Excellent. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
21.09.2025 10:53 — 👍 7 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0@lojikil.bsky.social
Brains in the "trying to be a good dad despite having a bad dad" gang. ☦️|Father|Philosopher|Offensive Security|PLT I work in security at a decent sized firm, but my research interests are actually around Multics, ML dialects, &c
Excellent. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
21.09.2025 10:53 — 👍 7 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0Hello hello! I’m worse with responding on socials nowadays, but I’ve always enjoyed our conversations! How are you doing??
30.05.2025 19:59 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ja I think this is it; I’ve largely stopped posting anywhere, but if I do it’s mainly Mastodon (for whatever that is worth).
27.05.2025 00:12 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And you as well, really great to see what you’re working on now!
Also, I’m sorry for the delay, I don’t really use any social media anymore.
I really love when a language or tool you’re working on comes together like this. Great work!
25.04.2025 00:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0We need a @badthingsdaily.bsky.social entry for “your most senior advisors have invited a journalist to a signal chat they’re not supposed to have”
25.03.2025 14:50 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I’m pretty sure this is us everyday, friend
22.03.2025 14:29 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Congratulations! Are you focusing on any specific part of Startups or a specific vertical?
18.03.2025 23:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0We asked this machine trained on war scenarios for how to end the conflict in Ukraine, and you’ll be shocked to learn how it turns out!
04.03.2025 19:13 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Also didn’t we miss the lessons of Toyota’s lean delivery? Iirc they had much more planning, supply chain depth, and understanding of capacity and utilization than most “JIT and JIT alone” proponents expound
22.02.2025 20:56 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0LATE from me: You know you've done some weird stuff when *everyone* in the nuclear weapons field is upset.
There are a few paths forward with a diminished DOE + NNSA, but none of them properly support an build-up, the status quo, *or* reductions. Another massive own-goal no matter your priors.
Two comments:
First, item (a)(iii) would be financially ruinous for us—even if it can be made to work—not least because we would constantly have to maintain vast numbers of space-based interceptors in orbit to ensure enough are always on station high above Russia, China, North Korea, all ...
And I still maintain that this is big “mineshaft gap” energy. The handwringing about how “China might be fielding LLMs on the battlefield” is just wild to me. If you want to talk information superiority/dominance, maybe, but otherwise it seems like GEN Turgidson pointing at the big board
28.01.2025 15:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I hope @edzitron.com writes more about this, but the assumption that lighting the earth on fire for some sort of NOBUS AI capability that China/Russia can’t have is tied to not understanding the tech or not understanding great powers competition or both (likely with an aperitif of jingoism)
28.01.2025 14:58 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I wish the US did this, especially if it were at the Caucus level
26.01.2025 19:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Part of the overall project with these systems in addition to eliminating critical thinking, is to water down anything transformative or radical.
19.01.2025 01:17 — 👍 2293 🔁 751 💬 113 📌 405Some notes on Barthes’ “The Death of the Author,” the false authority of LLMs, and why you can’t argue that the author is dead if you’re using AI to reanimate the corpse. mail.cyberneticforests.com/data-prior-t...
12.01.2025 13:07 — 👍 49 🔁 11 💬 9 📌 8Arguing with a toddler as to who is delirious at 0540 when he has been up and down for two hours is fun.
Me: go to sleep bud you’re delirious
Him: nO yOu ArE dElIrIoUs
It’s pretty amazing to me that any sort of remote management is allowed that could reach into these sorts of systems. Not surprising per se, but still amazing
06.01.2025 20:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I definitely didn’t expect Santa vs Ded Moroz dueling propaganda wars…
30.12.2024 22:38 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Now the party is ready to get started…
30.12.2024 22:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A game I had installed on my iPad just asked if I would agree to arbitration; in light of Disney, I’d be curious how far and wide such agreements will eventually cover.
28.12.2024 16:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A brutal regime falls. But there’s a problem: the UN and several countries say the victorious rebels are terrorists. What to do? There’s no playbook for Islamist insurgents faced with the challenges of running a country. But there is a precedent, in Afghanistan. 1/
09.12.2024 12:02 — 👍 76 🔁 43 💬 6 📌 15Ja I spent a lot of time reading these sorts of scams at my last job, it was fascinating how quickly actors could adopt to a new security control
03.12.2024 23:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It’s also interesting how they updated for filtered messages, suggesting you should copy and paste the link if it’s not clickable (which it won’t be for the Unknown Senders filter)
03.12.2024 22:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Just before the holiday, we broke the story this weekend of how a longtime Exxon lobbyist has been investigated by the FBI over a sweeping cyberespionage campaign targeting hundreds of environmentalists across the United States.
www.reuters.com/business/ene...
Also, of further issue, it looks like none of the records changed in the ETL for the v4 or v5 CVEs.
So basically, it looks like something wonky happened with a bunch of early records during a migration or the like internally? /cc @jgamblin.bsky.social
So spot checking a few and it looks like nothing of substance changed…
02.12.2024 20:08 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I guess I’ll audit and see if they *actually* changed or this was just a reload. This sort of data hoarding is why I have like 80GB of vulnerability data
02.12.2024 18:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0… but I think they may have screwed up the data? Requesting everything updated since 2024-NOV-20 returns a ton of 1999 data…
02.12.2024 17:19 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0