Iβm hacking through the Booker list right now, so hear you. But I selfishly really want to know what you make of Airside!
12.10.2025 23:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@danhartland.bsky.social
Writes, variously. Reviews Editor, Strange Horizons. Columns at Ancillary Review. Songs over at Bandcamp. Also see @savinglives.bsky.social.
Iβm hacking through the Booker list right now, so hear you. But I selfishly really want to know what you make of Airside!
12.10.2025 23:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Some great titles there, so I will restrain myself from telling you to queue-jump it!
12.10.2025 20:04 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Extremely pleased to see this, not least because Gautam is of course an SH comrade. But also, and as I wrote for @sffoundation.bsky.social, The Sentence is a real achievement that deserves a much wider audience - and heralds further goodies to come.
Hooray and congrats all round.
One for the weekend at SH today: @hanacarolina.bsky.social doing some proper thinking about Joey Bateyβs Itβs Not A Cult (@bloomsburyraven.bsky.social).
She argues that the novelβs particular βaesthetic approach β¦ challenges the romanticisation of artists β¦ and sensationalisation of relationships.β
New blog post: on Jordan Prosser's delightfully gonzo debut novel Big Time, which crosses Almost Famous with 1984 and a drug that can make you see the future, and asks: what power does art have during times of fascism? wrongquestions.blogspot.com/2025/10/rece...
09.10.2025 16:47 β π 31 π 8 π¬ 1 π 1Proposal: A Collected Criticism of Graham Greene's film criticism.
09.10.2025 16:53 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Beyond Redfern and Nileena, writers cited in this episode: @chloroformtea.bsky.social, Doris Lessing, @jonathanstrahan.bsky.social, Margaret Atwood @garykwolfe.bsky.social, Sophia Ajram, @indrapramitdas.bsky.social, Ira Levin, @nghivo.bsky.social, @pdjeliclark.bsky.social. And G. Boccaccio, obvs.
09.10.2025 16:02 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβve only just seen this, but βeerie comfortβ seems to me a very apposite phrase.
08.10.2025 21:13 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In the light of this weekβs Critical Friends episode, especially struck by how Electra focuses on both The Witch Roadsβ scale *and* its concision/economy. Her description of this reminds me of why I still love Steph Swainston work - itβs a tough balance to strike, but so productive.
08.10.2025 15:21 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Always happy to carry an Electra Pritchett review - you can rely on her for incisive genre analysis worn enviably lightly.
Case in point, here she is on The Witch Roads by Kate Elliott (@tordotcom.bsky.social): "If epic fantasy is about scale, then Elliott has written the best Iβve read in years."
In which @casella.bsky.social and I both discuss novels of two halves, and in which Nileena Sunil and @yarntheory.bsky.social both sing the praises of @indrapramitdas.bsky.social.
This would be impressive co-working with @mealofthorns.bsky.social had we done any actual co-working.
I'm glad! It's such a rich one that I'm confident we'll return to it in some fashion.
07.10.2025 14:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yep yep. I would be extremely keen to return to this topic - novellas specifically - if some useful texts come along. Will keep my eyes peeled.
07.10.2025 14:40 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Uh-oh, I'm in danger.
07.10.2025 14:34 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Is there a single paradigm of the novella, though? Like my brief nod to Boccaccio in the episode, I think there are a number of novella-types we might select from literary history. But the 19th-century German version seems to me, too, the most identifiably specific.
07.10.2025 14:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 01. This is excellent.
2. As @redfernjon.bsky.social points out, marketing categories are blurry & often arbitrary
3. This is esp. true of SF&F where many of the works labeled as novellas are short novels but arenβt marketed as such
4. More SF&F writers should learn to write actual novellas
Are we talking about needing more SFFnal Sorrows of Young Werther? Because I think you might be talking about needing more SFFnal Sorrows of Young Werther.
07.10.2025 14:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Having now listened to the latest AMoT, I note that both @casella.bsky.social and I spend some time of our respective episodes talking about novels of two halves. Zeitgeists are so uncanny.
(Iβd love to say we plan this stuff. We do not plan this stuff.)
Yes. I should probably have asked Redfern to talk more about the pressures of the market on authors, but it didnβt feel fair.
07.10.2025 11:14 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It was a fun discussion! Plenty more to say, of course - as always.
07.10.2025 10:17 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0You have a point! (You absolutely have a point.)
07.10.2025 09:55 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0(It is not a real thing. This wonβt be the first time you are disappointed in us.)
07.10.2025 09:52 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Have you considered taking the Critical Friends Drabble-to-Trilogy Challenge?
07.10.2025 09:38 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0(SΜΆoΜΆrΜΆrΜΆyΜΆ gΜΆlΜΆaΜΆdΜΆ sΜΆoΜΆrΜΆrΜΆyΜΆ glad to hear it!)
07.10.2025 09:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh crumbs.
(A section of our discussion that was cut from the episode focused on another scholar, Judith Leibowitz [in Narrative Purpose in the Novella], who argued for the novella as a genre (!) defined by the βkind of shaping materialβ it deploys, its βdouble effect of intensity and expansion.β)
Counterpoint: what if a novel is just a novella that is slightly long
07.10.2025 09:06 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0.@redfernjon.bsky.social on reading long and short books critically: "You can have breadth and have that work really well. You can have depth and have that work really well. It's not like there's one direction
"I think itβs really when the novel feels dissatisfying based on what itβs trying to do."
It was a blast, thank you! Also, weβre all really looking forward to that new novel now, so no pressure.
06.10.2025 16:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs not that we knew youβd need us. But itβs that we knew youβd need us.
06.10.2025 16:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0π£ NEW CRITICAL FRIENDS!
In a new ep of the @strangehorizons.bsky.social SFF criticism podcast, I talk with @redfernjon.bsky.social and Nileena Sunil about books that might be longer, and others that could be shorter.
How to read a text that offers too little, or too much, stuff? Some ideas.