Thank you! Will you post or analyse the results of each of these elections?
02.12.2025 21:35 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@olton-mike.bsky.social
Lib Dem fighting against social and economic conservatism and other nonsense in power. Loves Musicals, Pokรฉmon and self improvement ๐ณ๏ธโ๐๐ณ๏ธโโง๏ธ
Thank you! Will you post or analyse the results of each of these elections?
02.12.2025 21:35 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I go out of my way to buy recycled toilet roll but itโs hard to find in many supermarkets. Andrex puppies have a large monopoly.
01.12.2025 12:23 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Good morning to Brazilian reporter Manuela Borges, whoโs been waiting eleven years for this petty moment. โค๏ธ ๐ง๐ท
26.11.2025 13:04 โ ๐ 56257 ๐ 14981 ๐ฌ 832 ๐ 1976BREAKING: This is huge news, the EU's equivalent of the ๐บ๐ธSupreme Court's 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling.
๐ช๐บCourt of Justice just ruled all ๐ช๐บcountries must recognise same-sex marriages granted in other member states.
This effectively legalises gay marriage across ๐ช๐บ
I would recommend listening to โLive To Liveโ on the Hazbin Hotel season 2 soundtrack as I think that answers quite a few questions about this if youโre feeling hopeless about it. And then also the first 20 seconds of Here my Hope to avoid spoilers
21.11.2025 14:27 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I would recommend listening to โLive To Liveโ on the Hazbin Hotel season 2 soundtrack as I think that answers quite a few questions about this if youโre feeling hopeless about it.
21.11.2025 14:26 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Only 3 votes in it!
21.11.2025 12:16 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 03 votes
21.11.2025 12:06 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Reform won by 3 votes if youโve ever thought your vote doesnโt count before then it certainly does!
21.11.2025 12:05 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I thought the ending was beautiful and it made me cry.
21.11.2025 10:13 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This is very unlikely as Transphobia doesnโt tend to swing an election. It all depends on how organised each local party is and we saw that Trafford conservatives were more organised than many other local parties as they gained a seat from labour last month too.
21.11.2025 01:23 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0@craigburley.com @thatelizabeth.bsky.social Did you guys get washed or deserved to lose here?
21.11.2025 00:45 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I need to process that but I wanna give Viv and the whole team a huge round of applause!!! ๐
That whole finale was the sickest thing Iโve ever seen
Thatโs essential infrastructure that will allow us to stop relying on fossil fuels as much. In the long term it will be very beneficial to the area bringing thousands of jobs and loads of energy without air pollution to the UK.
14.11.2025 20:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0People never want change initially even if itโs beneficial in the long term.The choice for local parties is to oppose it for short term gain for them but long term pain for the people going without the jobs or houses new developments bring.
Iโm happy they took the unpopular choice for the long term
NIMBY campaigns are almost always short term gain for long term pain. Iโm not involved in this local party. Iโm saying itโs not a moral victory to oppose a development that would benefit the community in the long term with more jobs. All parties are guilty of this sometimes.
14.11.2025 14:34 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm not saying it wasnโt with the residents and the vote collapsed because the Lib Dems didnโt campaign just like the greens didnโt in Spelthorne or Devon when we gained seats from them recently. Residents are against change initially but get used to it over time and will enjoy the benefits of it.
14.11.2025 14:28 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Itโs not sour grapes Iโm explaining how the Greens won by opposition to something that will bring jobs and growth to the area. The Lib Dems didnโt do anything to win this seat just like the greens didnโt in Spelthorne or Devon when we gained seats from them over the past few weeks.
14.11.2025 14:26 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I said it like that because I canโt speak for the whole Lib Dem party though most would agree with me.
14.11.2025 14:03 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The problem with the Green party in a nutshell - they arenโt green.
14.11.2025 14:02 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The bold action for huge housing costs is to build more housing everywhere!
The bold action to reduce energy costs is to build more renewable energy everywhere!
Your party is making both of these more difficult and expensive by not looking at the science or thinking long term! You are blocking it!
Green fields arenโt green if theyโre industrial farmland. Solar farms can also be built while livestock or crops can grow underneath them as multi use.
14.11.2025 13:59 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yes so your party agrees with me on that but the problem is that youโre so averse to using one natural desert field to build housing, businesses or solar farms on when if you did that and then rewilded another nearby field it would be much better for nature than leaving 2 natural desert fields.
14.11.2025 13:56 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Itโs much better than nothing, all homes help the housing ladder because older families move into larger houses, freeing up smaller houses for younger families. We should have more dense affordable brownfield housing but if there is a green Cllr in that area theyโre probably against that too.
14.11.2025 13:53 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0We have 80% of our countryside in this country left. Most of it is industrial farmland which holds no natural areas other than hedgerows and woods dotted around here and there. If you want to help nature you need rewilding of farmers fields which is possible and something that should be pursued.
14.11.2025 13:50 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0At the moment it is nuclear vs fossil fuels until the renewable technology is developed in future that makes it possible to produce as much energy as nuclear or fossil fuels.
And your party keep making renewable energy harder to build and more expensive because you donโt want it near you!
Lib Dem MPs have already introduced a bill that the government picked up and made sure that all new build homes will have solar panels on by 2026.
You have to think in the long term. Building nuclear in the long term helps nature because we donโt have the air pollution from oil and gas burning.
Yes because they need water and โchanging the character of an areaโ is what happened in all cities and new towns which used to be fields and forests and Iโm sure people donโt want to knock them all down. Building them reduces pollution from fossil fuels and they produce far less than they do.
14.11.2025 13:39 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Nuclear is the only viable alternative to the use of imported oil and gas until we can build loads of solar farms wind farms and pylons that your party is blocking. They are much safer and green ideological opposition to them just boosts fossil fuels. France has loads of them and they work well.
14.11.2025 13:35 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0All youโre doing is increasing the costs of those things and making them far less viable. There is such a huge amount of industrial farmland that is used just to feed livestock and are deserts for nature. 20% of the UK is built on. You are helping fossil fuels by making these projects cost so much!
14.11.2025 13:30 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0