cosmopolitran

it's in that catbox link

the source on Stoller should be good

I know this one but it's from 2000

files.catbox.moe/dwzq2a.pdf

I'm supporting Islam on the principle of Polytheism in the sense that multiple religions should be permitted in our society, not claiming the land for themselves but for everyone.

Still it seems its revolutionary potential in middle East is diminished, it's more of a factor in US and EU

It is perpetual because it is driven to reproduce, and I'm not talking about the gross placenta bodies of humans

It reproduces our "desire" to fuck for fun, it's not logical at all

This so called libido, the most persistent non-symbolized force that exists, eternal, irrepressible life motion

Funny you say that, Zizek and co say subject is the perpetual motion machine

Since it was born ex-nihilo from less than nothing, the excess of negativity in life creates a kind of latent potential, like between clouds and ground in thunderstorm

You can sense it but can't see it

I believe there must be Polytheism. Multiple gods. That way there is a plurality in society, and not just one way to be, but there will be no totality. No meta-system which will really unify us, and we'll continue having to resolve differences only on a more self-aware basis.

If your conviction makes you believe all humans could be assimilated under a single principle, you are forgetting about the role of exception. Godel's incompleteness 1. there will be evident truths that your system will incorrectly call lies. You're unconsciously invested in the all right now.

It is not nihilistic. It does not defer meaning indefinitely like postmodernism.

It is Nietzsche's Overman before it got appropriated by the Nazis

Deleuze's plebian guardian of the secret

Psychoanalysis simply accounts for our "gender" here

Sexuation = our modality within eternal recurrence

that's because thought is trapped in antinomies, because everyone unconsciously takes a side, because the 2 sides participate through the 1 mode and kill each other in politics.

psychoanalysis is the only true theory because it doesn't take a side and only proves why there will be no fix

I think this is a mistake, drawing the lines of conflict as woman vs men (or simply as pro woman)

that is still playing by Man's game of 1v1

The conflict is internal on the side of men, in the hierarchies they create that oppress us. that's what we gotta attack

men are the root cause that needs addressing

we need to undo the underlying structure of patriarchy, not just try to fix its consequences

Feminism is FOR women
Feminism is ABOUT men

Here's the psychology take Ti Grace Atkinson used

"us vs. them" is still man's game, regardless of if we're on defense or offense

we need to realize gender/sex antagonism is not the playing field, but the thing which structures it

sexuation tries to get at unconscious process which pushes out of normal (cis/straight) identity, but it applies to everyone

the point is to explain why trans women are true women, the solidarity they share below level of "identity" is their unconscious investment

gender is secretly sexuation

it's not good enough

gay identity is a modern social invention, as is trans... it's behaviors which get reified as "type of being"

the social function captures that "type" into the circuitry of capital, reinscribing us back as idpol consumer subjects, which splits our community

This is no longer a rational individual but an irrational expression of the real, the echo left over by subjectivity which unconsciously sets itself on either side of the up/down active/passive... this is what trans people were supposed to be before Gender Identity dogmatism captured them

This is what identity politics ideology and naive feminism (both lib and rad) DON'T wanna do, as it implies diminishing ego conditioned by society/symbolic... so less status/recognition

you fashion your own quilting point from your trauma, become what Lacan calls a "sinthome"

The Freudian project is the "basic" solution of psychoanalysis primarily applies to male side

control the horny/id better with ego by creating some distance, traverse the fantasy, chill out and live normal etc

the "advanced" psychoanalysis approach is identifying with your symptom in the real

TLDR, there is not just 1 split subject but 2 modalities of it

the social function applies to the subject in a way which overshoots or undershoots the mark of sexual identity/ego, our unconscious chooses which side we take

Copjec's claim is saying that is inner "gender"

bsky.app/profile/eris...

deloozers when a real schizofractal comes at them

we are stuck in our gender/error because of the euthanasia of reason

this is what capitalism does

turns the self-conscious into the conscious

"just zen out mannnnnn, stop trying so much"

this doesn't help

I know what you mean that I seem schizo, the real and symbolic are fusing through me, the imaginary strings of "ego" are unraveling

effort is precisely what we want

you think revolution or progressive change is gonna be easy? we just "flow into it with our desire"?

the point of psychoanalysis is that desire is never simply our own, it's conditioned by society. the less you think, the more it controls you

ok, why transition then?

if you're becoming what u already are and making the best out of it you're a woman

if you choose to separate what u don't wanna be you're a man

the role in sex and group dynamics usually follow same logic, inside/out (total+excesseption/plural+no meta)

"AGP" is the luminiferous ether of sex research, circling drain around the obvious conclusions of psychoanalysis (subject/object is fundamental)

Zizek says woman is like "god of the gaps". wherever science can't explain subjectivity: "there's womaning here-- unexplainable

cognition has mostly been defined by the categories

you are mistaking "perceiving concepts" with "positing concepts"

there is more to thinking than braindead identity shit slinging

Korzybski said the entire verb "to be" is illegitimate to apply on a subject... wrong order of abstraction

yes... "women = bodies" is male type thinking, both incel/trad ideologies AND naive feminism, most radical feminism too

but that is not the real women type thinking, since they are the formless plurality... they're just not all there is (i.e. we can't all be all feminine)

I'm not sure yet, there is something about woman role not being real this it's a pressure point when sincerely leaned on, but this needs to be done self reflexively with this gender modality stuff in mind

otherwise trаnnies are canceled by conservatives+TERFs (all type) logic

this is why D&G and other psychoanalysts (Zupancic, Copjec, Kristeva, McGowan) all have this "become more feminine" thing going on

yes more flattening, that's good, but it can't come by hollowing the bottom out, flattening subject down, stomping on her, laying her under One Dimensional Man

our society has broken Dynamical antinomy, which Copjec equates with "male way of thinking"

too much up. too much line on stocks graph going all up. too much overdeterministic logic.

the collective conscious is eating itself inside out... it's feasting on the self-conscious part of itself