Laura Vague's Avatar

Laura Vague

@lavague.bsky.social

She/Her

131 Followers  |  91 Following  |  26 Posts  |  Joined: 11.01.2025  |  2.1441

Latest posts by lavague.bsky.social on Bluesky


The best!! ๐Ÿ˜

20.06.2025 19:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

But her necklace.

13.05.2025 18:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2918    ๐Ÿ” 591    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 62    ๐Ÿ“Œ 15

Iโ€™m a professional pet sitter - normally this is a super-busy time for me and Iโ€™ve got zero work for 3 weeksโ€ฆnone of my people are traveling ๐Ÿ˜พ

06.05.2025 23:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 11    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

THE PENTAGON BUDGET JUST HIT A TRILLION DOLLARS.

Not a single pundit from either political party said โ€œhow are we going to pay for it?!โ€

Donโ€™t dare tell us we cannot ALL have healthcare, housing, and education.

06.05.2025 00:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 25230    ๐Ÿ” 7081    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 653    ๐Ÿ“Œ 295
The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders โ€” especially by
officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it. To permit such officials to
freely "annul the judgments of the courts of the United States" would not just "destroy the rights acquired under those judgments"; it would make "a solemn mockery" of "the constitution itself." United States v. Peters, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 115, 136 (1809) (Marshall, C.J.). "So fatal a result must be deprecated by all." Id.

The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders โ€” especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it. To permit such officials to freely "annul the judgments of the courts of the United States" would not just "destroy the rights acquired under those judgments"; it would make "a solemn mockery" of "the constitution itself." United States v. Peters, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 115, 136 (1809) (Marshall, C.J.). "So fatal a result must be deprecated by all." Id.

NEW: Judge Boasberg finds probable cause for contempt against the Trump administration: "The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders โ€” especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it." storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

16.04.2025 16:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3206    ๐Ÿ” 761    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 25    ๐Ÿ“Œ 73
One might nonetheless ask how this inquiry into compliance is able to proceed at all
given that the Supreme Court vacated the TRO after the events in question. That Courtโ€™s later
determination that the TRO suffered from a legal defect, however, does not excuse the
Governmentโ€™s violation. Instead, it is a foundational legal precept that every judicial order โ€œmust
be obeyedโ€ โ€” no matter how โ€œerroneousโ€ it โ€œmay beโ€ โ€” until a court reverses it. Walker v. City
of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307, 314 (1967). If a party chooses to disobey the order โ€” rather than
wait for it to be reversed through the judicial process โ€” such disobedience is punishable as
contempt, notwithstanding any later-revealed deficiencies in the order. See id. at 314, 320. That
foundational โ€œrule of lawโ€ answers not just how this compliance inquiry can proceed, but why it
must. See id. at 320. The rule โ€œreflects a belief that in the fair administration of justice no man
can be judge in his own case,โ€ no matter how โ€œexalted his stationโ€ or โ€œrighteous his motives.โ€
Id. at 320โ€“21.
The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders โ€” especially by
officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it. To permit such officials to
freely โ€œannul the judgments of the courts of the United Statesโ€ would not just โ€œdestroy the rights
acquired under those judgmentsโ€; it would make โ€œa solemn mockeryโ€ of โ€œthe constitution itself.โ€
United States v. Peters, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 115, 136 (1809) (Marshall, C.J.). โ€œSo fatal a result
must be deprecated by all.โ€ Id.

One might nonetheless ask how this inquiry into compliance is able to proceed at all given that the Supreme Court vacated the TRO after the events in question. That Courtโ€™s later determination that the TRO suffered from a legal defect, however, does not excuse the Governmentโ€™s violation. Instead, it is a foundational legal precept that every judicial order โ€œmust be obeyedโ€ โ€” no matter how โ€œerroneousโ€ it โ€œmay beโ€ โ€” until a court reverses it. Walker v. City of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307, 314 (1967). If a party chooses to disobey the order โ€” rather than wait for it to be reversed through the judicial process โ€” such disobedience is punishable as contempt, notwithstanding any later-revealed deficiencies in the order. See id. at 314, 320. That foundational โ€œrule of lawโ€ answers not just how this compliance inquiry can proceed, but why it must. See id. at 320. The rule โ€œreflects a belief that in the fair administration of justice no man can be judge in his own case,โ€ no matter how โ€œexalted his stationโ€ or โ€œrighteous his motives.โ€ Id. at 320โ€“21. The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders โ€” especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it. To permit such officials to freely โ€œannul the judgments of the courts of the United Statesโ€ would not just โ€œdestroy the rights acquired under those judgmentsโ€; it would make โ€œa solemn mockeryโ€ of โ€œthe constitution itself.โ€ United States v. Peters, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 115, 136 (1809) (Marshall, C.J.). โ€œSo fatal a result must be deprecated by all.โ€ Id.

