Sue Then's Avatar

Sue Then

@archelove.bsky.social

In My Joy Era #SussexSquad

460 Followers  |  597 Following  |  32 Posts  |  Joined: 17.11.2024  |  2.0505

Latest posts by archelove.bsky.social on Bluesky


The look on Meghan's face πŸ˜…πŸ˜

11.02.2025 03:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why would they think this would bother Meghan at all? Meghan would be more than happy and encourage any charity. They're projecting their own pettiness.

30.01.2025 18:41 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Shell egg is very porous though

27.01.2025 02:42 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

The irony, huh!

22.01.2025 19:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's the old British civil law called Part 36 Offer. It was initially meant to prevent lengthy and costly trials, but ended up benefiting wealthy defendant. It penalizes claimant who refused to settle

22.01.2025 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Murdoch worth billions and is one of the most powerful media mogul in the world. Harry is not exactly small fish, but his net worth differs significantly compared to Murdoch. 50 millions vs 20 billions on a rigged system is not a joke

22.01.2025 19:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The legal rule that means even Hugh Grant can’t afford to take his case to trial The civil procedure rules on settlement are preventing true access to justice.

This happened to so many who sue the likes of Murdoch
theconversation.com/the-legal-ru...

22.01.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

UK civil law penalizes parties who refuse to settle. Even if the claimant wins the case, if the amount awarded by the judge is even a penny less than the settlement offer made by wealthy defendant like Murdoch, the claimant becomes liable to pay both sides' legal costs.

22.01.2025 18:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

So many claimants ended up settled because of this. Siena Miller in 2011 and Hugh Grant recently

22.01.2025 18:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I take pleasure knowing that part of the settlement can be used to fight the fail

22.01.2025 18:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

It's not that simple. Harry is not just against Murdoch, he's against the system that has been rigged to favour billionaires.

22.01.2025 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

1. Murdoch won't go bankrupt even if Harry won. In fact, chances are Harry would go bankrupt even if he won.

2. Harry's winning alone won't fix the system. It's also not his job to fix the system. The trial dossier has been passed to the authority, so it's up to them to start fixing the system

22.01.2025 18:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

β€œI once said that the big beasts of the tabloid jungle have no predators, I was wrong they have Prince Harry. His bravery and astonishing courage has brought accountability to a part of the media world that thought it was untouchable.” - Lord Watson.

#PrinceHarry

22.01.2025 16:59 β€” πŸ‘ 104    πŸ” 37    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 3
Part 36 of the civil procedure rules is designed to create a financial incentive for either party in litigation to accept reasonable settlement offers made in civil disputes, rather than proceeding to trial. The rules require the courts, in almost all circumstances, to financially penalise a party that does not accept what retrospectively proves to be a reasonable offer.

In Grant’s case, this meant that, if he had won at trial and the court had awarded damages that were even a penny less than the settlement offer, he would have been ordered to pay the majority of the legal costs of both sides.

Part 36 of the civil procedure rules is designed to create a financial incentive for either party in litigation to accept reasonable settlement offers made in civil disputes, rather than proceeding to trial. The rules require the courts, in almost all circumstances, to financially penalise a party that does not accept what retrospectively proves to be a reasonable offer. In Grant’s case, this meant that, if he had won at trial and the court had awarded damages that were even a penny less than the settlement offer, he would have been ordered to pay the majority of the legal costs of both sides.

The system is rigged that even if Harry won, he can be liable to pay for BOTH sides legal cost. This is why many have been forced to settled. Harry did his part, a dossier has been passed and it's up to the police to step up

theconversation.com/the-legal-ru...

22.01.2025 17:57 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Get over it. Harry will never pick you

22.01.2025 17:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If the settlement amount is even a cent higher than the awarded judgment, Harry wpuld have to pay for BOTH sides costs. The system is rigged

22.01.2025 17:34 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I read it was 8 figure settlement. It is satisfying because we know the money will be used to fight the daily fail, another trash media

22.01.2025 17:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

There is no accountability because the system is rigged for the likes of Murdoch, not because Harry and others preferred money

22.01.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The system is rigged, Harry did his best under this circumstances. If he goes to full trial, and the judgment amount is less than the settlement offered, he would have to pay legal cost for both sides even though he won

22.01.2025 17:21 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The system is rigged so that Harry and others in the same place have to settle.

22.01.2025 17:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So, in actuality, if Prince Harry WINS, but the judgement amount is smaller than the "massive" settlement offer, then he LOSES. He would have to pay the legal costs for *both* sides (even though he won).

The system is geared for people like Murdoch, right?

#SussexSquad

22.01.2025 03:49 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 20    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 5

Essentially, Harry and Tom Watson are so hellbent on having their day in court that they are taking on an enormous financial risk in a bid to get both vindication for themselves and a ruling that the Sun was involved in illegal activity, to break the idea it was just the News of the World..

19.01.2025 15:01 β€” πŸ‘ 174    πŸ” 31    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

I'm there too. Can I follow you there too?

19.01.2025 17:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

TikTok, like any other social media platforms, has a wide variety of content. If you keep seeing daft videos, it's because the algorithm learned that you prefer or interact with the so-called daft content

19.01.2025 11:44 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Check meghanpedia website. They have the archive there

13.01.2025 00:46 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I know you slowly killing your soul by this hatred. Pity you, really

12.01.2025 01:38 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Save the date and repost!
#SussexSquad
#WeLoveYouMeghan

06.01.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 100    πŸ” 57    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 4

Nooo. I was hoping of at least an hour per episode show 😭

03.01.2025 05:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

1 million milestone reached! Onwards! Felicidades mi reina! #MeghanMarkle

02.01.2025 21:56 β€” πŸ‘ 40    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

@archelove is following 18 prominent accounts