Mark Nottingham's Avatar

Mark Nottingham

@mnot.net.bsky.social

Co-chair IETF HTTP & AIPREF working groups, member Internet Architecture Board (again), standards lead at Cloudflare. Former W3C TAG, W3C BoD. Interested in the intersection of legal regulation and technical standards. https://www.mnot.net

809 Followers  |  115 Following  |  87 Posts  |  Joined: 26.05.2023  |  1.5514

Latest posts by mnot.net on Bluesky

Post image

Mad.

22.07.2025 13:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 29.06.2025 16:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I guess you could say that things are getting serious… #ietf https://www.ietf.org/blog/ai-pref-progress/

28.06.2025 17:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 28.06.2025 13:55 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@pluralistic perhaps the amount of power that monopolists amass scares even those with masses of power.

28.06.2025 13:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

More than anything, the latest Supreme Court ruling signifies a disruption of the structure of American law -- nothing is safe anymore. https://music.apple.com/au/album/nothing-is-safe/1473856273?i=1473856276

28.06.2025 09:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

result, this opinion is another example of how the Supreme Court keeps playing Calvinball with our civil liberties." https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2025/06/prof-goldmans-statement-on-the-supreme-courts-demolition-of-the-internet-in-free-speech-coalition-v-paxton.htm

28.06.2025 09:35 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"The Supreme Court took a wrecking ball to Internet Law today in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton. The majority (disingenuously) overturned two critical decades-old precedents restricting online age authentication [...]. By upending long-standing and well-settled rules to reach a pro-censorship

28.06.2025 09:35 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"non-US citizens" = brown people

12.06.2025 03:53 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Is AI a useful option for policymakers who want to evaluate open standards? Let's take a look. https://www.mnot.net/blog/2025/06/04/using_ai

05.06.2025 01:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

So, Google just launched a major new AI demo that requires people to relax their browser security settings. Wow.

21.05.2025 00:59 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

distributedβ€”may gain significant advantages." https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/05/trumps-trade-war-risks-splintering-the-internet-experts-warn/

20.05.2025 22:29 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"A surprising potential consequence of digital tariffs could be the accelerated development and adoption of open-source technologies," Shah wrote. "As proprietary digital products and services become subject to cross-border tariffs, open-source alternativesβ€”which can be freely shared, modified, and

20.05.2025 22:29 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 17.05.2025 08:05 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Technopolar Paradox The frightening fusion of tech power and state power.

This reminds me of Ian Bremmer's piece in Foreign Affairs: www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...

... but that one is a bit less hopeful.

14.05.2025 22:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

authority accrues to those who control the digital space, it may matter less whether power resides in public or private hands than how effectively it can be centralized." https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/technopolar-paradox-ian-bremmer-fusion-tech-state-power

14.05.2025 00:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Yet beneath their ideological differences, the American and Chinese models are converging in function. One is driven by market logic, the other by political imperativesβ€”but both prioritize efficiency over accountability, control over consent, and scale over individual rights. In a world where

14.05.2025 00:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Stanley Tucci for pope. #tucci25

26.04.2025 21:51 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Aha. Yes, you have to separately go in and set up the keyboard. How bizarre!

26.04.2025 02:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

many experts in language and internationalisation.

Someone, somewhere at Apple made a conscious decision to push Australian language more towards the US. They’re culture hacking us.

25.04.2025 23:05 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Set your iPhone language to β€œEnglish (Australia)” and then try to type some words.

Realize aluminum color

Those are American spellings.

For a company that obsessively auto capitalizes (argh capitalises) words like β€œFaceTime” and β€œApple”, it’s hard to see this as unintentional. They employ

25.04.2025 23:05 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

Please do.

25.04.2025 09:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Breaking big tech's hold over people's experience of the Internet is not "breaking the Internet." https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/brewing-transatlantic-tech-war

03.04.2025 07:30 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Koji hard shake!

02.04.2025 17:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

rests on openness, consensus, and lack of dominance erodes the power of that very system. It ensures that information β€” which, as we know, is power β€” is a public good." https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-anti-capitalist-case-for-standards/

28.03.2025 04:28 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"We therefore suggest that one of the most pragmatic anti-capitalist things that one can do is to push for any organizations that you might be involved with to participate in the standards development process. Encouraging organizations within a capitalist system to participate in a process that

28.03.2025 04:28 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Rongros

16.03.2025 02:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Almost 90% of the nuclear warheads in the world are now effectively controlled by one man.

28.02.2025 20:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Very relevant piece from @coopdanger on why divesting Chrome from Google isn't the end of the Web. https://www.techpolicy.press/the-true-cost-of-browser-innovation-why-chromes-divestiture-wouldnt-end-the-open-web/

26.02.2025 01:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I thought it was mistitled -- the movie wasn't about civil war, it was about the tensions and ethics of photojournalism.

I loved it (as a former photojournalist).

23.02.2025 22:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

@mnot.net is following 19 prominent accounts