Luc Perkins's Avatar

Luc Perkins

@lucperkins.dev.bsky.social

Nix advocate @determinate.systems. Buenos Aires ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท.

407 Followers  |  241 Following  |  526 Posts  |  Joined: 23.04.2023  |  1.9763

Latest posts by lucperkins.dev on Bluesky

I'm so excited to get this out into the world

05.08.2025 14:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Go away

02.08.2025 06:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Headlights are now so bright that I as a blue-eyed person have to wear sunglasses walking around cities at night

01.08.2025 19:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ah yes, praise of exactly one project must surely indicate a broader sense of entitlement on my part

01.08.2025 11:16 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ummm, bit dramatic there?

29.07.2025 11:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

As far as voyages go, I canโ€™t say that Tbilisi to Chieti, Italy is one that Iโ€™d recommend in a single day

24.07.2025 16:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I only let myself drink Coke about once a month and let me tell you, it is the highlight of my month

23.07.2025 17:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

At the very least, restaurants should figure out some way to not let anxious dudes in motorcycle helmets staring at their phones be the dominant human aesthetic of the place

21.07.2025 18:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I feel like Google Maps, Yelp, and others need to figure out some way to mark restaurants that are just delivery thoroughfares as being such

21.07.2025 17:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Iโ€™m so deeply resentful of the ways in which food delivery has thoroughly degraded the restaurant experience

21.07.2025 17:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

โ€œYou take vinoโ€™s name outcha f***in mouth!โ€

21.07.2025 17:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

No state punches above its weight like Washington

21.07.2025 09:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Bananas are not that good

20.07.2025 06:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Did he get injured?

18.07.2025 19:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Itโ€™s an amazing learning exercise! And might even yield something useful.

18.07.2025 19:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

This one, too

18.07.2025 11:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

I canโ€™t believe you talked me into going to this hellhole

18.07.2025 10:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

503 represent!

14.07.2025 07:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Blazers legend Yang Hansen

13.07.2025 11:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
There is no such thing as liberalism โ€” or progressivism, etc.

There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Greshamโ€™s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation.

There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. โ€œThe king can do no wrong.โ€ In practice, this immunity was always extended to the kingโ€™s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the kingโ€™s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual.

As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself โ€” backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

There is no such thing as liberalism โ€” or progressivism, etc. There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Greshamโ€™s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation. There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely. Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. โ€œThe king can do no wrong.โ€ In practice, this immunity was always extended to the kingโ€™s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the kingโ€™s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual. As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself โ€” backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

Then the appearance arises that the task is to map โ€œliberalismโ€, or โ€œprogressivismโ€, or โ€œsocialismโ€, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism.

No, it aโ€™nโ€™t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get:

The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone. Then the appearance arises that the task is to map โ€œliberalismโ€, or โ€œprogressivismโ€, or โ€œsocialismโ€, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism. No, it aโ€™nโ€™t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get: The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

I think it's now possible to make a poli-sci course that equips one for modern political analysis better than most classic theory and has a syllabus sourced entirely from random internet posts.

Text 1. Wilhoit's Law, born as part of a 2018 blog comment
crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/l...

13.07.2025 01:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3531    ๐Ÿ” 1089    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 193    ๐Ÿ“Œ 232

Nothing makes me more anxious than the concept of โ€œrelaxingโ€

13.07.2025 10:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

You have to go to Stepantsminda before you die ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช

11.07.2025 09:42 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sadly my rental car contract forbids me going to Ushguli ๐Ÿ˜ญ But Mestia will be no problem.

11.07.2025 09:42 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Itโ€™s so sad that both sides of the Mtkvari river in Tbilisi are covered by highways. One of those horrid planning mistakes that is nigh impossible to recover from.

11.07.2025 09:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I love that I now feel empowered to make my own PDFs

09.07.2025 11:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
GitHub - loqusion/typix: Deterministic Typst compilation with Nix Deterministic Typst compilation with Nix. Contribute to loqusion/typix development by creating an account on GitHub.

I am now officially having way too much fun with @typst.app and I'm so amped that there's dedicated Nix machinery for it (and published on FlakeHub): github.com/loqusion/typix

09.07.2025 11:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Whenever you have a positive Venmo balance that is basically Monopoly money

06.07.2025 07:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Be strong ๐Ÿ‘Š

04.07.2025 10:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Iโ€™ve reached a phase in life called โ€œI am likely to soon be 10 years older than the mayor of NYCโ€

04.07.2025 10:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Trying to get my various 401k sums into one account has been the biggest bullshit waste of time of my entire adult life

03.07.2025 07:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@lucperkins.dev is following 20 prominent accounts