? To punish people for needing refuge?

We were strangers in the land of Egypt.

25.11.2025 17:50 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
a white dog sleeping on a white couch

a white dog sleeping on a white couch

Silly dog, that's not how you sit on a couch.

25.11.2025 01:16 β€” πŸ‘ 208    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 0

The lawyer who wrote this brief was a favorite clerk of Chief Justice Roberts and then-Judge Kavanaugh, who are both typically very hostile to campaign finance regulations.
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24...

24.11.2025 22:40 β€” πŸ‘ 30    πŸ” 19    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But what does "directive" even mean? If all he said is that he thinks Comey is a crook, are they really acting at his directive?

24.11.2025 20:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's not clear to me that it's Trump either. It's folks who think they are doing what Trump wants, even if he has long since stopped caring.

24.11.2025 20:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

BREAKING: New legal filing in important legal case says surprising things. [Link to news website.]

β“˜ This user did not include a link to the filing itself

24.11.2025 19:56 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Comey Indictment Is an Embarrassment The Justice Department should never have brought such a shoddy case.

β€œThe Justice Department should never have brought such an astoundingly shoddy case” against James Comey, @qjurecic.bsky.social argued in September. That decision, she added, was β€œan indication of how thoroughly Trump has been able to corrupt the department.”

24.11.2025 19:45 β€” πŸ‘ 172    πŸ” 37    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

He can take my athleisure when he pries it from my cold dead hands.

24.11.2025 19:49 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
two men are laughing and one of them says ' hahahaha ' on the screen Alt: Michael Scott and Dwight Schrute celebrate, yelling " we did it" to one another
24.11.2025 19:47 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Federalism But Only When Out of Power was one of Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s earliest research agendas.

24.11.2025 19:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, something like that. If there is a new indictment.

24.11.2025 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That seems more likely to be relevant to her failure to take the operative indictment to the grand jury than her filing an indictment in the first place. Most tasks undertaken while someone holds office and before they are held invalidly appointed are not void.

24.11.2025 19:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I just think de facto officer is going to win fight no. 2.

24.11.2025 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lindsey,

Judge Currie here. You are representing things that are simply not true.

Thought you should have a heads up.

24.11.2025 18:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think there are colorable arguments that an imposter to the office cannot extend the statute of limitations, but I am skeptical they will succeed.

24.11.2025 18:08 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

And so, in her own stupid way, Halligan succeeded. She extended a one-week statute of limitations by eight months β€” two while she was pretending to be a prosecutor and then six more under a statute.
bsky.app/profile/kenw...

24.11.2025 18:07 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Well, we’re back to malice tempered by incompetence. πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ

24.11.2025 17:42 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

I'm glad this is funny for you.

24.11.2025 03:57 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes. And thank you for breaking the thread so that you could call me stupid twice.
bsky.app/profile/joed...

24.11.2025 03:57 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You're oversimplifying both the formalism and the facts. On formalism: Yes, the standards are different, but that changes only the balancing proportion, not your arguments about the facts. On the facts: Alejandra’s case was about when the teacher’s words were the final straw, not the only straw.

24.11.2025 03:55 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image Post image Post image

Sure.
www.thefire.org/sites/defaul...

24.11.2025 03:47 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@joedudekjd is following 20 prominent accounts