Not that I have any real problem with buying the paperback. Just harder to read in bed
โช@adapalmer.bsky.socialโฌ
@eaterofsun.bsky.social
Author, Editor @ The Economist, Chair @ The Degrees Initiative. Climate change, planetarity, critical zones, tv, burdens of life, etc. Reposts are not endorsements
Not that I have any real problem with buying the paperback. Just harder to read in bed
โช@adapalmer.bsky.socialโฌ
It seems that "Too Like the Lightning" by Ada Palmer is available on Kindle in the US but not in the UK. Anyone have any insight into this?
03.08.2025 21:44 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Corrections of specific claims in the DoE "Critical Review" of climate science.
I'll start off w/Tamino on "U.S. tide gauge measurements reveal no obvious acceleration in sea-level rise".
Add other examples and we can build a thread.
tamino.wordpress.com/2025/08/03/s...
The report is "tedious" and at times "truly wearisome", according to Bob Kopp, a climate scientist at Rutgers University. Kopp recently worked on a paper showing how rising temperatures and drought will worsen crop yields, counter to the report's claims that crops will flourish with extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. "Carbon dioxide fertilization is largely irrelevant to how increasingly extreme heat and intense drought will impact crop yields," Kopp said. "As a former department of energy fellow, I'm embarrassed by this report."
Iโm tired and no longer capable of being measured when speaking to reportersโฆ
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
That's just one of many instances of distortion and misinformation in the US Department of Energy "Critical Review on the Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions".
Which in fact is a fossil fuel propaganda scam.
Let's hope Americans are not that easily fooled.
tamino.wordpress.com/2025/08/03/s...
What happened to Danny Strong's Guys and Dolls script?
02.08.2025 13:22 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Ellen Ripley and Facehugger in American Gothic by Grant Wood.
making great art even better: thread
02.08.2025 12:14 โ ๐ 1254 ๐ 284 ๐ฌ 25 ๐ 26The @nature.com paper describing their findings is here.
02.08.2025 10:19 โ ๐ 75 ๐ 10 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0Cool! -- congratulations.
Not sure it will be one of your ten things, but one of the things I would like to know is what the effects of a Tambora style VEI7 would be on PV electricity generation worldwide.
Chart showing the Keeling curve rising (with annual oscillations) from under 320ppm CO2 in 1960 to well over 420ppm today
Unemployment numbers are not the only ones the Trump administration wants out of sight and out of mind. Very fine @economist.com "By Invitation" op ed by Ralph Keeling www.economist.com/by-invitatio...
02.08.2025 10:26 โ ๐ 13 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1If you donโt count covid victims people wonโt die.
If you donโt measure carbon the temperature wonโt rise.
If you fudge unemployment numbers the economy will soar.
Our fool is building his paradise
If this is the first administration fully immersed in AI, what does it mean that all its decisions are so terminally stupid?
02.08.2025 09:23 โ ๐ 151 ๐ 22 ๐ฌ 7 ๐ 3well duh: 330 more....
02.08.2025 10:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0If I can just get 5,000 people to come and see me doing my tour show I can leave the comedy circuit to carry on without me, and move over to touring, permanently. I got 1,800 people to buy tickets for the last tour, Iโm aiming to sell 2,500 this time
02.08.2025 07:18 โ ๐ 43 ๐ 14 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This is gorgeous.
What is the artwork and who is the artist?
www.nature.com/articles/s41... Obviously itโs not impossible for lasers to evolve through natural selection โ but it is very cool that they have
01.08.2025 22:11 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Photo of a shorebird on a cloudy day, near the water's edge. It has a heavily streaked breast that ends with a clean line at its white belly, black bill and legs, wings look longer than tail, I think?
ID question, Birdsky! I saw this shorebird on the lakefront in Chicago mid-May, apparently, but just noticed it in photos now. Is this a Pectoral Sandpiper, or am I imagining that? #birds
01.08.2025 22:18 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0London is increasingly under Shania law. And that don't impress me much.
01.08.2025 21:41 โ ๐ 562 ๐ 64 ๐ฌ 36 ๐ 1My wife has the good fortune to have absolutely no chance of seeing that grifting, con man charlatan Farage for a few days
She's taking the grandkids to Clacton for a weekend by the sea
More chance of spotting Bigfoot
The firing of the BLS Commissioner, favorable treatment of Maxwell, intimidation of the universitiesโa notable week on the slide to a banana republic.
01.08.2025 21:08 โ ๐ 1870 ๐ 461 ๐ฌ 93 ๐ 29Spellechecke will replayce a word wyth a totallye uneeded differente worde but will no longer add a little apostrophe to "Im" to helpe me out. Thou hadst but one jobbe, spellechecke.
01.08.2025 20:24 โ ๐ 222 ๐ 34 ๐ฌ 6 ๐ 6Also, I want to visit the timeline in which thereโs a film of The Demolished Man starring Humphrey Bogart
01.08.2025 22:24 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Bucket list!
01.08.2025 22:24 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0www.nature.com/articles/s41... Obviously itโs not impossible for lasers to evolve through natural selection โ but it is very cool that they have
01.08.2025 22:11 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The "More from Variety" display at the bottom of an article that highlights content readers might be interested in. It features six stories, all of which are about Sydney Sweeney
Variety's algorithm is all in on Sydney Sweeney...
01.08.2025 13:53 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Substitute for Luxardo aperitivo: Aperol? or Select?
01.08.2025 18:54 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0missing "hope" -- I hope you enjoy it
01.08.2025 18:53 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0"NASA biplanes usher in a brave new world of low-velocity low-altitude aviation"
01.08.2025 17:49 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0No words!
#motonormativity
www.guardian.co.tt/news/700-dis...
Excerpt from linked-to post: Text reads: First, the authors write that โTol (2017) estimates that the private benefit of carbon is large relative to the social cost.โ This paper was never published in a peer-reviewed journal and is therefore not admissible by the rules of the US government. The paper was peer-reviewed and rejected, because my private benefit is an average whereas the social cost is a marginal. The two cannot be compared (unless you make a ridiculous assumption about linearity). I still hope to fix the paper one day. As it stands, however, the comparison is wrong.
Good post by @richardtol.bsky.social -- a robust explanation of three of what appear to be many misinterpretations of cited papers in the recent Department of Energy "critical review".
This bit feels particularly admirable:
richardtol.substack.com/p/is-climate...