That said, it is interesting that some people are so gullible that they believe the counter-narratives about USAID. As difficult as it is to face, USAID is corruption and fraud. Low-information people stick to the same sources, their sides, etc. Read more, use at least two dozen sources, think.

Politics are politics. Left sides with left, right with right. The truth is subordinate to the fact that the parties/sides are totalitarian machineries that put themselves above their nations.

Please use your real name to condemn this to show how altruistically narcissistic you are.

HuffPost still exists?

😆

EU can always ban AI and put sanctions on the countries that produce the resources the EU needs.

For instance, the media, family, coworkers all denying evidence of Biden's senility and questions concerning who actually ran the US last year.

Also, the rightwing sources engage with people and keep comments open. The leftwing sources retreat to safespaces where reality is not encountered. It’s such a mystery.

Another example of this mentality is that it is very short-term even though we shout words like SUSTAINABILITY and SOLIDARITY. It is reminiscent of addiction. No thought at all about long-term consequences. Corps, politicians, media, influencers, you. All push away everything unpleasant.

The liar is the greatest friend of humanity. That's also how you attack Trump. You yourself are better. It's a so-called mindfuck and it's fake. You lie by saying that the opponent is lying. That's a bit how Borderline personalities work. Constant projections because you can't look inside yourself.

The left argues almost exclusively through identity markers. So the opponents imagined intentions become the main course. And personality, i.e. which virtues they signal, which taboos they break, which things they did to break the Overton Window. The core is not factual issues or impact analyses.

Which movement is not ethically rooted? All these so-called movements are conflated with narcissism. The underlying message is that you are better than others. Result? You lie all the time. The biggest liars make you feel most comfortable. A cult; a dysfunctional relationship; biggest problem today.

Same guy who calls us kuffar, the disbelievers, the atheists who remain deaf and stubborn to the teachings of Islam, the rational message of the Quran. No thanks to taqiyya.

Left, right, third way... lies by omission and the intention is to manipulate us. Since human nature is this way, there is no solution.

Why were British women given Indians without consent?

Last week Rutte said the same thing in these words: We aren't losing but the front is moving in in the wrong direction.

What happens when fraudsters and grifters lose their source of income?

The issues cited here are the same things all other media and political sides do, e.g. strengthening their ideological messages, creating a sense of community among voters, and providing a counter-narrative to other media, etc.

The few people who are honest about these things are most vulnerable.

It’s an ironic term because those claiming that “trickle-down economics doesn’t work” often believe in its shadow: that higher taxes will trickle down.

So what's your upper limit?

Think about what drives people. Is it power, reputation, truth, beauty, etc.? There is too much total nonsense about "values" these days. It usually results in everyone being really nice and liking everything exactly the same. Truth is more important.

Say you are 30. You have collected your values ​​for 30 years and have a lot of emotional ties to your values. You may feel that your values ​​are you. You cannot inform or identify this away. It is beyond naïve to think so. But people believe in such nonsense.

Values? Political sides have no values. Values are a collective lie. Many (unfortunately many with influence) claim that values solve problems. No. If you have an emotional need to think something, it is on an emotional level. Not on a rational level.

Wouldn't it be a higher ideal to solve the problem by not being hateworthy?

Yeah, you're probably right.

See, the laissez-faire policy is spreading just like in the Salma al-Shehab case. Just imagine what it would be like if you weren't jailed for online posts? It's always the same. Only racists cause public unrest and destabilise civil and national security with their immoral posts.

Perhaps. What is more absurd is to suggest Britain should have free speech online.

Yeah but Huckleberry Finn, Of Mice and Men, and Dr. Seuss should still be banned for racism.

Yes, Americans must absolutely not know why your net worth grew so fast.

Yes, the judiciary should remain corrupt and incompetent.