No todos los concerns se publican en blogs. Hay otros foros e interlocutores. Si Google estuviera de acuerdo con cómo se aplica *toda* la DSA no necesitaría, por ejemplo, iniciar acciones legales combatiendo cómo se interpretan algunas de sus obligaciones: eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2...
18.12.2025 12:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Que los códigos de conducta, los mecanismos de respuesta a las crisis o las evaluaciones de riegos sistémicos pueden suponer una injerencia desproporcionada en derechos fundamentales es una cuestión ya descrita constructivamente por doctrina muy autorizada:
libertadinformacion.cc/wp-content/u...
17.12.2025 22:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Sinceramente, no veo tan incompatible compartir los objetivos generales de la DSA con advertir, en un contexto muy diferente a un mero informe de transparencia, de posibles riesgos derivados de interpretaciones maximalistas de algunas obligaciones de diligencia debida.
17.12.2025 22:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0
I am not sure. The territorial scope of the remedy might be different depending on the cause of action. The platform may strategically elect to rely upon the DSA, which guarantees due process, a degree of transparency, or robust redress mechanisms for their users.
10.12.2025 20:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
In fact, wasn't Russmedia a removal request primarily based on defamation and the protection of one's image rights?
10.12.2025 07:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Another operational challenge is determining the appropriate process for handling removal requests that allege multiple personality rights or causes of action, since these claims now appear to necessitate differing legal standards and follow different procedural requirements.
10.12.2025 07:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Please monitor carefully the comments your blog's visitors published, and also if the comments posted can be easily copied and distributed across third-party sites!
02.12.2025 11:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
"132. [...] Moreover, the obligation of the operator of an online marketplace to comply with the requirements arising from the GDPR cannot, in any event, be classified as such a general monitoring obligation."
02.12.2025 11:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0
Notification Detail | TRIS - European Commission
The European Commission finds that the draft of the Spanish Organic Law governing the right to rectification (aimed at regulating influencers on online platforms) is incompatible with EU law (country of origin principle and DSA) technical-regulation-information-system.ec.europa.eu/en/notificat...
22.11.2025 08:34 — 👍 2 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0
Me acabo de enterar. ¡Enhorabuena!
17.09.2025 23:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Lessons from Nepal on the High Cost of Controlling Online Expression | TechPolicy.Press
The Nepalese government attempted to control the information ecosystem and lost control of the state itself, writes Samik Kharel.
After a sweeping social media ban, Nepal saw its bloodiest unrest in decades. What has happened in Nepal is a warning to other democracies to tread carefully with efforts to contain online expression, writes Samik Kharel.
12.09.2025 12:32 — 👍 14 🔁 8 💬 1 📌 2
Judgment Google LLC and Others v. Russia - Judgments and fines against Google breached its free-expression rights hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre-press?i=...
#ECHRpress
08.07.2025 09:22 — 👍 10 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 4
🚀 We’ve joined Bluesky! Stay informed about key rulings, insights, and how #CJEU judgments shape #EUlaw and your daily life. Follow us and stay up to date! ⚖️🌍 #ECJ
24.03.2025 15:56 — 👍 459 🔁 165 💬 15 📌 21
Spain's fight against the illegal streaming of football matches took a bizarre turn last night, as it led to the blocking of websites for at least 49 local governments and the Royal Spanish Academy (RAE), a leading cultural institution. This is unacceptable!
09.03.2025 07:18 — 👍 1 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 1
First AI fair use ruling, but probably of little predictive value for the big pending genAI cases, as it involved an AI developer that copied Westlaw headnotes to train a legal research model to directly compete with Westlaw (at least that's how the court describes it).
11.02.2025 22:46 — 👍 9 🔁 9 💬 3 📌 1
Happy #Lawyercat Anniversary for all who celebrate! It's been four years since the kitten appeared in my Zoom courtroom, and I released the 48 second video that made the whole world laugh. Here is the full video showing the big reveal at the end (in two parts because Blue sky). Enjoy!
09.02.2025 15:08 — 👍 3207 🔁 850 💬 92 📌 134
WikiTok
A TikTok style feed for random Wikipedia articles
So wikitok is pretty neat. TikTok infinite scroll and content exploration meets Wikipedia.
wikitok.net
08.02.2025 15:32 — 👍 143 🔁 51 💬 1 📌 3
The bill wasn't notified to the EC, as required by Directive 2015/1535. Also, I think the obligation to channel rectification requests cannot be imposed on providers established in other Member States due to the ECD's country of origin principle, as interpreted by the CJEU in C-376/22 or C-662/22.
06.02.2025 20:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0
The new obligation for online platforms would be to put a mechanism for the "referral" of the rectification requests directed to users of special relevance and the "monitoring" of the process.
06.02.2025 20:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
It allows for an alternative version of the facts to be disseminated as a "reply". In the event this right is denied by the publisher, a lawsuit can be filed and, ultimately, a judge can order the publication of the counter-narrative, but is not empowered to adjudicate the accuracy of either version
06.02.2025 20:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
The main change in the bill is that it extends the right of rectification beyond traditional media outlets to include "users of special relevance of online platforms and equivalent services". Note this right does not serve to verify the accuracy of certain statements.
06.02.2025 20:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
@gateklons.bsky.social I've just come across this discussion on the Spanish bill to update the law on rectification, which allows individuals to reply to published information that (i) refers to them and (ii) they believe is inaccurate and potentially harmful.
06.02.2025 20:57 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
I think it's a balanced and sophisticated opinion. Reconciling the ECD with the GDPR is not easy. The AG and the EC have openly challenged some of the referring court's assumptions, regarding the categorization of an intermediary as a data controller, rather than just a processor, concerning UGC.
06.02.2025 15:13 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
CURIA - Documents
@daphnek.bsky.social FYI: The Right Tools: Europe’s Intermediary Liability Laws and the EU 2016 General Data Protection Regulation is referenced in paragraphs 155 and 162 of AG Spuznar's opinion in Russmedia Digital curia.europa.eu/juris/docume...
06.02.2025 14:22 — 👍 1 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0
Lawyer specialising in information technology and media law. Independent adviser and researcher. Stockholm, Sweden.
blog.lehofer.at
law / media / telecoms / whatever
international policy director @EFF.org | posts are mine but I share
Official account of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Please see our social media policy here: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/P_91153/
Miembro de la UPF. No digo que sea Batman, sólo que nunca se nos ha visto a la vez en el mismo sitio. Solotildista confeso.
⚖️ abogado penalista | 🤙 del atleti
Lead product for Google AI Studio, working on the Gemini API, and AGI, my views!
Shaping internet policy in Europe. https://doteurope.eu/
Associate Dean for Research & Professor, Santa Clara Law. Internet Law, IP, Advertising Law. He/him. Website: http://www.ericgoldman.org. Email: egoldman@gmail.com
Periodista. Hora 25, Cadena SER.
El podcast de inteligencia artificial
Senior AI Correspondent at MLex. Award-winning reporter focused on digital policy & EU affairs. Ex Euractiv. Bylines at la Repubblica & Tagesspiegel.
Professor of Internet Law, Copenhagen Business School
Connaisseur, hedonista, flâneur, misántropo.