did you know that the english equivalent of the name ‘cazador szarr’ is ‘hunter biden’
23.11.2025 05:22 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@makeitsnow.bsky.social
bluesky’s most popular sports account
did you know that the english equivalent of the name ‘cazador szarr’ is ‘hunter biden’
23.11.2025 05:22 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i’ve read most of your posts today and i would absolutely not call it a misrepresentation
23.11.2025 05:21 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0do you think maybe ‘always’ includes jefferson’s time, bud?
23.11.2025 05:05 — 👍 14 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0maybe you should take a little break, you’re losing track of your argument. you’ve been telling me all day that we can’t condemn child rape by the standards of 1776, so how can you use them to condemn trump for child rape?
23.11.2025 05:04 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0you did, in the very post she’s replying to
23.11.2025 04:03 — 👍 21 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0then
by
what
standard
do
you
condemn
trump
but
not
jefferson
can you condemn a rapist living in india today? i can
23.11.2025 03:10 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i can’t condemn someone because we can’t get everyone to condemn someone else? utterly irrational
23.11.2025 03:08 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0he’s not going to answer because he knows he’s backed himself into a corner trying to find some sequence of words that will win him the argument
23.11.2025 03:06 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0why reply at all if it’s only going to be with a restatement of a position i’ve already taken apart?
23.11.2025 03:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0not now, rural indexing project
23.11.2025 01:33 — 👍 29 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0‘obviously yes’ is a complete answer. the harm jefferson did to that little girl was the same harm then that it would be today
23.11.2025 01:28 — 👍 12 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0i mean i love doing it but no
23.11.2025 01:09 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i’m an attorney and i’d like to know what ‘on behalf of charges filed by the victim’ means
23.11.2025 01:06 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0disagree with what? whether raping children is wrong has never been a subjective question
23.11.2025 01:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0literally everything we condemn americans for today involves not living up to a standard 100% of americans can’t agree on today. you’re making a fool of yourself
23.11.2025 01:03 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0also, if (as you keep saying for some reason) 2025’s standard is not much better, can you condemn donald trump by it? why or why not?
23.11.2025 00:54 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0do you think the slaves were living in 2025
23.11.2025 00:48 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i think i see one
23.11.2025 00:45 — 👍 11 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i’m asking what’s true. have you harmed the child?
23.11.2025 00:44 — 👍 9 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0got any thoughts on the morality of that
23.11.2025 00:42 — 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0jesus christ lol
23.11.2025 00:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0yes: the morality of rape was 0% subjective, as it is today
23.11.2025 00:38 — 👍 8 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0this is not correct. no one in the field of political science would say this is correct
23.11.2025 00:36 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0let’s try it this way: you use a time machine to travel to 1776 and force yourself on a child. have you harmed the child? or only his or her owner?
23.11.2025 00:33 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0this response does not suggest to me that you read the question
23.11.2025 00:28 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i’m not sure that anyone’s asked you this, but i did ask you when the first rape was. you don’t have to name a specific victim and it’s fine if you want to give me a decade or even a century
23.11.2025 00:23 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0your posts are very good evidence that you’re white
23.11.2025 00:18 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i know you don’t understand the victims to be moral agents or even people generally, but they had their own very strong opinions as to the morality of what was being done to them
23.11.2025 00:17 — 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0yes, i’m sure. and you’re clearly not smart enough to have understood the point here, so i’ll lay it out: you’re evaluating the morality of the day exclusively from the perspective of the raping, slaving class
23.11.2025 00:14 — 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0