A good systematic review/meta analysis will evaluate the quality of each study and not just review the conclusions/data.

If the methodology doesn't include evaluation of quality, it's not a good source. Reviewing methodology is part of the vetting process.

Job opportunities at Retraction Watch Here are our current open positions: Editor, Medical Evidence Project Staff reporter, Retraction Watch Assistant researcher, Retraction Watch Database Learn more about the Center for Scientific Int…

The Center For Scientific Integrity, our parent nonprofit, is hiring! Two new positions:

-- Editor, Medical Evidence Project
-- Staff reporter, Retraction Watch

and we're still recruiting for:

-- Assistant researcher, Retraction Watch Database

#ai #llm #integrity #reliability #transparency

As the wave of LLM generated research swells, how can you tell whether it is legit? Introducing the high five: a checklist for the evaluation of knowledge claims by LLMs, other generative AI, and science in general

Do business and economics studies erode prosocial values? Does exposure to business and economics education make students less prosocial and more selfish? Employing a difference-in-difference strategy with panel-data from three subsequent cohorts of student...

Very important evidence from Sweden showing that #business and #economics become less #prosocial during their studies, while #law students do not onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

Yes!

We are looking for RAs to work with us on a new meta-science & replication project, joint with @i4replication.bsky.social, now with focus on environmental (economics) topics such as air pollution & carbon pricing. RAs can work remotely but must be located in Germany www.rwi-essen.de/fileadmin/us...

@ap.brid.gy @renebekkers.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy

@ap.brid.gy @renebekkers@mastodon.social

@ap.brid.gy