Bod

Conference can't vote to force people working for it to break the law 🤷

No one will force positive discrimination on them, but if they want special rights for women, they have to be for women.

"Women and some men" is not a legally protected act of discrimination.

"Women and some men" is not a protected category.

Remember, if you are providing places for women as a positive discrimination measure, you can't then offer the place to a male.

It's the law!

Weird how a political conference can't force employees to break the law 🙄

I don't think they're running coaches from Tel Aviv

This doesn't work when the fans aren't coming for an afternoon but for 24/48 hours

A career criminal and proven liar who no one else claims was at stonewall on the night but himself. No reports of a 6'4 black trans in the bar at all.

No record at all, no witnesses at all.

Even claimed to be part of the Attica prison riots when he was in prison elsewhere 🙄

If we want to kill the left, the best way is to make removing women's rights a sacred cow policy that can't be discussed.

@mattdaviesadams.bsky.social Nice job on the audio commentary, must've been bloody awkward 👍

Yes

It's not just a surrender when the union is working with management against their own members.

Unions demanding workers are punished for lawful behaviour & supporting management in employment tribunals does happen occasionally and is a really bad look.

He's probably referring to unions such as UCU and Unite who have recently been on the management side in cases such as Peggie & Phoenix involving women's rights

People don't travel that far to turn up just before kick off.

And the 24/48 hours beforehand?

This isn't people out for an afternoon.

The stadium is never where the violence occurs (& Tommeh's nazis won't be even trying for tickets)

How do we deal with all the Brit Nazis who are going to Birmingham for a scrap with the locals?

Or just pirate them.

To many to pay for the lot

And the SC hasn't impacted non GRC holders in the slightest.

No it hasn't.

As long as you didn't listen to those paid to tell you lies.

Transwomen are no different to any other bloke and deserve no different treatment from other men

Aw dude did they stop running non stop "aren't they sweet" stories?

It still doesn't say anything relevant 5 mins later.

Remember, you know so little you thought the Supreme Court didn't follow the Human Rights Convention and that EHRC weren't on your side 🤪

It's a nothing burger 🤷

"Shock horror!! Political appointee with no legal role who has campaigned against women's rights for 20 years is against women's rights" 🙄

That little enabling act allows them to advise.

It does not allow them to overrule advice from the supreme court.

Of course parliament can change it, that has no relevance to anything.

You don't know much do you?

There is no such legislation

You don't know much do you?

The human rights act is UK law and the supreme court is the body that rules on compliance.

Not quangos.

You don't know much do you?

Interpreting statute is the role of the supreme court, not a quango.

You really don't know much do you?

The EHRC did intervene at the supreme court to argue against FWS.

Here's their view in advance...

Nobody really cares about men demanding the right to expose themselves to women