Ruben Diaz's Avatar

Ruben Diaz

@electrons.bsky.social

Stage-fraught guitar player and physicist, working as an electron whisperer.

130 Followers  |  187 Following  |  19 Posts  |  Joined: 25.09.2023  |  1.908

Latest posts by electrons.bsky.social on Bluesky


Post image

in case you're curious about how angry Minnesota is about ICE, it was -20 today

24.01.2026 00:38 β€” πŸ‘ 50097    πŸ” 14428    πŸ’¬ 970    πŸ“Œ 854

Where are you now Herve?

17.08.2025 22:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Is it wrong that I even get excited by n=0?

31.07.2025 20:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I remember that paper well… being fascinated by how much information was buried in images that looked like pure noise.

12.07.2025 17:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You are not seeing the big picture Ed. Suppose that you are planning to do research that requires 1 month of MRI usage... yes, you can add that to your grant proposal, but if nobody uses the MRI, it will have to be closed, because the income for 1 month cannot keep it open. IDC is the only way.

21.05.2025 19:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Because what else is going to fund it? At a University, it would be unfair to use tuition dollars to fund maintenance of research facilities, or the utility bills for it, for example. At a non-profit, there is no other source of income to fund the research effort.

19.05.2025 18:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The idc pays for things that are not directly contemplated in the grant. It pays for the janitorial services, building rent, service contracts for instruments, etc. It is definitely not a ripoff.

18.05.2025 21:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Looks very tempting!!

09.04.2025 06:17 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Am I the only one conviced that we are living inside a Batman movie where the Joker got elected President? (but Batman is MIA)

12.02.2025 07:07 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Of course it’s a coup Miss the obvious, lose your republic

Of course it’s a coup. Miss the obvious, lose your republic.
open.substack.com/pub/snyder/p...

05.02.2025 14:59 β€” πŸ‘ 28270    πŸ” 10788    πŸ’¬ 588    πŸ“Œ 757
Post image Post image

Thanks to George Conway for posting Caroline Kennedy's letter so everyone is informed about RFK Jr. Please repost far and wide.

29.01.2025 01:24 β€” πŸ‘ 33049    πŸ” 12063    πŸ’¬ 391    πŸ“Œ 355

I see... yeah, it does sound just like Facebook: "My pictures are mine, but Meta can do whatever they want with them and my information"

17.01.2025 06:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Is the data in the cryoET data portal (built by the CZI) owned by Meta once you upload it there?

17.01.2025 01:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It is so infuriating... "yep, we saw that he is really nasty but did not want to hurt his feelings"

14.01.2025 23:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah... that would be the natural place for her, but he would not put her in the Department of Education because he promised to close it.

15.11.2024 00:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

...and wait for the announcement of Lauren Bobert as Treasury Secretary...

14.11.2024 08:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I will keep my fingers crossed for you. I have to shut down the microscopes tomorrow so that they can replace the batteries for their respective UPS units (oh, the irony!!). I will also need good vibes so that they come alive from their medically induced coma.

25.10.2023 18:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I can totally understand... at one of my previous employment sites, they also changed it to what we used to call "Schwarzenegger paper", because it was tough, rough, and would not take crap from anyone.

23.10.2023 18:38 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is kind of difficult to follow when you have an advisor who tells you things like "Why on earth did you think that was a good experiment to do?" (this hasn't happened to me, but I have seen it)

10.10.2023 15:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Only six particles per image, but looks nice over the blue sky.

03.10.2023 04:19 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I do not see anything wrong with the article. They produced vitreous ice by condensing vapor onto a cold surface (a copper pipe cooled with LN2), and they determined the glassy character of the ice by X-ray diffraction, so it was not electron microscopy, as there were no EMs at the time.

03.10.2023 03:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That drink you are having must be wonderful... LIMAO... sounds like "laughing intensely my ass off"

26.09.2023 19:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@electrons is following 19 prominent accounts