I heard from righties and lefties that bitcoin was a hedge against the dollar, but they often rise and fall simultaneously. Maybe Iβm missing some nuance.
06.02.2026 12:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@willtpoker.bsky.social
Recovering Lawyer. Poker Player.
I heard from righties and lefties that bitcoin was a hedge against the dollar, but they often rise and fall simultaneously. Maybe Iβm missing some nuance.
06.02.2026 12:33 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Pardon the Interruption but this is State Media now.
04.02.2026 14:11 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So many lawyers would say that same thing if you gave them truth serum. Itβs why I got out, and I am grateful to have left. If Iβd have had anyone other than myself to support, Iβd still be doing it.
04.02.2026 05:58 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0When you want to be a public official for the power part but not the public service part.
02.02.2026 17:03 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0βJudges cite literatureβ is a sleight of hand defense that suggests that theyβre just as likely to cite other religious texts as they sign off. You know thatβs not true. The principle at issue doesnβt need a sectarian rationale or defense.
01.02.2026 13:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I accept that your view has carried the day, but I disagree that it is more acceptable - and less sectarian - by virtue of how well-known and predominant Christianity is in our culture. The same principle defended with a citation to the Quran or the Vedas would not be defended on the same grounds.
01.02.2026 13:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I understand what it is.
What if he signed every Order with βJesus is Lordβ?
What if a different judge signed off on an Order with βJesus was full of shit.β
To me, all of those examples are unreasonably sectarian and promote a particular religious position.
I miss the Lemon Test.
01.02.2026 03:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I understand Iβm losing the forest for the trees here, but doesnβt a judge citing to the Gospels in his signature plausibly violate the Establishment Clause?
31.01.2026 22:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Why would this headline not just be βVideos Contradictβ¦β
What do they gain by equivocating?
Imagine if theyβd let ACC Champ Duke in. Wouldβve been dominant.
09.01.2026 01:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0As a half-assed Panthers fan but full-assed contrarian, I kind of want the Falcons beating the Saints to decide the thing.
03.01.2026 17:44 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I think TV commentators are the most overrated thing in college football and am increasingly distraught that we do not have a stadium-sounds-only option when watching.
02.01.2026 16:50 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The team Jones is the President of is the only NFC squad not to have made an NFC title game this century.
So I appreciate his contribution to debunking the notion that wealth is correlated with competence.
I wonder if Iβve become Orwellian, bc I see being recorded in most public settings as a safety net. Iβm good with there being a record of where I was and when.
30.12.2025 14:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I want to see 43-year-old LeBron James lead the Akron Zips to a Sweet Sixteen.
28.12.2025 05:23 β π 31 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Sir, may I interest you in a Slop-Tart?
27.12.2025 16:07 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Trust the process?
27.12.2025 03:23 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Most βbroken,β struggling people donβt become fascists. Fascism doesnβt provide a better life for most people who fit that description. The fact that anyone may be struggling to achieve a βreasonably satisfying lifeβ cannot be an implicit attack on their values or politics. That is lazy.
23.12.2025 03:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0How can you lose something you never had in the first place?
14.12.2025 23:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0We need a stadium sounds only option for all sports broadcasts. Thereβs almost no meritocracy in broadcasting, because if you want to watch the game, youβre stuck listening to whomever they throw in the booth.
12.12.2025 04:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Right. 1969-2024 counts as part of that metric.
08.12.2025 04:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 01969 was 56 years ago. For comparisonβs sake, that was eleven years before Mississippi State refused an offer to Jerry Rice.
Pretending like pre-1969 is representative of Notre Dameβs status quo approach to Bowl Games in 2025 is silly.
Maybe, but maybe Notre Dame isnβt classy or dignified enough to deserve the Pop-Tarts Bowl experience.
08.12.2025 03:52 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Youβre the one who made the βevery other sportβ argument. You brought other sports into this discussion and now youβre objecting to the comparison.
08.12.2025 03:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0There were so many rivalry games that proved this point last week. Eg: 4-7 Wisconsin at 6-5 Minnesota in an ugly game in the snow was kind of awesome.
08.12.2025 03:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0βLike every other sport.β
Notre Dameβs basketball team accepted an NIT bid as recently as 2018.
No thread of your argument holds up, even by your own made-up standards.
That has not been Notre Dameβs position, historically. Are you calling for the abolition of all Bowl games other than the CFP or are you refusing to acknowledge youβre engaging in special pleading for Notre Dame?
08.12.2025 03:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Was a title not the goal before expansion?
08.12.2025 03:09 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah? Then why didnβt they decline the Sun Bowl in 2023 on that logic? Or the Gator Bowl in 2022?
Havenβt won a title since β88 and act like a title is status quo.