Nosso periódico-membro @cadlin.bsky.social está com uma chamada aberta para temática de Reprodutibilidade! Confere lá!
#CiênciaAberta
#reprodutibilidade
@segundojao.bsky.social
🍎 Scientific communication, 🚥 research & publication behavior https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-6045 💍 Opinions mine, my own, my precious. 🏳️⚧️ ally. Member of https://bsky.app/profile/redebrrepro.bsky.social
Nosso periódico-membro @cadlin.bsky.social está com uma chamada aberta para temática de Reprodutibilidade! Confere lá!
#CiênciaAberta
#reprodutibilidade
🌈🍀
19.08.2025 15:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You can do it. It doesn’t have to be perfect, just coherent. 🍀
19.08.2025 12:16 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0📝 Today, the team behind the GLOBAL reporting guideline invites researchers who are preparing or reviewing a bibliometric article to take part in a pilot test of the guideline.
👇 Find more information in the article below
[1/2]
New research - Differences Between Nursing Studies Posted as Preprints on medRxiv or SSRN and Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals. Similarly to previous research, we find that only 4% (2 out of 51) had changes in their primary conclusions. doi.org/10.1111/inr....
11.08.2025 18:59 — 👍 2 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0“This double bind – needing to be present but sceptical of the value – is a defining feature of the current moment.”
18.08.2025 01:43 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Implications for adherence to best practices in research reporting were discussed.
🔓OA PDF in English below ⤵️
doi.org/10.5007/1518...
The ordering of the questions in the survey was deliberate so that the subsequent response would validate/invalidate the previous response. That led us to believe that motivated reasoning might be at play, influencing a sample of highly educated and rational individuals.
17.08.2025 19:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Approximately 2/3 of the leaders interviewed reported using the EQUATOR checklist appropriately in their recent research. However, within the «SAME» sample, only 1/2 were aware of the EQUATOR Initiative. Weird, huh? 🫧🐠🪸
17.08.2025 19:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0🧠 Are scientists as rational as we'd like to believe ourselves to be?
We aimed to quantify the level of knowledge and frequency of use of the @equatornetwork.bsky.social reporting guidelines among leaders of Brazilian health sciences research groups.
[📢 PRAZO PRORROGADO!]
Seja um Embaixador da RBR!
Se você deseja fomentar a ciência aberta e a reprodutibilidade em sua comunidade, esta é a sua chance!
Link para inscrição: lnkd.in/dgqGmAS8
#CiênciaAberta #pesquisadores #cienciabrasileira
#reprodutibilidade
How Brazil can (and may) retaliate in the trade war initiated by the king of the US. Spoiler: it’s got to do with some serious patent breaking.
(In Portuguese)
atarde.com.br/artigos/o-po...
Wow
09.07.2025 12:45 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0🚨 job posting 🚨
07.07.2025 13:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"Tomar café da manhã sem pressa"
atarde.com.br/muito/parei-...
(i) Citation measures only attention, not true consequences in the social fabric.
(ii) People select info/data they already agree with/believe in, therefore advertising doesn’t work and the whole fake news scare is a battle uphill against windmills.
A segunda chamada do Programa de Embaixadores está aberta! ✨
Se você se interessa por reprodutibilidade e ciência aberta, independente da sua formação ou área de atuação, este programa é para você! Todos são bem-vindos na nossa rede.
Mais informações: www.reprodutibilidade.org/blog.
É semana que vem!!
#reprodutibilidade #periódicos #ciência
Alerta de vaga para jornalismo científico 🚨 🧫🔬✨
25.06.2025 12:52 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"a falta de regulamentações pelo CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) e pela CAPES (Fundação Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) expõe os pesquisadores às políticas instáveis de empresas internacionais, e institucionais."
28.05.2025 17:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"Discutimos como balancear os ganhos de eficiência com a preservação da criatividade e do desenvolvimento de habilidades analíticas. Propomos que a tecnologia seja integrada em etapas mais mecânicas, como a revisão de gramática e a organização de referências. [...]
blog.scielo.org/blog/2025/02...
"Citation analysis revealed that 76% of retracted articles continued to be cited, accumulating a total of 9662 citations, with articles in the Health and Biological Sciences fields receiving the highest average citations."
doi.org/10.1007/s111...
Full text in Brazilian-Portuguese in the link below. doi.org/10.1590/2318...
28.05.2025 14:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Meaning that, although clinical practice seems to be moving towards patient involvement in medical decision-making, we may not be allowing patients access to the scientific knowledge that should inform said decision-making by imposing language barriers to access said information.
28.05.2025 14:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What we found out was that, although we are publishing more on the topic overall, we are not publishing about biomedical interventions per se, meaning either the Portuguese-speaking researchers are publishing about them in other languages, or elsewhere outside of the LatAm publishing ecosystem.
28.05.2025 14:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0So, we've set out to try and understand how the Portuguese-speaking research community has been behaving in the past 20 years when it comes to publishing empirical research on biomedical interventions for the trans community.
28.05.2025 14:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Happening in two days! Register here ⬇️
28.05.2025 14:00 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0"Plataforma permite que pesquisadores solicitem avaliação de seus preprints" via @pesquisafapesp.bsky.social 🧪
revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/plataforma-p...
& Jane Fonda youtu.be/Z_v0NJ8_8ps?...
25.02.2025 21:23 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0