7/7
Platforms like @corellium.bsky.social let teams test mobile apps & APIs in realistic environments - trace every call, check auth flows, and find issues before they become headlines.

How does your team test mobile app APIs?

#MobileSecurity #MobileApp #Corellium #CyberSecurity

6/7
To prevent this:
Test every API endpoint
Validate app ↔ backend authentication
Check for sensitive data leaks
Document exactly what each API can access

5/7
The big takeaway: Mobile app security isn’t just about the app.
Every mobile app talks to backend APIs.
If one endpoint is misconfigured, millions of people can be exposed.

4/7
This isn’t “just” a list of random numbers.
Attackers now know exactly which numbers use Authy for 2FA.
That makes SIM swapping and phishing much easier.

3/7
A hacker group called ShinyHunters found it.
They used it to dump the phone numbers of 33 million users.

2/7
In July, hackers broke into the Authy 2FA mobile app.
The cause? One API endpoint didn’t require authentication.

🚨 A single unprotected API endpoint just exposed 33 MILLION people.
Here’s how a small security gap in the Authy app turned into a massive breach 🧵

5/5
The question isn’t if you’ll face a compromised SDK-
It’s when-and whether you’ll catch it before your users do.

How is your team testing third-party SDKs?

#MobileSecurity #SupplyChainSecurity #SBOM #CyberSecurity #Corellium

4/5
Gartner says 45% of orgs will face supply chain attacks by 2025.

You can’t rely on reactive security anymore.

Platforms like @corellium.bsky.social help by:
Testing SDKs in isolation
Monitoring real-time behavior
Validating every update
Documenting your mobile stack

3/5
Here’s what most mobile teams can’t answer:
What SDKs are in our app?
What data can they access?
How do we test updates for security risks?

2/5
The worst part?
Most developers had no idea the “trusted” SDK was stealing user data.

They weren’t alerted. They weren’t prepared.

1/5
⚠️ 91% of organizations faced a software supply chain attack in 2024.
Mobile apps aren’t immune.

The SpinOK malware case proves it:
101 Android apps infected via a malicious ad SDK.
43 still live on Google Play-some with over 5M downloads.

5/5
Bottom line: Fintech apps need tight security, compliance, and performance. Swift delivers that.
Whatever you choose-automate security testing early. Tools like @corellium.bsky.social help find issues before attackers do.

#AppSecurity #iOSDev #Swift #ReactNative #corellium

4/5
Hidden costs of React Native:
SSL pinning libs often outdated
Jailbreak detection can be bypassed
Encryption keys exposed in JS bridge

These gaps add real risk.

3/5
Why it matters:
25% of top global banks use native mobile apps.
When performance and security are critical, Swift usually wins-especially in fintech.

2/5
Swift gives you native access to:
iOS Keychain
SSL pinning
Jailbreak detection
Secure Enclave

React Native? Relies on third-party libs, JS bridges, and has code that’s easier to reverse.

1/5
Building a new iOS app? Your choice between React Native and Swift could seriously affect your app’s security.
Just helped a fintech team make this call-here’s what most devs miss about the security side.

6/6
Research like TapTrap shows how advanced Android threats are becoming.
Huge respect to the researchers pushing mobile security forward.
This stuff matters.
#AndroidSecurity #Tapjacking #CyberSecurity

5/6
That’s where @corellium.bsky.social helps.
With virtual Android devices, you get:
Full control of OS & device
Frame-by-frame UI analysis

Tools to pause, inspect, and patch behavior
All without needing a real phone.

4/6
Tapjacking attacks like this are super hard to test.
You need:
The right Android version
Physical devices

Screen recording + perfect timing
Manual debugging usually messes up the UI itself.

3/6
No permission prompts upfront.
No obvious red flags.
Just invisible trickery that makes users give away sensitive access without realizing.

2/6
Here’s how it works:
The app looks like a harmless game or animation

But real permission dialogs (like screen recording or camera) are hidden underneath

When users tap to "play," they’re actually tapping "Allow"

1/6
A new invisible Android attack just dropped… and it's sneaky.
Researchers from TU Wien & University of Bayreuth discovered TapTrap – a tapjacking technique that tricks users into giving dangerous permissions without knowing.
#TapTrap #mobilesecurity

6/6
The mobile security threat is real.

The big question:
Are we testing our defenses as well as attackers are testing their exploits?

#MobileSecurity #CyberSecurity #Corellium

5/6
This is where platforms like @corellium.bsky.social help.

They let security teams simulate advanced mobile attacks safely-no risk to real devices or data.

Essential for staying ahead of modern threats.

4/6
Traditional security testing doesn’t cut it.

Mobile threats need a different approach—one that works across devices, OS versions, and attack types.

And no, testing a few phones in a lab isn’t enough.

3/6
Hackers can:
• Listen to calls
• Read texts
• Access contacts
• Infiltrate phones without any clicks

All without the user knowing.

2/6
Victims include people with access to classified info and critical systems.

Why are these attacks working?

Because while networks and laptops are secured, mobile phones are often overlooked.

1/6
The world is in a mobile security crisis 📱⚠️

A recent AP investigation revealed that hackers are silently targeting smartphones of officials, journalists, and tech workers using zero-click attacks.

These attacks leave no trace.

5/5
This is why security teams are turning to tools like
@corellium.bsky.social-testing devices in real conditions to catch hidden threats.
How many other “bargain” phones are silently stealing right now?