Judge Boasberg writes: "The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial ordersโ€”especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it."

Anything less would make โ€œa solemn mockeryโ€ of โ€œthe constitution itself.โ€ storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

16.04.2025 16:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1792    ๐Ÿ” 402    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 25    ๐Ÿ“Œ 16

Whaaaat is that headline..? ๐Ÿ™‡๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ™‡๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ™‡๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ

16.04.2025 16:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Good! This was fucking insane ๐Ÿ˜ก

05.04.2025 15:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Fucker.

04.04.2025 21:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"We donโ€™t want your Nazi cars / take a one-way trip to Mars" is a pretty good chant

30.03.2025 00:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 11106    ๐Ÿ” 2273    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 169    ๐Ÿ“Œ 127
Post image

Hereโ€™s what I do about thatโ€ฆ

29.03.2025 18:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Dug out my old flip flops from his first termโ€ฆwhoโ€™d a thot Iโ€™d get to use em again?! ๐Ÿคจ

20.03.2025 02:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yep

06.03.2025 17:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
06.03.2025 00:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
04.03.2025 22:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

04.03.2025 17:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah, wrong country there, Sport ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ

04.03.2025 17:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ladies and Gents, your Secretary of Stateโ€ฆ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ
Fucking putz.

03.03.2025 22:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

02.03.2025 17:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

๐Ÿ˜€

02.03.2025 00:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ha!

02.03.2025 00:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

๐ŸŸ

02.03.2025 00:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
David Johansen, Who Fronted the New York Dolls and More, Dies at 75 In the 1970s, he and the transgressive Dolls were proto-punk pioneers. He later refashioned himself as the pompadoured lounge lizard Buster Poindexter.

Breaking News: David Johansen, who as frontman of the New York Dolls was in the vanguard of glam and punk rock, has died at 75.

01.03.2025 16:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 571    ๐Ÿ” 137    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 27    ๐Ÿ“Œ 68
Preview
Norwegian fuel supplier refuses U.S. warships over Ukraine Haltbakk Bunkers will cease supplying fuel to U.S. forces in Norway and American ships docking in Norwegian ports, citing dissatisfaction with recent U.S. policy towards Ukraine.

A major Norwegian fuel company is refusing to provide fuel to U.S. warships after the โ€œshitshowโ€ in the White House yesterday over Ukraine. This is the way. ukdefencejournal.org.uk/norwegian-fu...

01.03.2025 21:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 27533    ๐Ÿ” 4500    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 820    ๐Ÿ“Œ 409
Post image

The cowardice of the GOP has been astounding ๐Ÿ‘‡

#TraitorTrump

01.03.2025 12:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 38389    ๐Ÿ” 10891    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1475    ๐Ÿ“Œ 655

Michelle Obama: Kids should have nutritious meals.

The pro-life party: This is an outrage!

RFK Jr: Kids should have measles, mumps, and polio.

The pro-life party: Yes, king! Tell it like it is!

01.03.2025 14:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 24893    ๐Ÿ” 4687    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 211    ๐Ÿ“Œ 126
Tweet: "Have you said thank you once?" -@VP JD Vance - pic of jd Vance looking oddly symmetrical.  Why are his pants so tight?

Tweet: "Have you said thank you once?" -@VP JD Vance - pic of jd Vance looking oddly symmetrical. Why are his pants so tight?

I can't stop laughing at this man I'm sorry. This is the kind of shit the biggest loser in the world would say to their girlfriend about buying her flowers on Valentine's Day once, and he's doing so in an argument that started because he called her a bitch

01.03.2025 14:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 22642    ๐Ÿ” 3595    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 853    ๐Ÿ“Œ 298

Omg ๐Ÿ˜‚

24.02.2025 22:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

El Capitan displays a massive American flag upside downโ€”the traditional signal of distress or extreme emergency.

23.02.2025 18:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 95847    ๐Ÿ” 20906    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1003    ๐Ÿ“Œ 935

@lavague is following 20 prominent accounts