3rd Goldegg Meeting on Social Psychology & History, lunch break #historicaldistortion #historicalrepresentation
04.12.2025 13:52 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@rolandimhoff.bsky.social
Social Psychologist: Categorization, Stereotypes, Conspiracy Mentality; EASP Executive Committee; https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=PJwzk1EAAAAJ
3rd Goldegg Meeting on Social Psychology & History, lunch break #historicaldistortion #historicalrepresentation
04.12.2025 13:52 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Kazarovytska, F., Árnadóttir, K., D’Ottone, S. A., Halabi, S., Clarke, E. J. R., Sharma, S., Heidrich, V., & Imhoff, R. (in press). Do people across the world want to remember positive ingroup histories? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Preprint doi: doi.org/10.31234/osf...
26.11.2025 20:36 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Across seven countries, we find striking cross-national differences in what people want to preserve in collective memory. In some countries, primarily want to remember events in which the ingroup behaved morally. In other countries, there is a weaker preference for these ingroup-favoring histories.
26.11.2025 20:36 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0🚨New Preprint (in press @ JPSP)🚨
Publishing my research on Germans' desire for a “Schlussstrich” (to achieve closure on the Nazi past) was hard, as it seemed too specific for one context to many. Our new paper led by @zakfio.bsky.social provides global perspectives on the desire to remember/ forget.
DB-Durchsage zum wohlverdienten Ruhestand von Lokführer Harald nach 47 Jahren im ICE 557: "Harald Du bist mehr Kilometer im Zug gefahren als die meisten Menschen gelaufen sind!" Potzblitz!
20.11.2025 13:21 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Die Geisteswissenschaften und die Öffentlichkeit – Szenen einer Legitimationskrise Johannes Franzen 1 Katastrophenmeldungen Die populistischen Angriffe auf die Wissenschaft in der Gegenwart haben die Überzeugungskraft wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse nicht nur geschwächt, sondern auch zu einem Legitimationsschub beigetragen. Im April 2017 etwa demonstrierten zehntausende Menschen weltweit in einem ‚March for Science‘ gegen die Aushöhlung wissenschaftlicher Autorität, die vor allem mit Donald Trump, dem seit 2016 amtierenden Präsidenten der USA, assoziiert wurde. Trump gehörte nicht nur zu den prominentesten Leugnern des Klimawandels, sondern stand auch stellvertretend für eine Politik, die im Sinne ‚alternativer Fakten‘ oder eines ‚postfaktischen Zeitalters‘ eine rationale,
Die Geisteswissenschaften und die Öffentlichkeit – Szenen einer Legitimationskrise
Mein Aufsatz über die Forderung, Geisteswissenschaften sollten öffentlicher sein oder sich verweigern, und über die Angst, Richard David Precht zu werden, ist erschienen (open access).
brill.com/edcollchap-o...
Join us for the EASP 2026 Preconference:
"Social Psychological Processes of Collective Memory"
@easp2026.bsky.social ✨
With @olivierklein.bsky.social @jrvollhardt.bsky.social @michelletwali.bsky.social @elifsandal.bsky.social @laurentlicata.bsky.social
Submit here: www.easp.eu/news/itm/cal...
Neues #openaccess Kapitel: Für den von Mathis Lesau und Hans-Christian Riechers herausgegebenen Sammelband "Überzeugungskräfte: Über das Vertrauen in Wissenschaft (und Pseudowissenschaft)" durfte ich einen Beitrag zu Verschwörungstheorien als heterodoxes Wissen beisteuern. doi.org/10.30965/978...
19.11.2025 22:07 — 👍 8 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Screenshot of the landing page of the paper "The Psychology of Conspiracy Mentality"
On January 6, 2021, the US Capitol was attacked by a mob of Trump supporters. Exactly 5 years later, the free access to my new overview paper "The Psychology of Conspiracy Mentality" will expire. Coincidence, Elsevier? 🤐
Download now before it's too late:
authors.elsevier.com/a/1m7EoErgEa...
Ich freue mich sehr auf das @leizarchaeology.bsky.social Streitgespräch am 10.12. - 19 Uhr. "Wollen wir belogen werden?"
