Charles Desneuf

Thanks a lot for the clarification. That’s an interesting thread.

I could agree with that :)

Using automated refactoring tools is one of the key missing skills of most devs.

kieranhealy.org/blog/archive...

.... "Vous allez crever parce que quelqu'un d'autre a dit quelque chose sur Internet"

Dimanche 27 juillet, Lisa et Lyes assistent au Tour de France à Paris et accrochent un drapeau de la Palestine.

Résultat : 22 heures de garde à vue, une condamnation et des poursuites pour "violence sur un fonctionnaire de la police nationale sans incapacité et rébellion".

Unpopular opinion: Using a variable named sut for the system under test is a bad idea; it makes tests less readable. Sure, it helps with finding the act part of the test but, IMO, needing that is a sign that you need to invest in your arrange and assert parts to improve the overall test readability.

Stupid
Ugly
Test

Unpopular opinion: Using a variable named sut for the system under test is a bad idea; it makes tests less readable. Sure, it helps with finding the act part of the test but, IMO, needing that is a sign that you need to invest in your arrange and assert parts to improve the overall test readability.

In your tests, most of the time, the setup/beforeEach should be used only for instantiating services. You want values to appear right in the test because they are helpful for telling the story.

Testing Rule of Thumb: if some pieces of data are in the assert they must appear in the arrange or act phase first.

Using a builder to create your mocks is a clear signal that you are doing something wrong and should start looking for an alternative solution.

(And that solution is probably an abstraction using domain language)

Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

Never tried HTMX but it’s clearly in my good SPA alternatives. I’m not sure we can, and will be able, to go without JS. It removes a lot of the needed complexity for SPAs.

Yes, probably.
But I seriously think that most of the SPAs would better be MPAs, even now, even without these enhancements.

Post X de BFMTV avec ce texte : Parade nautique, grand concert...Le programme du premier anniversaire des Jeux olympiques de Paris

Attendez on remet de l’argent pour fêter l’anniversaire d’un événement qui a déjà explosé les conteurs en termes de budget ?
On est des génies

It's time for modern CSS to kill the SPA Native CSS transitions have quietly killed the strongest argument for client-side routing. Yet people keep building terrible apps instead of performant websites.

Is it finally the time to kill the monstrousities that SPA are and the cost in accidental complexity they come with?

www.jonoalderson.com/conjecture/i...

You'll find the proper definition of the principle, formulated by Andy Hunt and Dave Thomas, in their book "The Pragmatic Programmer" as quoted here:

"Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system."

2/2

DRY is often confused as "don't repeat code," which was never the intended meaning.

DRY is about knowledge. Don't repeat knowledge.

You can repeat identical lines of code that don't repeat or leak knowledge.

1/2

Fabien était un modèle pour plusieurs personnes. Je me demande souvent « Que ferait Fabien M. ? » quand il y a de l’humain et de l’éthique.

Un de mes souvenirs de Fabien est la fois où il s’est pointé en kata pour nous faire générer des chansons de Justine avec une chaîne de Markov.

Salut copain.

Using a builder to create your mocks is a clear signal that you are doing something wrong and should start looking for an alternative solution.

(And that solution is probably an abstraction using domain language)

Tu sais tout faire 🫶

😂

Woman in line in front of me at the post office is not happy about the cost of shipping. She just whipped out her phone, asked ChatGPT how much it thinks the shipping should cost, and is trying to get the mailman to honor that price.

Vous avez vu, l’Espagne va baisser la TVA sur les produits essentiels. Vous savez pourquoi on ne le fait pas en France ? La réponse courte, c’est Macron, comme souvent. Mais le détail du pourquoi est hyper intéressant. Explications :

Postgres is probably more than good enough for most of us 😅

Could decrease the number of queries by one (only decrease vs read inventory + update inventory) but that’s probably not a massive boost.

Yep, that’s what I understood later. > 0 could work (actually > requestedItemCount) but it would be similar to select for update so won’t make a change.

Testing Rule of Thumb: If it looks too much like the real implementation, doubt it

🧵 1/9

Could’ve been a single PHP script?