Petey has a drinking buddyβ¦
www.pbs.org/newshour/pol...
@sandman-defiance.bsky.social
Moderate, fact-based, loves democracy, defies those that wish to lull...
Petey has a drinking buddyβ¦
www.pbs.org/newshour/pol...
Talk about getting my blood boiling first thing in the morningβ¦
youtube.com/shorts/fVQyO...
Alcoholics usually donβt like accountabilityβ¦
apple.news/AUp9dJBODTf2...
So importantβ¦ beyond importantβ¦
youtube.com/shorts/c_MUJ...
Adam has been doing this for quite a while now...
15.04.2025 13:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0DOGE officials engaged in a security breach from the National Labor Relations Board, likely taking data "on unions, ongoing legal cases and corporate secrets" unrelated to efficiency, and then tried to cover their tracks. If they are doing it here, no reason to assume they are not doing it elsewhere
15.04.2025 12:48 β π 835 π 306 π¬ 17 π 15ahhhh....Russia style elections....
09.04.2025 16:46 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0There was a time when witness intimidation was actually against the law.
Liz Oyer has more guts than all of the GOP and some Dems as well.
ππ
www.facebook.com/share/v/1AdV...
and Magats will think "look at this...great news!" not realizing it is a signal for a world-wide economic slow down thanks to....well, we all know.
04.04.2025 13:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0want to believe this........want to...
28.03.2025 12:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Cool, Peteβ¦
youtube.com/shorts/3vVIZ...
Funny, just heard something similar, but tamped down a bit from JP Morgan Chase last week β¦
youtube.com/shorts/Vhsyt...
Two immediate takeaways.
1) This is why they hate higher education
2) Damn, women get a helluva lot more from an advanced degree than men-folk.
Small wonder Republicans don't want women in school.
The call is coming from inside the house.
21.03.2025 15:02 β π 71 π 23 π¬ 1 π 1her lawlessness goes sooo far back into her life...
20.03.2025 13:34 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Ooops, someone seemed to reveal a bit too much on the plans there??
20.03.2025 13:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0no exposed cross today...does that indicate a high lying day is in store?
19.03.2025 20:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0'Morning!
19.03.2025 16:20 β π 61 π 9 π¬ 1 π 0Hey Christians...from a Christian...listen up very carefully
19.03.2025 14:24 β π 10 π 4 π¬ 0 π 0Post about Conor McGregor w the PressSec
18.03.2025 20:40 β π 7 π 5 π¬ 1 π 0The Democrat party needs a partial refresh...NOW!
14.03.2025 13:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0and to use all this data he is accessing to build out his data/AI world...
12.03.2025 20:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Carney looks pretty decent...quite the credentials he is bringing in...
12.03.2025 20:55 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Check this out β American stocks were on par with global stocks up until late January β and have now dropped terribly since then
Gosh I wonder what happened in late January?
yea, no. anyone pushing out Rammstein will never be old...ever
12.03.2025 12:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Picture of police guarding a Tesla dealership.
Too bad Uvalde Elementary didnβt sell Teslas.
11.03.2025 09:54 β π 65528 π 16109 π¬ 2735 π 1148Case 1:25-cv-00716 Document 1 Filed 03/11/25 Page 1 of 43 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and, In their official capacities, PAMELA J. BONDI, BRENDAN CARR, RUSSELL T. VOUGHT, ANDREA R. LUCAS, CHARLES EZELL, STEPHEN EHEKIAN, and TULSI GABBARD, Defendants. Case No. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, the law firm of Perkins Coie LLP, brings this case against the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Communications Commission, the Office of Management & Budget, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Office of Personnel Management, the General Services Administration, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the United States of America, and, in their respective official capacities, Pamela J. Bondi, Brendan Carr, Russell T. Vought, Andrea R. Lucas, Charles Ezell, Stephen Ehekian, and Tulsi Gabbard, and states as follows: 1
Case 1:25-cv-00716 Document 1 Filed 03/11/25 Page 2 of 43 WHAT THIS CASE IS ABOUT 1. This case concerns an Executive Order issued on March 6, 2025, entitled, "Addressing Risks From Perkins Coie LLP" ("the Order"). The Order is an affront to the Constitution and our adversarial system of justice. Its plain purpose is to bully those who advocate points of view that the President perceives as adverse to the views of his Administration, whether those views are presented on behalf of paying or pro bono clients. Perkins Coie brings this case reluctantly. The firm is comprised of lawyers who advocate for clients; its attorneys and employees are not activists or partisans. But Perkins Coie's ability to represent the interests of its clients and its ability to operate as a legal-services business at allβ are under direct and imminent threat. Perkins Coie cannot allow its clients to be bullied. The firm is committed to a resolute defense of the rule of law, without regard to party or ideology, and therefore brings this lawsuit to declare the Order unlawful and to enjoin its implementation. The Order's peculiar title betrays its oddity as an Executive Order, for its purpose is not executive in nature. Rather, the Order reflects a purpose that is judicial-to adjudicate whether a handful of lawyers at Perkins Coie LLP ("Perkins Coie," "the law firm," or "the firm") engaged in misconduct in the course of litigation and then to punish them by: (I) terminating government contracts with firm clients, thereby driving away current and prospective clients; (2) denying all members and employees of the firm access to federal buildings and meetings or other engagement with federal employees; and (3) immediately suspending, and possibly revoking, security clearances for all firm employees. 3. The Order imposes these punishments on the entire law firm even though the attorneys involved in the purported misconduct numbered a mere handful of the more than 1,200
The PERKINS COIE law firm spits hot fire in its suit against Trumpβs executive order aimed at punishing the firm.
Strongly recommend reading the first 10 paragraphs of the βWHAT THIS CASE IS ABOUTβ section.
(h/t @mikescarcella.bsky.social)
fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldoc...