Garret Hohl's Avatar

Garret Hohl

@garrethohl.bsky.social

Writing for The Five Hohl substack. I used to do other things.

1,963 Followers  |  194 Following  |  2,548 Posts  |  Joined: 17.10.2023  |  1.5451

Latest posts by garrethohl.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

#NHLJets lose 4-1 to Tampa, drop to 1-2-1 in their last four, and once again the wheels come off late. Some bright spots, but the same problems remain.

Game 53 recap ⬇️
open.substack.com/pub/thefiveh...

30.01.2026 16:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It is not a good defense that more than one coach or GM makes the same decision (mistake).

Biases are not random. They are ingrained in us via evolution through heuristics & such.

They exist in all humans and will be especially pervasive when people have similar backgrounds.

30.01.2026 07:20 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I'm noticing a pattern
#NHLJets

30.01.2026 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image 28.01.2026 02:07 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Reminder that a lot of "insider" media is controlled leaks by either GMs or agents trying to impact trades or fan perceptions.

28.01.2026 02:05 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I get trying to inflate trade value, but maybe not the greatest idea

28.01.2026 02:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Perfetti is a much more effective forechecker and defensive-zone pick-pocketer than people give him credit for

28.01.2026 01:09 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Top 20 scorers relative to 5v5 TOI for 2019-2025 (minimum of 2k minutes):

26.01.2026 17:49 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

We don’t need this shit in #Winnipeg, or anywhere else.

25.01.2026 18:49 β€” πŸ‘ 50    πŸ” 18    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 1

Au revoir Montreal

25.01.2026 23:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My 4-year-old heard Ken say β€œstopped by Hellebuyck” and he goes β€œGO HELLO PUCK”

This is my analysis through 4 minutes of play

25.01.2026 00:28 β€” πŸ‘ 52    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

Unfortunately youd be disappointed if you knew how much teams really do use good modelling/analysis and how much of it is glorified video coaching or coaches/GMs asking if a player does a certain thing a lot/little.

23.01.2026 05:08 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not saying you should or not should call certain calls... but not calling a penalty that is a penalty IS FACTORING IN THE GAME

23.01.2026 03:17 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 23.01.2026 02:49 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Update after two, some regression towards the mean by both extremas:

Morrissey-DeMelo: 60% Corsi, 83% xGoal
Samberg-Salomonsson: 73%, 88%
Stanley-Schenn.... 31%, 19%

23.01.2026 02:39 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In the first period you are talking about the Jets making mistakes and having giveaways in the neutral zone.

Half way in the second period you talk about both teams playing "mature defensive hockey without mistakes" (paraphrased).

23.01.2026 02:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's brutal

23.01.2026 02:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Man those two have been bad with the puck today.
Most Jets good though.

23.01.2026 02:08 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

After one period

Morrissey-DeMelo: 71% Corsi, 96% xGoal
Samberg-Salomonsson: 50%, 71%
Stanley-Schenn.... 11%, 11% πŸ€”

23.01.2026 01:46 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Private data has way more utility and earlier significance due to the immense granularity, but the overall picture gains are marginal.

23.01.2026 00:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Funny thing when he downplayed that point when it was the opposite though hahah

22.01.2026 23:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What I mean this:

There's no reason the Jets should be dissapointed with their 5v5 offensive performance. It has been as one should expect.

There's a bias where people get dissapointed by the under acheivers but don't adjust for the over acheivers.

They are who they are.

22.01.2026 19:53 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Given historical scoring rates and their current ice time, the #NHLJets' Forward 5v5 scoring is pretty much EXACTLY as expected.

As many goals as expected and more assists. This team is what you should expect.

Not really underperforming there. #GoJetsGo

22.01.2026 19:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Crash Test Dummies
Opeth
KMFDM
K-Aos
UnderOath

(Trying to intentionally make it as all over the place as possible)

21.01.2026 03:58 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Only special teams goals and an ENG for Scheifele? Must be the influence of Blake Wheeler in the building

21.01.2026 03:36 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

IMO if you pull the goalie and ice the puck you should not be able to put them back in.

21.01.2026 03:38 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Context:

21.01.2026 03:24 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Speaking of which... "Most improved player ever" (paraphrased)
#NHLJets

21.01.2026 03:17 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe we shouldn't take the guy that says "we" when he talks about the team's travel as being 100% unbiased.

21.01.2026 03:08 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Is this a bad time to point out the Jets have lost/crashed every game that I've been able to watch live and not on replay since Dec 15?

21.01.2026 02:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@garrethohl is following 20 prominent accounts