nomi

I mean, they don't actually believe in or care about the things they're saying, they're really just saying whatever stuff they think Mamdani's voters might care about.

He just doesn't want to face any personal consequences aka spine of a jellyfish.

It's just *so* much fun being trans and autistic in the world these days 🙃😑

Thanks for sharing! I mean, us late-diagnosed autistic adults can of course see that this theory is bullshit on its face. Because if paracetamol caused my child's autism, then what caused my autism? What caused my parents' autism? What caused my grandparents' autism?

Jeps, hun burde absolut have en dom for det. At hun senere undskylder gør jo på ingen måde op for den skade, det har gjort, at udbrede den slags disinformation på en kæmpestor platform.

Now who is the Michael and who is the Peter?

Kæmpe tillykke, Nadia ❤️

"Giving money to poor people isn't enough" says the people who have never given money to poor people and would not dream of doing so.

We're still calling her a swimmer? She tied for 5th with Lia Thomas some years ago when they were both college athletes, neither of them have gone on to have athletic careers post-graduation.

"Hvis du vil have børn kan du ikke være transkønnet"

"Hvis du vil anerkendes juridisk som dit køn skal du steriliseres først"

"Vi anerkender dig ikke som dit barns far/mor"

*Undlader i det stille at informere om rettigheder ift. fertilitetsbevarende tiltag*

This! Man moralsk-panikker over en framing af kønsbekræftende behandlinger som "medicinsk kastrering/sterilisering" imens man med den anden hånd nægter os fertilitet på forskellige kreative måder:

I see this so often 😵

Agreed, but.... that's what we're focusing on????

Who is this Jake Hay Rowling?

Fuck, hvor ubehageligt! Stort kram ❤️ Havde den juridiske afdeling i LGBT+ Danmark ikke et projekt ift. anmeldelse af had og chikane, hvor de bl.a. (som jeg forstod det) har mulighed for at støtte ift. anmeldelse + presse på ift. at få det taget alvorligt? For det der er meget groft, synes jeg.

So in other words, the number of people is not the problem.... like I've been saying. It's the rich countries that are the problem.

It's really just another neat trick to pay people less 🤷🏼‍♂️🙃

you obviously still need a translator's skill set for the results to be any good, and it's not much faster, but the pay is much less and you no longer have a copyright over the translation, so you won't get paid for reprints, library use etc.

Aside from energy use, I think the really big issue is that it's currently getting used by employers as a tool to slash wages. On the generative text side, I'm seeing a lot of translation jobs etc. getting reframed as AI editors -

And most importantly, it says nothing at all about how many resources go into the food production in relation to the production of clothing, electronics, consumer goods or the transportation sector.

Also, using one piece of statistic is close to meaningless: it doesn't say anything at all about where the food production is, who is benefiting from the food that is produced, how much goes to waste etc.

You're seriously using AI in this thread about the earth drying out? I see why it's very convenient for you personally to just point the finger at some brown people 🙃🤷🏼‍♂️🙃🤷🏼‍♂️

It's just not correct that the problem food production for too many people. The vast majority of planetary ressouces are used by industry feeding the overconsumption of rich countries, not food production.

World Athletics’ mandatory genetic test for women athletes is misguided. I should know – I discovered the relevant gene in 1990 World Athletics says its genetic test for women ensures ‘the integrity of women’s sport’ – but science does not support this overly simplistic idea.

"World Athletics’ mandatory genetic test for women athletes is misguided. I should know – I discovered the relevant gene in 1990"

Professor Andrew Sinclair, Murdoch Children's Research Institute

Makes sense!

It is *not* the number of people that is the problem.

Lidt mere foder til din klimaangst.

I feel like this is something lots of left wing *women* have written about for years, it's just that on the whole they're not interested in listening to women 🤷🏼‍♂️

Or somebody who tells them it's ok or "natural" or whatever to be r🍇pey...

Aj Nadia, transkvinder har jo flere fast-twitch muskefibre og en mindre q-vinkel, ved du vel nok? 🙃🙄🙃🙄