It's nice to see more academic journals cover the importance of scientists meeting people where they are (social media) in order to share evidence-based information.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
@wytang.bsky.social
Erasmus Rotterdam University - Lecturer - Communications Ph.D. academic precariat - Media Psychology - Videogames & Sexism
It's nice to see more academic journals cover the importance of scientists meeting people where they are (social media) in order to share evidence-based information.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
๐ฃ New preprint!
We brought together experts from academia, major video game studios, NGOs, funding bodies, and civil society groups to ask: what should be prioritised when it comes to the future of video games? ๐งต
Just 85 experts ๐, it should've been double that number
17.02.2026 14:51 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0One of my current projects is a book that will likely interest of perhaps four or five people (give or take) is a monograph on the history of research on the weapons effect. I start out with a discussion of the conditions (social & research) in the mid-1960s that led to Berkowitz & Lepage (1967). /1
17.02.2026 07:44 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Loyalty to favoured groups trumps the effects of causal structure in making causal judgments on issues of politics.
When identities are not provided, causal structure matters; when they are known, they are almost all that matters.
Here is the link to our study onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
The Matrix of Coordinated Influence. Traditional frameworks for analyzing online influence focus on the distinction between human and automated actors (Identity Axis) or between spontaneous and coordinated behavior (Articulation Axis). Bot Nets (top-left) rely on synthetic identities and automated scripts. Troll Farms (bottom-left) use human operators to manage fake personas. Grassroots Action (bottom-right) involves verified citizens sharing self-authored views. Cyborg Propaganda (top-right) represents a new paradigm: verified human users disseminating centrally generated, algorithmically generated narratives, effectively โhybridizingโ the authenticity of the grassroots with the scale of the botnet.
The distinction between grassroots activism and automated influence is collapsing.
We typically worry about "bot farms" or "troll factories." But a distinct, more complex threat is emerging. We call it "Cyborg Propaganda."
Sharing this one last time before the survey closes at the end of February. If you had an NSFW game posted to Steam or itch.io in July, consider participating in our survey.
15.02.2026 17:17 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Babbage, 1830, discussing the problem that scientists selectively report findings that they want to be true.
Confirmation bias is a strong human tendency. This is why we need to design science in a way that prevents conformation bias from leading us away from the truth.
I ran into the same problem described in @malte.the100.ci et al's paper of meta-science authors hiding which papers they've studied.
This anonymization practice is antithetical to scientific norms and the entire purpose of meta-science.
Old blog post about it:
and loot boxes are 'surprise mechanics' via @jamiemadigan.bsky.social
www.forbes.com/sites/jamiem...
Also lots of assumptions about this "no social media" world. For one, it's not going to be in a WEIRD country.
12.02.2026 09:25 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Perhaps we can take gander in history in regards to the introduction of the television
12.02.2026 09:20 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Not an expert on social media & youth studies, but here's a question for those who are: all the evidence that shows detrimental effects of not using it, come from a context where everybody is using it and just a few are not. How much can that be extrapolated to a world where nobody is? #CommSky
12.02.2026 08:53 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Depressed? Anxious? Lonely?
What if mental health doesnโt just result from media use, but shapes how we choose media?
In a new preprint, Valerie Klein, @gongxuanjun.bsky.social @aeden.bsky.social and I and I test this using a computational decision-making model: doi.org/10.21203/rs....
๐งตThread
It must be very hard to publish null results Publication practices in the social sciences act as a filter that favors statistically significant results over null findings. While the problem of selection on significance (SoS) is well-known in theory, it has been difficult to measure its scope empirically, and it has been challenging to determine how selection varies across contexts. In this article, we use large language models to extract granular and validated data on about 100,000 articles published in over 150 political science journals from 2010 to 2024. We show that fewer than 2% of articles that rely on statistical methods report null-only findings in their abstracts, while over 90% of papers highlight significant results. To put these findings in perspective, we develop and calibrate a simple model of publication bias. Across a range of plausible assumptions, we find that statistically significant results are estimated to be one to two orders of magnitude more likely to enter the published record than null results. Leveraging metadata extracted from individual articles, we show that the pattern of strong SoS holds across subfields, journals, methods, and time periods. However, a few factors such as pre-registration and randomized experiments correlate with greater acceptance of null results. We conclude by discussing implications for the field and the potential of our new dataset for investigating other questions about political science.
