As we wrote: "a limited reliance on carbon pricing provides a disproportionately large share of the benefits offered by theoretically optimal carbon pricing."
05.03.2026 21:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@emildimanchev.bsky.social
Researching energy systems and climate policy. Postdoc at Princeton ZERO Lab. Research Affiliate at MIT CEEPR. Consulting for Good Judgment. 0th-gen immigrant. Writings: dimanchev.com.
As we wrote: "a limited reliance on carbon pricing provides a disproportionately large share of the benefits offered by theoretically optimal carbon pricing."
05.03.2026 21:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0What our research showed is that there is a range of policy mixes that are near-optimal. This is because the efficiency advantage of carbon pricing has diminishing returns, which is the main fundamental insight from the paper.
05.03.2026 21:22 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is not meant to let nations off the hook. The proposal being discussed in Italy is highly ill-conceived. But the point is that climate policy can overcome political challenges by changing how much it relies on different instruments within the policy mix.
05.03.2026 21:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0As EU lawmakers are looking to soften the continent's CO2 price, it's worth remembering that policy makers can overcome political constraints by complementing CO2 pricing with subsidies without sacrificing much economic efficiency, as I and @knittelmit.bsky.social show here: doi.org/10.1016/j.en...
05.03.2026 21:22 β π 5 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs definitely harder, donβt get me wrong.
05.03.2026 00:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thereβs a lot to say but to start it makes uncertainty/ignorance explicit. The process itself helps forecasting improve over time. And you can track accuracy with Brier scoring, etc.
05.03.2026 00:26 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Have you considered making probabilistic forecasts?
05.03.2026 00:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
"Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective."
-- Donald J. Trump (Nov. 2011)
www.youtube.com/shorts/siIXY...
I know right!
26.02.2026 07:40 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks! Yes, feel free to use without restrictions, attribution optional.
25.02.2026 18:49 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A moving stairway leading to an airplane door in Trondheim, Norway. The stairway walls are covered with solar PV panels.
Solar is cheap, exhibit 3,141,592,653.
25.02.2026 18:35 β π 68 π 18 π¬ 5 π 3In other words, Trumpβs mandate is not what he and some others think it is. It is in fact much, much narrower. Also, he is failing it.
25.02.2026 14:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Reason for hope:
βThe 2024 elections werenβt a tectonic social and cultural shift. They were not about rejecting the Enlightenment; they were a complaint about the cost of ground beef. Voters were not embracing patriarchal dictatorshipβ.
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/25/o...
Map of US states and Canadian province, color coded by their largest source of electricity.
www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-what-...
Love a good map
An important and underappreciated fact of electricity economics: The US average *wholesale* electricity price is ~5 c/kWh, or ~25% of the average *retail* price of ~19 c/kWh. The other ~75% of the electricity prices we pay is about poles, wires, transformers, generation capacity, and utility profit.
04.02.2026 14:28 β π 87 π 21 π¬ 8 π 4βGreat Britainβs day-ahead wholesale prices in 2024 could have been up to 33 per cent higher had there been no large-scale wind capacityβ¦around Β£83/MWh, but could have been as high as Β£121/MWhβ¦has over 29 GW of operational wind capacityβ
31.01.2026 15:19 β π 15 π 6 π¬ 1 π 0
Weβre just not a free country.
Any American watching this play out between regime forces and journalists overseas would recognize it for what it is.
A lot of things are incomprehensible these days. I don't understand what exactly these 32% are thinking, for example. bsky.app/profile/emil...
29.01.2026 15:33 β π 6 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Right. They think this liar is the de-escalator?!
29.01.2026 13:51 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Are you watching, America?
29.01.2026 13:48 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yep. Big tech has more to do to earn its social license.
29.01.2026 13:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Bring. Your. Own. New. Clean. Energy.
29.01.2026 12:33 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Good point. Here the approach was top-down and we fitted an S curve. This does capture the network effects at the beginning where they act as a brake, but is in contradiction at the end (where the ICE phase out slows down rather than speeds up).
28.01.2026 16:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0In our case we are not using consumer electronics as a reference class and I agree that would be an inaccurate analogy.
28.01.2026 13:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah I donβt think this word should be used lightly.
28.01.2026 13:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"Ultimately, failing to accurately price the chaos of a blackout prevents the very investments that could stop it β investments in resilience."
27.01.2026 21:30 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0What a front page.
27.01.2026 20:24 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Source: www.nytimes.com/2026/01/23/u...
27.01.2026 20:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Photo showing ICE agents pepper spraying a subdued person pinned down by three other agents on a street in Minneapolis. Photo credit: Vincent Alban / The New York Times
One heck of an image of ICE inhumanity from Wednesday last week in Minneapolis.
27.01.2026 20:21 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The point here is that what matters for emissions is how many miles are being driven in clean vehicles. A closely related proxy for this is how many of of the total vehicles on the road are clean; i.e. the share of EVs in the "fleet". The problem we face is that the fleet turns over very slowly.
27.01.2026 17:11 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 3 π 0