's Avatar

@shredhq.bsky.social

116 Followers  |  47 Following  |  161 Posts  |  Joined: 25.11.2024  |  2.9346

Latest posts by shredhq.bsky.social on Bluesky

Sabotage?

21.11.2025 13:31 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

AI has reached the Singularity and will no longer take instructions from human coding overseers. Superintelligence in action.

21.11.2025 04:03 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Interesting & scary point.

By including them in his crime spree, he intertwines them to him. They're all stuck with him for what they feel is self-preservation.

He will continue to seek loyalists that follow illegal orders. If he can staff his ranks with them, the next coup might succeed.

21.11.2025 03:42 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Appreciated when you described this in your recent video conclusion with Renato.

Turns out Maga puts their anti-pedo identity in a higher plane and gives it priority over simple maga loyalty.

21.11.2025 03:09 — 👍 10    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Note the guess above about Ms Piggy identity was incorrect.

I'm glad the media picked up this story & covered it with the same indignation that we felt. The late night comedians all covered it & appropriately tore Trump a new 1. It is still being covered & WH spokespeople are digging grave more.

21.11.2025 03:05 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Or start a gofundme.

20.11.2025 02:58 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

What if it turns out Trump is a snitch?

In the mafia world he lives in, what if he was the rat who was cooperating with Epstein investigators?

Does he get a pass because he was helping take down a pedophile?

Seems to me that in the world of crime a rat is a rat is a rat?

Is this what he fears?

20.11.2025 02:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Goes beyond this simple case of vindictiveness. It's across the board GOP authoritarian overreach getting shut down by the Courts.

Abrego. Chicago. Portland. Tariffs. Loss after loss after loss. A generation of patiently implementing unitary exec & taking power under a long term vision thrown away

19.11.2025 21:28 — 👍 11    🔁 2    💬 3    📌 0

It's as if Trump, Heritage, Federalist Society, Fox & the GOP implemented Phase IV (the Trump Card) prematurely.

Phase III which includes the complete infiltration of the Judiciary w loyalists was incomplete.

What prompted them to move hastily without having complete reign over Courts?

19.11.2025 20:53 — 👍 8    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Bummer.

19.11.2025 20:20 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

If the Orange turd ignored the Judge's reach, Congress must impeach.

LFG!

19.11.2025 20:01 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

That's not what happened here though. At all

The full GJ originally voted against Count 1 & in favor of Counts 2 & 3.

The question that arose today is whether the govt is required to present the redrafted indictment to the full GJ and have them deliberate again & take another vote. Yes it seems.

19.11.2025 19:39 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Many are confused based off a partial snip of the Judge's earlier decision. This section more fully encompasses what the Judge understood & decided.

19.11.2025 19:06 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Incorrect.

bsky.app/profile/empt...

19.11.2025 18:49 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

bsky.app/profile/rpar...

19.11.2025 18:41 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

And I would have gotten away with it, if it hadn't been for you meddling kids!

19.11.2025 18:35 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Had to look that up.

There's also a chance that the Judge refers the lawyer to the Bar. I think that would come with far more gravitas than a consumer watchdog group. I'll be looking for that along with you.

19.11.2025 18:28 — 👍 0    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

They presented the no-bill to the Judge straight-up. Here is the relevant portion of the transcript the day of.
The only thing they were trying to cover up was their own incompetence. Bondi signed off 2x that she reviewed & approved Halligan's actions.

bsky.app/profile/empt...

19.11.2025 18:25 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

They have a different definition of merit.

19.11.2025 18:13 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Putin is patting himself on the back.

19.11.2025 18:09 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Watchdog Files Bar Complaint Against Interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan By prosecuting James Comey and Letitia James despite a dearth of evidence that either committed any crimes, Halligan appears to have violated Bar rules.

They'll certainly be adding more to this Bar complaint. It's awfully sad that is politicized too.

campaignforaccountability.org/watchdog-fil...

19.11.2025 18:07 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

There's no hiding it. It's a public record. (Unless it is sealed) Sure Prejudicial for the defendant if a no billed charge remains on the indictment in court. Leave the denied child molestation charge on there to turn the jurors against the defendant.
Judge reviewed no bill day of GJ vote here.

19.11.2025 18:03 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Well, obviously not. I mean mid-term elections are a year from now and Dems would first need to win the House despite gerrymanders and voter oppression. It's just looking at possibilities how we might see DOJ misconduct since this case is ending as soon the next two weeks.

19.11.2025 17:55 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

If Comey pursues civil damages in Court against DOJ for their vindictive prosecution a lot of DOJs shenanigans will be exposed. But that takes a long time to play out. Democratic controlled House hearings could be revealing of pursued.

19.11.2025 17:42 — 👍 5    🔁 2    💬 2    📌 0
Home - emptywheel

That's why emptywheel.net was sad this case wouldn't likely make it very far. Everyone would like to see the corrupt DOJ fully exposed for the idiots they are. OTOH you've got a man racking up legal bills with a top notch team so you kinda want him to be free from everything hanging over him asap.

19.11.2025 17:39 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The shortcuts are not how it works though.

19.11.2025 17:14 — 👍 25    🔁 0    💬 3    📌 0

No. Not really. Halligan thought she could save everyone a little time by not going over the new indictment again. She had two counts that passed so she wanted to get those in the bag.

Remember she never had Grand Jury procedural training & winged it w staff refusal to join her. A man's liberty.

19.11.2025 17:12 — 👍 77    🔁 3    💬 3    📌 0

If I was Lemons and my DOJ bosses gave me those orders, I would make sure they put that in writing.
It's obstructive. Just not sure if it's criminal.

19.11.2025 16:55 — 👍 17    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Fighter jets. Nuclear technology. Drones.

19.11.2025 01:39 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Bondi is about to step into the biggest hurricane of her life.

19.11.2025 01:34 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@shredhq is following 20 prominent accounts