With Navin Tsung and collaborators, we show how magnetic fields can effectively suppress gravitational instability and fragmentation in AGN accretion disks.
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21991
@philip-armitage.bsky.social
Astrophysicist at Flatiron CCA & Stony Brook working on accretion and planet formation. Also Mr. Pisconti / Nico’s dad / hiker / Zwifter / (lapsed) photographer
With Navin Tsung and collaborators, we show how magnetic fields can effectively suppress gravitational instability and fragmentation in AGN accretion disks.
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21991
A timely paper for #HWO25: is it enough to find Earth-like planets around other nearby stars? No! We need their planetary system contexts. Does life on Earth depend on Jupiter?
@sabinastro.bsky.social led this nice analysis of HWO requirements to detect Earths + Jupiters.
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21443
Me and hubby discussing the new LIGO discovery of ginormous merging black holes.
Me to 3 yo: Nico, do you like black holes?
3 yo: No, I like YouTube.
Hubby: well, that's kinda a hybrid black/white hole: light comes out but no information 🤣
Happy #NerdyTuesday! 🧪
@philip-armitage.bsky.social
In work led by Alessandro Ruzza, we use a new simulation-based inference approach to estimate masses of disk embedded planets from ALMA data.
arxiv.org/abs/2506.11200
From today’s ethics training I learned that the threshold for a nominal gift in New York State is $15. The temptation to ask about jumbo jets was strong…
27.05.2025 19:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thread on our simulation work on circumplanetary disks, led by @sabinastro.bsky.social with Alexandra Kuznetsova and Yan-Fei Jiang from @flatironinstitute.org. We’re working to understand when such disks form, and what their structure looks like as we zoom in closer to the planet.
23.05.2025 12:28 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0You’re being generous: of course I didn’t even consider it overdue at all until a year after the deadline!
23.05.2025 12:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0😂🤣
18.05.2025 00:55 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0For most papers, reviewers are still responding pretty generously to my requests (thanks!).
No doubt though: “routine” results are not communicated as concisely as in the past. It’s become vastly easier to do many analyses, which is good but adds to the review work a lot.
If you too are experiencing mental health issues due to the ongoing shitshow, please DM me or Signal me at ziadadina.19, I am trying to build a community to help each other.
Y'all, please repost and help me out, this is serious stuff
Revised version of a new, short (-ish!) review on planet formation theory:
arxiv.org/abs/2412.11064
New paper, led by the amazing @becastro.bsky.social (with Jeremy Smallwood, Andrew Winter, @astrohoss.bsky.social, and others). In which we try to understand the formation of the crazy-looking young planetary system IRAS04125... 🤔 🔭
arxiv.org/abs/2504.07182
Daniel Carrera, Linn Eriksson and collaborators study a “hybrid” mode of planetesimal formation, in which the growth of dust in vortices ultimately drives the system into the collapse regime of streaming instability parameter space.
arxiv.org/abs/2504.06332