Congrats!
03.12.2025 23:32 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@chubicki.bsky.social
Robotics Professor • Director, Optimal Robotics Lab • Florida State University • Legged Robotics—Control and AI—Biomechanics • TEDx Fellow • Science babbled on National TV
Congrats!
03.12.2025 23:32 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0users with similar passwords also liked:
02.12.2025 21:18 — 👍 1372 🔁 190 💬 17 📌 4In lecture, I crossed out a term in the math and said “hey girl, good bye” to the dire confusion of the class.
02.12.2025 15:03 — 👍 19 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Silver lining is it inspired me to give a whole hour-long talk 7 years later on how to spot a fake robot video (and how not to) as penance for my failure.
02.12.2025 14:42 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I’ll cop to my bias as I now actively discount my ability to spot fakes based on video artifacts alone. I thought the Method2 was fake in 2017 based on the overall video gloss and context of the video release (some CGI/graphics designer just put it out on Instagram). It was very real, of course.
02.12.2025 14:38 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0👍
I’m only a little sad how much I now need to know about popular streamers in order to keep up with robotics news.
*Not edited* is too strong a claim. Little camera/editing tricks can give a video more oomph. But I don’t currently have reason to believe this robot isn’t currently performing these maneuvers in a manner similar to the video.
This is from April. I talked about EngineAI in my August humanoids talk.
I’m always open to evidence from credible hunters of fakes, but I’m inclined to believe it. Their prior videos have included unedited demos with people interacting in frame. This is a natural next iteration of those.
02.12.2025 13:32 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Engine AI has always had the most interestingly and oddly pseudo mechanical-looking human motion retargeting. I wonder if that’s in the key framing or the reward.
02.12.2025 13:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Managed to login to my old Dominos account and it had my home address listed as my grad student office.
01.12.2025 15:07 — 👍 22 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0“Are you vegetarian?”
“That is our preference”
LOL. Bravo Vince.
Yes
26.11.2025 00:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0*retargeting
25.11.2025 14:15 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That’s super. One of the better applications for humanoids are theme parks. They’re using motion targeting probably. Two years ago, Disney blew everyone away at a major robotics conference when they trotted out walking droids that looked amazing.
25.11.2025 07:36 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0And even then, you could at least delete the Google+ account if you didn’t want it.
22.11.2025 16:53 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thanks. Tagging with -ai works pretty well too. The fact that you have to do such a ritual for every search is maddening.
22.11.2025 15:02 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 02025, folks.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/21/w...
The fact that you can’t turn off AI search summaries is such a red flag. Doesn’t seem like a normal and non-desperate way to roll out an experimental feature.
22.11.2025 13:12 — 👍 85 🔁 5 💬 3 📌 0A male Anna’s hummingbird at the door. So nosy! 🤣
Earlier today, I was notified that someone was at my door.
This is who it was:
And I’m not immune to falling for the anomaly-hunting trap. When a video looks a bit too shiny it looks fake, but that can sometimes just be an effect in post-production on real footage.
14.11.2025 18:18 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0One robotics CEO accuses another company of faking their launch video w/ CGI.
He’s probably wrong and certainly false in his certainty, but there’s a greater lesson.
Detecting CGI is an expert skill. Falling down an anomaly-nitpicking rabbit hole is a common trap that tends to confirm your biases.
Tried to shout you out by name but the words didn’t quite form.
14.11.2025 17:21 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Nightmarish idea for a startup tbh
13.11.2025 21:35 — 👍 1340 🔁 164 💬 234 📌 985Sign me up, Bill.
12.11.2025 16:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The “runner’s high” is a scam concept that dangles false hope in front of me every time I run.
12.11.2025 16:30 — 👍 25 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0From the Philippines during Typhoon Fung-wong via CTV:
youtu.be/gsXQYvCCba4?...
“Hey Tacoma Narrows, hold my beer!”
10.11.2025 23:38 — 👍 16 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I’d say it’s unreal
10.11.2025 21:52 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You: are your humanoid robots useful?
Company: we're making a million of them.
You: not my question.
Company: hey look, it's doing kung fu!
I agree with every word. It’s why I love signal boosting this story.
10.11.2025 17:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0