๐ฎ
21.11.2025 02:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@rudydb.bsky.social
๐ฎ
21.11.2025 02:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Where is Wikileaks when you really need them?
18.11.2025 16:44 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@ethanjskolnick.bsky.social
Bam going to NYC cause Aโja is there.
Good morning America appearance this morning.
No bam, no herro
08.11.2025 01:48 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Thatโs so great man
Ethan doing amazing things with his network and so happy for him and his crew.
But when you two go at it. Itโs fantastic banter.
Ball night!!!!
Whatโs up B, when you coming on at 5 on the floor again.
You and @ethanjskolnick.bsky.social have the best banters
Execution and implementation will be very important
Letโs hope some policies stick and have a positive impact
Trump +11 ๐ซ
14.10.2025 14:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I just never heard of her before to even know.
I wasnโt about to rewatch old watts footage
CBS editorial is the real concern
NN: Dems say you won't swear in Grijalva bc you don't want her vote on Epstein
JOHNSON: No. It's scheduling
NN: But there have been Rs sworn in during pro forma sessions
MJ: Only reason was bc they flew in their family
NN: So if she flies in her family you'd do it?
MJ: Again, it's a distraction
Katie Porter would be a great governor for CA.
@cbsnews.com is a different place now with agenda.
I donโt know anything about Julie Watts politics, she could be a good journalist able to maintain impartiality.
But the change in editorial control and ownership at CBS makes me trust them less
Hey Tom,
ICE taking a steak in polymktโฆ..
Which ICE? I need clarification ๐คฃ
+ Xi
06.10.2025 23:51 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Great share!
06.10.2025 23:11 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Exciting developments in solar.
Just read this fascinating FT article on perovskite solar panels โ the next-gen innovation that's lighter, more flexible, and up to 20% more efficient than traditional silicon ones.
Imagine panels turning everyday surfaces into power generators
The proper follow up now is:
Mr president now that youโve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. What would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
No lies detected
06.10.2025 22:39 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The proper follow up now is:
Mr president now that youโve acknowledged that would consider the pardon of a convicted sex offender. Whatโs would you tell the victims of her crimes to justify the pardon?
Ask every day, ask the press secretary. Ask Wiles, Miller, Rubio and Basset.
@cnn.com ought to stop giving live air time to Trump administration officials.
Have them on in taped segments so they arenโt able to filibuster the question and air talking points and faux grievances.
It would also allow their correspondents to ask more topical follow up questions.
Since 1984
06.10.2025 01:00 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Peggy knew his boss was a snake ๐ when she endorsed the candidate.
She was clutching her pearls about VP Harris, calling her a โbitchโ in those same WSJ pages.
This is what you voted for. This is what the WSJ endorsed.
Peggy sucks. Sheโs been setting women back since she worked for Ronald Regan.
In this day and age of holocaust denialism and historical forgetfulness it worries me that most donโt see the truth in this statement by Bill.
This is absolutely true.
I agree, it is very lazy politics.
I also agree that the candidate that rallies more voters usually winsโฆand I too believe policy is the best way to do that.
I just want to win again, it will be easer to win if we play into the bullshit you correctly described.
Iโm with w/candidate we field
Yet, almost all them who still identify as ๐ would vote for him again or continue to support another GOP candidate in an upcoming election.
Itโs not the economy that drives them. Itโs the misogyny and racism.
Itโs the unwillingness to say โI made a mistakeโ
Any state official who receives a call from a Trump administration official needs to record the conversation and release to the media immediately.
Sun light and transparency!
Let them know they are being recorded. Let them know itโs going to get released.
So it wasnโt 1%?
What about the electoral college total? Would a โwinnableโ PA have made a difference if it went 1.71% the other way?
But I do fully agree that trump exaggerates things, often for propaganda effect
And I do agree that republicans are held accountable more by their constituents.
Tell Susie Wiles ASAP!
She can talk Cheeto and tell him what do to.
If we are going to blur the lines of executive meddling in the DOJ, then I want this as a consolation grift
Make it a federal case Kash!
Paging Susie Wiles
Girl this is your chance!
Tell your ๐ boy what to do!
Wasnโt it 1.8 %?
I think the electoral college result was 312 to 226?
If it was then PAโs 19 wouldnโt matter anyhow.
Iโm sure sheโd fare better now amid all the chaos, I think she was very qualified.
But I also think the next D nominee will be a white man. but who knows ๐คทโโ๏ธ๐คทโโ๏ธ๐คท๐พโโ๏ธ