Iβm really proud of my friend Nick Dockery for starting this great foundation for an important cause. Check it out! www.dockeryfoundation.org/home
29.10.2025 12:45 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@mzmargulies.bsky.social
Civ mil relations. MUFC. "Aggressively non-pretentious" musical taste.
Iβm really proud of my friend Nick Dockery for starting this great foundation for an important cause. Check it out! www.dockeryfoundation.org/home
29.10.2025 12:45 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So, sending troops to Chicago or Baltimore would be much more complicated than either LA or DC.
π§΅
Just had a great afternoon at @casanctuary.org hanging out with some beautiful animals. Kids had a blast and staff were so kind and professional. Anyone taking a trip near the Catskills should check them out!
05.07.2025 19:32 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0No worries! Probably because Iβm not great at promoting myself π
23.06.2025 19:34 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Lastly, I think it has a pretty good summary of the competing arguments and findings, including both the public opinion/experimental approaches and the cross-national time-series analyses
23.06.2025 15:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I find that conscription is not associated with restraint, and that cross nationally it is more likely to increase the probability of conflict initiation. Unlike previous studies, I also account for the size of the military relative to the population
23.06.2025 15:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Everything Lindsay said! Happy to share my recent @jpeaceresearch.bsky.social article with anyone who wants to learn more about the relationship between military recruitment practices and conflict initiation. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
23.06.2025 15:25 β π 6 π 4 π¬ 1 π 1Can someone please explain to me how spending time on this review contributes to βlethalityβ?
04.06.2025 00:12 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Pleased to announce that my article with Andrew Webster on what the army needs to think about to do a better job of recruiting is out at Military Review www.armyupress.army.mil/journals/mil...
14.04.2025 19:53 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0TLDR: βwe have no idea what good is supposed to come of these tariffs, but donβt panic bc eventually the administration will explain itβ π
09.04.2025 13:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Hereβs what is going on. When you start firing the militaryβs top lawyers, that means you are getting ready to order the military to do unlawful things. Trump replaces those JAGs with men who will justify any future unlawful and unethical actions that he wants the military to do.
22.02.2025 02:34 β π 2417 π 1097 π¬ 87 π 116We do not want every incoming administration to clear house at the Pentagon. Our armed forces should not be led by politically-motivated individuals.
Trumpβs actions threaten to forever damage our national defense.
I'm preaching to the choir here on bluesky, but telework isn't important to me because I don't want to do my job. It's important to me because a significant portion of my work is done solo and requires focus and time to think. That is nearly impossible in shared offices with constant interruptions.
29.01.2025 01:03 β π 90 π 8 π¬ 4 π 7Oh yeah, I think especially some of the earlier books. For some reason abaddonβs gate is jumping out at me (dynamics on the OPA ship) but thereβs also good links with Duarteβs whole rΓ©gime toward the end
24.01.2025 18:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0What I mean here is that *regardless* of whether targeting civilians to undermine morale can be an effective strategy, itβs morally repugnant, contrary to IHL, and should be condemned whenever it happens.
16.11.2024 15:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks, Chris. Itβs hard to cover all your bases here and be adequately nuanced. I may have misinterpreted your engagement as trying to poke holes rather than building or clarifying.
16.11.2024 15:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0My comment was meant to protect me against the accusation that I think its okay to target civilians. Instead it sounds like you think I dont think these questions matter, even though I clearly said otherwise. Here I thought I was ready to be more active hereβ¦there really is no winning on SMβ¦
16.11.2024 13:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Of course. When I said moot, I meant from a perspective of US policy. Clearly I still think the questions have value
16.11.2024 12:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0All moot, imo anyway, for modern policy discussion since most of what we are talking about is clearly impermissible under the principle of distinction
16.11.2024 12:49 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1Still I think raises some questions: is civilian morale what influences leaders? How long does it take to significantly affect civilian morale? And can we distinguish between the effect of instilling terror on the population from the effect of destroying war making capacity and economic opportunity
16.11.2024 12:48 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 1Im no historian, but ive always been pretty persuaded by the argument that the soviet invasion was the decisive factor (though surely the bombings were ssignificant).
16.11.2024 12:48 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Im hard pressed to think of an example where it hasnβt unified or hardened resolve, at least in the short term! Even if it eventually undermines morale enough to end war, thereβs still the question of whether the population is more likely to blame their own government
16.11.2024 02:06 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0War & Morality online symposium this week hosted by WWI Museum.
Amazing list of presenters, including: Hew Strachan, @risabrooks12.bsky.social @queenofthinair.bsky.social @nathankfinney.com @mzmargulies.bsky.social @heatheratacts.bsky.social, Jonathan Bratten, & more.
www.theworldwar.org/symposia
Hi everybody, Iβm giving a large public lecture on Democracy & the Military at the University of Rhode Island on Tuesday at 7 p.m. EST. Link to watch online available on the day & free to attend for anyone local web.uri.edu/hc/2024-hono...
20.10.2024 21:38 β π 24 π 8 π¬ 1 π 2Me too, kid. Me too
21.10.2024 14:05 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I am honored to meet your standards of swift-iness and bummed that I wonβt see you there π©
14.08.2024 16:39 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks Jess! May take me a while to figure this outβ¦
10.08.2024 00:21 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0