inacionline

the damage llms made to the socially acceptable syntactic landscape have been disastrous to the online writing community

landlord is the kind of job where the line between a vulture and a stork is too far to discern

one thing i’ve recurrently noticed with software is that it makes life so easy, that it brings sort of a entitlement feeling in users, whereas something that breaks society today, will be deemed useless if it stops being society-breaking. the weird part is how quickly it happened for llms

people were paying 20 a month for gpt 4, which seems on par with people paying for dsl 20 years ago, even if it was just 2 years ago! who knows where we’ll go

add a friend-tagging system to the reminders and then we are talking

isn't that just the reminders app though?

more papers should be like this

when the the abridged ends are finally justified by the substantially broader means?

funny how interaction networks seem to re-grow node by node even in different digital plains

i would attribute this to the “forum format -> endless algorithmic scroll” and the imposition of character limits. Since you only have [The one board], the prospect of getting lost on it, or worse, to “lose” to someone on it will squeeze the best predicates out of you

to watch the algorithmic threads unfold while you are weaving them

instagram-filter-based chronological identifier

Figure 1: How the path kernel measures similarity between examples. In this two-dimensional illustration, as the weights follow a path on the plane during training, the model’s gradients (vectors on the weight plane) for x, x1 and x2 vary along it. The kernel K(x, x1) is the integral of the dot product of the gradients ∇wy(x) and ∇wy(x1) over the path, and similarly for K(x, x2). Because on average over the weight path ∇wy(x) · ∇wy(x1) is greater than ∇wy(x) · ∇wy(x2), y1 has more influence than y2 in predicting y, all else being equal.

i mean, look

if it's based, it's no longer in the cloud

as big as it needed to be (maybe too big at times)

from the folder: "papers that make something click"

arxiv.org/pdf/2012.00152

there is a specific tongue used exclusively by reply/spambots that represents something profound about the way we connect and present to others that still needs to be looked into

agreed, past-induced cringe is evolutionary, we should embrace it more

nice try

I always found it funny that the way we train AI models, by trying to render them as errors-free as possible, to allow them to more reliably replace humans at some tasks, is so contrastive to our clumsy nature, that it won't necessarily make them "perfect replacements"

this bag would be a good thread tbh

yeah sorry i just chimed in, but yes, it ringed a bell to this post, basically, notch picked the parts people liked about infiniminer, and made what-would-be minecraft. my first pick from “the-inspired-prevails” bag

Infiniminer – Minecraft Wiki Infiniminer is an open source multiplayer block-based sandbox building and digging game, inspired by the games Infinifrag, Team Fortress 2, and Motherload,[1] in which the player plays as a mi...

minecraft.wiki/w/Infiniminer

another one to the folder of “the-inspired-prevails” files

Feel-your-way-through-UIs

Haptics should not only be more ubiquitous, but should be shaped by the magnitude of the action. Like a post? small vibration. Delete a database? Now we’re talking

“struggle-based optimization” also has a nice ring

*all* art is basically adding and subtracting latent vectors to reach a desired location of semantic meaning in the end

“visible mending” but in the software sense — the patches are the solutions anyways

slightly related, but if I am following it right, I think you are describing scenarios where people defend their thesis, and at the same time, demonstrate how even if adversarial ones were viable, they'd be obviously less favourable. In a sense that, if one cross the line, they're "far-too-gone"