Novelty is not an important factor in most reading.
Used book stores are your friend.
@mtobis.bsky.social
PhD atmospheric/oceanic sciences 1996 but a bit rusty. Opinionated. Main topics: climate, sustainability, Canada, AI and ML, journalism. Also: roots music, art, healthy plant-based food. Please think like a planet! https://initforthegold.blogspot.com
Novelty is not an important factor in most reading.
Used book stores are your friend.
There are a lot of great books that were published before βAIβ. Read those.
Bonus: you can find copies that fit in your pocket and save your battery life.
Reading an old Samuel Delaney novel and a historical biography of Lucretia Borgia in pulp paperback format at the moment.
Worthwhile thread; a climate / AI connection that is new to me.
07.02.2026 22:51 β π 7 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Bruce Fanjoy has launched a petition to require all federal party leaders to obtain and maintain top security clearance.
It's open for a couple of months.
www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en...
Person: say, i am alive. Computer: I am alive. Person: oh my god.
01.02.2026 23:48 β π 22536 π 4963 π¬ 82 π 127#graphicdujour
31.01.2026 04:04 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1witchcraft
31.01.2026 01:54 β π 87 π 4 π¬ 3 π 0Mark Carney's Net-Favourables:
π’ All: +24%
π’ATL: +42%
π’QC: +40%
π’BC: +27%
π’ON: +18%
π’AB: +7%
π’SK/MB: +5%
π’Women: +25%
π’Men: +22%
π’18-29 Year Olds: +32%
π’30-44 Year Olds: +9%
π’45-59 Year Olds: +19%
π’60+ And Older: +34%
Abacus Data / Jan 27, 2026
After a lawsuit was filed in late December by the renewable energy sector, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wiped references to the ban from government websites and is now once again sending wind farms what were once routine permits, I can confirm
30.01.2026 19:59 β π 40 π 5 π¬ 1 π 0"A federal judge on Friday ruled the Energy Department violated the law when Secretary Chris Wright handpicked five researchers who reject the scientific consensus on climate change to work in secret on a sweeping government report on global warming."
Gift link.
I came here to say this! βοΈ
People of the world take note: If your "leaders" don't have a sense of humour, do not vote for them.
π€£ PM Mark Carney at the Canadian Media Industry event re Hudson Williams #Canada π
30.01.2026 02:32 β π 273 π 83 π¬ 29 π 20Dear climate scientist friends, would anyone care to check out slides 17-22 in the link below and give me a quick gut check on a very simple climate model aimed at conveying the basics to engineering students? Interested in any feedback folks may have.
29.01.2026 00:58 β π 13 π 7 π¬ 3 π 1It would take a lot of work as some of the points are well outside my expertise.
27.01.2026 20:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I have made this exact point myself.
Iβm not trying to defend the documentary, just encouraging people to offer evidence when they reject nonsense.
Just saying itβs nonsense comes across as arrogant, arguing from authority. Itβs tricky to be actually helpful in the face of pseudoscience.
I am unfamiliar with the material and would appreciate a link.
27.01.2026 14:43 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0It would be useful if you provided a brief rebuttal of the other points as well. Thanks.
27.01.2026 14:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I think single event attribution is not a good use of our attentions. Itβs easy to see why people are always looking for a simple cause/effect when something unusually disruptive occurs.
But in the end the circumstances call for more resilience, regardless of causes of individual disasters.
This is just confirmation bias vs confirmation bias. The actual science can vary a lot on attribution and attribution confidence from one event to another. In the end itβs just the wrong question, though.
The stable climate of the past is over. We have to expect the unexpected.
I donβt know as this needs a conspiracy to explain..
We will never see another major natural disaster without this debate βexactly as predicted by all-seeing scientistsβ bs βobviously completely normalβ.
People have blamed volcanoes on climate change! Others have denied any link to forest fires!
On the whole Iβm more interested in the adaptation events that the post-storm week will reveal.
This could be memorable, even historic. Big recovery problems are a realistic scenario to be concerned about.
Cold outbreak/ disrupted jetstream? Not necessarily more likely in a changed climate. Disputed among experts. Tired of seeing this posed as consensus.
More moisture available to exacerbate the clash of airmasses? Yes. Clearly exacerbated by climate change.
So, a complicated climatological story.
If this storm is as severe and consequential as people are suggesting, the recovery process will depend to a considerable extent on the capacities and resources of the US federal government.
Watching with interest.
Wishing the many affected people good luck and strength.
That is not how it works. The seasons donβt have momentum or anything comparable.
23.01.2026 23:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Definitely not. Possibly more arctic outbreaks though the evidence is not compelling. But winters are unambiguously warming up, largely due to ice albedo feedback.
23.01.2026 23:13 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No. Thereβs no consensus on whether this is a real trend and if so why. The evidence is thin.
(No Iβm not a denier. Iβve been trying to call attentoon to climate disruption since around 1990.)
Of all people, you should be representing the science correctly!
Adults: I may not love Carney, but that was a pretty darn respectable speech.
Brian Lilley: He didn't even praise Trump or eat an apple loudly!
The UK government has quietly released a report entitled
"Global biodiversity loss, ecosystem collapse and national security"
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696e0e...
Notable for Canada: a "realistic possibility of collapse" of the Canadian boreal forest ecosystem starting as soon as 2030
Powerful Guardian editorial on urgent need for #climate adaptation & for βreal plans, real finance, real justiceβ. And good to see shout out to work of @climatemajority.bsky.social & GlacierTrust showing adaptation as both essential in itself & as a spur to greater decarbonisationπ
27.12.2025 17:26 β π 183 π 74 π¬ 2 π 3