Today’s large language models—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok—can write code and polish prose. But would you trust them to do your taxes?
RAND's @carterprice.bsky.social discusses in @wsj.com.
@carterprice.bsky.social
Mathematician @RANDCorporation. I work on quantitative policy analysis for health, security, and other stuff. Opinions = mine, RTs ≠ endorsements
Today’s large language models—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok—can write code and polish prose. But would you trust them to do your taxes?
RAND's @carterprice.bsky.social discusses in @wsj.com.
When do you think you'll be comfortable with ChatGPT, Claude, or one of the others AI platforms doing your taxes?
22.12.2025 13:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This builds on some @rand.org work that I have with Akshaya Suresh about disruptions from labor replacing AI:
www.rand.org/pubs/working...
We’re not there yet, but the pace of progress suggests we could be within a year or two. Now is the time for workers, businesses, and policymakers to start preparing for these changes.
22.12.2025 13:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s not just individual workers who should be concerned—companies like H&R Block and Intuit, and many others whose business relies on managing paperwork, could be disrupted as AI advances.
22.12.2025 13:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In my piece, I propose a simple test: Would you trust #AI to do your taxes?
This requires both accuracy and trust. When AI can reliably read instructions, extract information from your documents, and complete the tax forms, it will be capable of automating a wide range of jobs.
There’s a lot of anxiety about AI replacing jobs, but today’s #AI tools aren’t quite ready to fully **replace** many humans in the workplace. Today's AI systems still require significant supervision, but the gap is closing fast.
22.12.2025 13:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0My commentary on #AI in today's @wsj.com:
www.wsj.com/opinion/woul...
7/ And learn more about the RAND Budget Model here: www.rand.org/education-em...
09.10.2025 13:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 06/ There's much more to explore in our report, which is free to download: www.rand.org/pubs/researc...
09.10.2025 13:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 05/ If we stay on the current path, more of our tax dollars will go to foreign countries than towards keeping Americans safe, responding to disasters, and delivering on all other national priorities.
➡️The bottom line: We tackled our debt burden in the past, and we can do it again.
4/ It will also require policymakers to build durable plans so that we can stay on track over the long time. Imagine a 30-year plan where policymakers came to a consensus on a general path to get to a fiscally sustainable place and a healthy economy.
09.10.2025 13:23 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 03/ This study provides an achievable benchmark for fiscal policy in the future.
But the specific tradeoffs require policymakers to make tough choices. They will need to think beyond the ten-year planning window Congress currently uses to estimate impacts of legislation.
2/ My colleagues Vegard Nygaard, Akshaya Suresh and I examined the last 80 years of federal debt, including how the US:
🔹reduced the debt burden from WWII over 30 years
🔹piled on debt over the next 50 years
🔹can reduce this burden over the next 30 years
www.rand.org/pubs/researc...
1/ In September, the federal debt hit $30 trillion. That's over 100% of GDP—higher than at any point since WWII.
How did we get here? And what might help the U.S. reduce the debt burden to a manageable level?
Our new @rand.org report explores…🧵