I have a new paper. We look at ~all stats articles in political science post-2010 & show that 94% have abstracts that claim to reject a null. Only 2% present only null results. This is hard to explain unless the research process has a filter that only lets rejections through.
11.02.2026 17:00 โ ๐ 635 ๐ 222 ๐ฌ 30 ๐ 51OpenAI fired a VP who opposed their erotica rollout (and had started a company-wide peer mentorship program for women), allegedly telling her it was because she discriminated against a man ๐ค www.wsj.com/tech/ai/open...
11.02.2026 12:03 โ ๐ 776 ๐ 291 ๐ฌ 14 ๐ 45Graphic titled Safer Internet Day. A dark blue background with the date February 10th 2026. Graphic features some text that says: The internet is not just a technological space โ it is a psychological one too. Creating a safer internet goes beyond cybersecurity measures alone. It requires an understanding of human behaviour, social interaction, identity, power, and vulnerability in digital contexts.
Today is Safer Internet Day ๐
The internet is not just a technological space - it is a psychological one. The BPS Cyberpsychology Committee is committed to advancing research, practice, and policy that promote safer, more inclusive, and psychologically healthy online spaces.
#SaferInternetDay
(Un)Silencing Academia in Times of Epistemic Conflicts:
Navigating Online Violence by
@albertagiorgi.bsky.social & @haeszi.bsky.social
doi.org/10.4324/9781...
cc @veletsianos.bsky.social
1/ ProPublica collected handwritten letters in mid-January from children held at the Dilley Immigration Processing Center, the same facility where 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos was taken.
Hundreds of kids are still detained.
Weโll let the childrenโs words speak for themselves. ๐งต
SCIENCE IS UNDER CENSORSHIP. โWOMENโ โVACCINEโ โEQUITYโ โADDICTIONโ FROM PEN AMERICAโS LIST OF WORDS BANNED FROM FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WORK.
Science cannot thrive when censorship shuts down research. Shutting down research doesn't make people healthy. Help us impeach & #RemoveRFKJr by visiting standupforscience.net/impeach-rfkjr .
(1/5๐งต)
The screen time panic sets parents up to fail by @404media.co @patrickklepek.bsky.social
youtu.be/p2DEjvIvfs0?...
Very much of Cory Doctorow's reverse centaur www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i...
09.02.2026 17:48 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Sounds very much of Cory Doctorow's reverse centaur www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i...
09.02.2026 17:47 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0My colleague Krist Vaessen wrote a new book: โNeomania: How our obsession with innovation is failing science, and how to restore trustโ. It's a great analysis how the drive for novelty hinders reliable scientific progress. Open Access, so read it here: books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp...
09.02.2026 15:42 โ ๐ 13 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Defining prosociality: systematic review on prosocial, altruistic, helping and proactive behaviors incorporating artificial intelligence by Benjamin Binder, Michael Eid & Timo Lorenz
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
I made a map of 3.4 million Bluesky users - see if you can find yourself!
bluesky-map.theo.io
I've seen some similar projects, but IMO this seems to better capture some of the fine-grained detail
I have yet to see any evidence that there is a market for AI-generated books outside of people being tricked into thinking they are not AI-generated books. AKA, it is a project of scamming and deceiving people, and really should be treated as fraud
08.02.2026 18:55 โ ๐ 5809 ๐ 1510 ๐ฌ 72 ๐ 48Sociologist @nbedera.bsky.social
explains how observing ICE is a 'de-escalation' tactic