Julia Nafziger's Avatar

Julia Nafziger

@julianafziger.bsky.social

Behavioral and Experimental Economist, Professor @Aarhus University, Denmark

781 Followers  |  206 Following  |  8 Posts  |  Joined: 08.10.2023  |  1.7265

Latest posts by julianafziger.bsky.social on Bluesky

BeliefsComp.pdf

🚨 New Discussion Paper: Gender Norms, Stereotypical Beliefs, and Competitiveness🚨

drive.google.com/file/d/1G_PP...

08.04.2025 13:22 — 👍 4    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 1

Thanks - it was a pleasure to be part of Marc’s committee. And congrats to @mvoldeniel.bsky.social to his excellent thesis!

26.01.2025 18:36 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
DP19712 Gradual Policy Reforms We investigate, using an online experiment, whether a gradual policy reform can increase support for CO2 taxes compared to a one-step reform. Under a gradual reform, voters first decide on implementing an intermediate tax, followed by a second decision between maintaining the intermediate tax or adopting a higher tax. We hypothesize that the gradual reform may increase voter support by shifting norms and correcting misperceptions; but it has the disadvantage that the benefits of a high tax, relative to an intermediate tax, can appear (too) small. Our empirical findings reveal that the gradual reform backfires: fewer voters support a high CO2 tax under the gradual reform than under the one-step reform. This effect appears to stem from voter satisfaction with the intermediate tax and adverse responses to subsequent reform steps. Further, positive perceptions that arise from experiencing an intermediate tax do not spillover to perceptions about the high tax. Information provision partially alleviates backfiring of the gradual reform.

Full paper & insights here: cepr.org/publications...

The work was supported by the Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond, AUFF and Carlsberg Foundation and conducted at Aarhus BSS - Aarhus University

#ClimatePolicy #CO2Tax #EnvironmentalEconomics #Sustainability

28.11.2024 08:26 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

📊 Implications: Gradual reforms can, under certain circumstances, reduce support for ambitious climate policies—our study highlights key trade-offs. Providing information can partially alleviate these negative effects.

28.11.2024 08:26 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

💡 Key Finding: The gradual reform backfires. Fewer voters support a higher tax under the gradual than under the one-step reform - reasons are satisfaction with the intermediate tax and resistance to further reform steps. Positive perceptions of intermediate taxes do not spill over to higher taxes.

28.11.2024 08:26 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0


🔍 Hypothesis: Using an online experiment with a representative sample of 2,237 participants from the UK, we hypothesize that a gradual reform could shift norms and reduce misperceptions about the tax's effects—but it might also lead to voter satisfaction with the intermediate tax.

28.11.2024 08:26 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

🚨 New Discussion Paper: Gradual Policy Reforms 🚨

In our latest research, Alexander Koch and I explore whether gradually implementing a CO₂ tax can increase voter support compared to a one-step reform.

28.11.2024 08:26 — 👍 7    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Our article “Spillover effects of reminder nudges in complex environments” has been published in PNAS. We show that nudges have negative spillover effects, which persist even after the removal of the nudge, while the positive effects on targeted behavior diminish.
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

18.04.2024 18:52 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@julianafziger is following 20 prominent accounts