14.11.2025 07:12 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ciao, Roma!
08.11.2025 06:06 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0All roads lead to Rome... Surely hope all train tracks as well. Starting my ~20h journey to attend the #EASP EC meeting...
05.11.2025 22:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So, the visually accessible MC ratio on gender cues is typically enhanced. For categories like race, an implication would be that an increased frequency of people visually read as "biracial", the salience of the category dimension might attenuate...
05.11.2025 09:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes! It may also be part of the puzzle why age is less reliably used. In the information ecology, it has no clear category boundaries and a flat meta contrast ratio -- unless it is institutionally created (e.g., in schools). On the contrary, gender is actively done and emphasized: costumes, make-up
05.11.2025 09:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Forgot to tag @chrispetsko.bsky.social - apologies!
05.11.2025 09:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Heidrich, V., Flade, F., & Imhoff, R. (in press). Face the difference: Meta-contrast as an affordance to spontaneous social categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
This idea started in my 2019 ESCON keynote (with Felicitas Flade) and came to life thanks to the incredible talent of Verena Heidrich who turned this vague idea into a paper I am really proud of.
05.11.2025 07:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Across 5 pre-registered experiments, we found:
People don’t just categorize more when meta-contrast is high —
They prefer to use the dimension with the stronger relative meta-contrast when several are available.
We call the clarity of those clusters the meta-contrast ratio (kind of like an ANOVA F value or Cohen's d).
It’s like how the same mean difference feels “bigger” when the groups themselves are less variable.
Low within-group variance = stronger affordance to categorize along that line.
Imagine the features that define a category (like skin color for race or skin texture for age). If these cues fall into two tight, non-overlapping clusters, categorizing is easy.
If they’re messy and (almost) overlapping, not so much.
Borrowing from Christopher Petsko’s idea: What lens do people put on to make sense of their social world?
We suggest it depends on the information ecology — the distribution of cues we use to infer who belongs where.
Humans spontaneously sort others into categories — “women,” “BIPOC,” “elderly,” etc.
That’s well known.
But what’s less clear: why one category dimension dominates in a given situation. Why gender here but race there?
🎉 New paper accepted at JPSP: ASC!
Verena Heidrich, Felicitas Flade & I ask:
When people meet others, which social lens do they use — age, gender, race?
Our paper: “Face the Difference: Meta-contrast as an Affordance to Spontaneous Social Categorization.”
osf.io/preprints/ps...
provide a behavioral perspective which may support policymakers in co-designing effective and fair structural solutions to sustainability problems. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
11.10.2025 10:55 — 👍 3 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0✨ Wir suchen Verstärkung für ein Projekt zu 𝗔𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗺𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝗺 𝗔𝗿𝗯𝗲𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘁𝘇 - Bitte weitersagen! ✨
Zum 01.03.26 starten wir ein Projekt zu Antisemitismuserfahrungen im Arbeitskontext und vergeben eine Promotionsstelle (d/w/m, 75%, TV-L E13)!
www.psychjob.eu/de/job/wisse...
🚨Promotionsstelle "Antisemitismus am Arbeitsplatz" - TVL-13 75%, 4 Jahre 🚨
Bitte gerne eifrig weiterleiten: ab März 2026 (vorbehaltlich finaler BMFTR-Zusage) ist in unserem Team eine Stelle im Projekt von @zakfio.bsky.social zu vergeben. Näheres in der Ausschreibung:
www.psychjob.eu/de/job/wisse...
Whoever organizes #FGSP3027 will be more than delighted to realize that @olivergenschow.bsky.social has been promoting it and its hashtag in advance for more than a thousand years.
22.09.2025 07:05 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A fantastic #fgsp2025 German SocPsy meeting is crowned with a band performance feat. organizers @hansalves.bsky.social @wilhelmhofmann.bsky.social and @moritzingendahl.bsky.social! A really great organization and inspiring event. See you at #fgsp2027 in Lüneburg (w/ @olivergenschow.bsky.social).
17.09.2025 06:36 — 👍 26 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Ph.D. position/ Promotionsstelle (75%; f/m/d) "Parsimony in Bias Research". Please share with potential candidates - gerne streuen:
www.psychjob.eu/de/job/promo...