Arin Dube's Avatar

Arin Dube

@arindube.bsky.social

Provost Prof. of Economics (UMass Amherst). Inequality, labor market policies and competition. Affiliations: NBER, IZA, MIT Shaping the Future of Work Initiative Preorder my book, The Wage Standard: https://www.thewagestandard.com

15,052 Followers  |  675 Following  |  9,370 Posts  |  Joined: 03.05.2023  |  2.0709

Latest posts by arindube.bsky.social on Bluesky

In forecasting the future of AI, it's easy to miss the main point.

Whether AI largely substitutes or complements human capabilities isn't merely a technological matter.

It's a societal choice.

08.02.2026 17:44 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 6

Bad day for bubbles

05.02.2026 21:45 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Twitter/X is not real life, apparently.

05.02.2026 16:46 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's a statement about relative price changes.

Restaurant meal prices have risen more than prices of food at home - so restaurant meals have become relatively more expensive.

03.02.2026 04:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

It's a statement about relative price changes

Restaurant meal prices have risen more than prices of food at home - so restaurant meals have become relatively more expensive.

03.02.2026 04:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The DoorDash discourse is missing the bigger picture: restaurant meals have become more expensive than preparing food at home, and guess what? People are are eating less restaurant meals (whether takeout or going out) and preparing more food at home.

Especially poorer and younger folk.

03.02.2026 03:19 β€” πŸ‘ 57    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 3
Post image

We can learn a lot from Moltbook - by reading how people react to a simulacrum

31.01.2026 13:03 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

37 year old ICU nurse shot to death in a brazen act of state terror.

24.01.2026 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

We will remember Alex Pretti.

24.01.2026 23:21 β€” πŸ‘ 73    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

This

22.01.2026 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

πŸ’― accurate description.

21.01.2026 20:14 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Breaking: Econometrica is now accepting "Framework of a paper" submissions

22.01.2026 00:26 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

The Lucas Cri-taco?

21.01.2026 23:09 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

Yes!

21.01.2026 20:32 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Fundamentally, the problem is TACO undermines itself over time.

21.01.2026 20:13 β€” πŸ‘ 261    πŸ” 22    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

How markets factor in Trump came up in the Fed firing oral argument today at SCOTUS. SG pointed to lack of market reaction to Cook's firing as a reason why the impact is not so bad, but no discussion of whether market assumed courts would intervene, and so on.

21.01.2026 20:05 β€” πŸ‘ 44    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Here’s the really bad part: over time, this dynamic breeds bigger and bigger crises.

Markets keep updating their beliefs about TACO, so it takes ever more extreme actions to convince them he might not TACO.

Buckle up.

21.01.2026 19:59 β€” πŸ‘ 770    πŸ” 132    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 10

The single best theory of the last few months

21.01.2026 19:50 β€” πŸ‘ 145    πŸ” 26    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

The TACO cycle:

Markets want to price in TACO. But TACO only works if Trump sees stocks tank.

So we get a loop: Trump does things β†’ nothing happens (markets already priced in TACO) β†’ that emboldens him to do more β†’ until markets start to think he might not TACO β†’ stocks fall β†’ TACO is restored.

21.01.2026 19:48 β€” πŸ‘ 2892    πŸ” 717    πŸ’¬ 86    πŸ“Œ 66

I really don't know what you mean, perhaps in no small part because I have never known any policy agenda to feel ever-present in any moment...

21.01.2026 04:01 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That would (at least in the short term) lead to a worsening of the downturn.

Of course, none of this may happen. (I hope it doesn't!) But I see these as very plausible scenarios.

21.01.2026 03:45 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The add-on risk is macro-economic. Given the importance of AI cap-ex in holding up spending, a sharp reduction in AI asset prices will likely cause a major reduction in spending.

Our current political economy is probably tilted against providing necessary fiscal stimulus.

21.01.2026 03:44 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Think 30%+ in the S&P 500 ... sometime in 2026.

I'm not in the business of forecasting asset prices (no one really is, if they're honest). But these risks feel very real.

21.01.2026 03:44 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Right now, the most likely source of that kind of shock (and not unrelated to tech valuation) is political economy: Trump's trade and military choices.

Layer that on top of possibly finding weaker-than-expected AI earnings, and you can get to a major drawdown.

21.01.2026 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Don't get me wrong: AI will still be valuable after such a crash, but asset prices will very likely adjust downwards.

The question is how it happens. Most often bubbles unwind after a shock ... something that jolts sentiment and forces deleveraging/margin calls.

21.01.2026 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

My 2026 market outlook: a tech bubble meets political shocksβ€”Trump's trade and military choicesβ€”potentially triggering a 30%+ S&P drawdown.

AI will remain valuable, but current asset prices can't be reconciled with plausible earnings. Here's how I see it playing out:

🧡

21.01.2026 03:42 β€” πŸ‘ 23    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

I was confirming that coding based on my prompts was able to replicate correct outcomes - in both languages. Julia, which I've am not familiar with, and Python, which I am.

I know what's "correct" because I have the ground truth sample to check against.

21.01.2026 02:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As @eschatonblog.com used to say, another wild day at the dog track. Amazing what threatening military and economic conflict with your major trading partners and allies can do!

20.01.2026 21:41 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I do not like how close POTUS is getting to declaring war against Minnesotans & ordering the U.S. Army to coerce us.

We are standing up peacefully.

The only way I see this walk down is enough GOP members of Congress coalesce with Ds to reign him in on this.

What can u do to advance that?

20.01.2026 00:04 β€” πŸ‘ 230    πŸ” 38    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 0

I think Matt gave example of how in his work it can help the ability to reason and make informed arguments. I think the big question is under what circumstances does AI complement versus purely substitute human expertise ...

19.01.2026 23:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@arindube is following 20 prominent accounts