Tim Knittel • Bourbon Educator & Events

Turning off Memories has made a substantial improvement for me.

If a student submitted that to me as their reasoning and answer, I would believe they were thinking. I see nothing here which convinces me the models are using language to world-model and create outputs in any meaningfully way different than I do.

I do not believe that to be correct based upon what I have ready about how they work (mostly via TheZvi) and my own personal experience using them, but I'm open to changing my mind if you can provide evidence to support your claim.

I think you have not used current-gen AI with chain-of-thought reasoning models.

That analogy would mean the AI is doing creative writing, not lying.

This is where the confusion comes in regularly regarding AI. It is not programmed. AI is not 'designed' in the way you are using that word. Describing specific errors as "lying" is easy but wrong, which is why people who understand this better than you do write about it differently than you.

But the US is actually 4% of the world population, although middle- and upper-income white people are 15% of the US population …. oh.

If I’m understanding this correctly, privatizing Social Security would change it from group risk to individual risk, is that correct?

Making this a candlestick chart would make it even more obvious.

Now do the chart showing changes against disposable income.

Perhaps it’s because they don’t know they’re broligarchs - they think they’re average bros, just special.

What is stopping them from just requesting a 24 hour extension every 24 hours? It seems like the judges are extremely handicapped by this specific need to appear existentially unbiased.

I don’t want journalists to tell me two people are arguing about whether it’s raining and report on both sides in an equal and unbiased way. I want them to look out the damn window and tell me what’s actually happening and who is lying about it.

Thank you for putting succinctly what I have been trying to conceptualize.

I take credit for that cocktail. Dirty martini, quite good. Photo credit to Hilary.

Best explanation: bsky.app/profile/carl...

Okay, thank you. Previous comments were much lower indirect rates. This makes more sense.

I was just using that figure because it's a round number, not as a specific measure of a grant. I could have easily used 1MM or 10MM to achieve the same percentages.

Please help me understand that math. If $100k base-line grant previously had a +50% indirect costs, that's $150k total. Now it's $115k total, which is a ~23% reduction. (I did the math wrong the first time to come to 18%)

So if I'm understanding this correctly, this type of federal government-funded research just individually all took ~18% hit?

Can someone help me understand the implications of this, please?

I live in Kentucky. Only 30% of the population here voted for Trump. The 70% of our populationwho did not vote for him is also going to suffer.

TTB Proposes Mandatory Disclosures of Major Food Allergens content.govdelivery.com/accounts/UST...

In the US, beverage alcohol is the last human consumable without allergen warnings or nutrition facts (or ingredient listings). Hopefully this is progress toward changing that. #bourbon #distilled

It could actually happen. We’ll just have to see. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Fortunately it won’t impact the event we’ll be having in February.

I can see the intent behind that law, it wow can I see implementation problems. Not sure as a person I would want a clerk to open my just-purchased bottle? 🤷🏻‍♂️

That’s the line for the KY Bourbon Festival Early Friday

Maybe a Madeira-soaked cherry for the garnish?

Malt Scotch, either blended or single, preferably initially matured in an ex-Jack Daniel’s barrels (not a Jim Beam barrel). Still thinking about the garnish.

Yep, us too until we got our awesome two-oven setup.