David Boetius's Avatar

David Boetius

@davidboe.bsky.social

33 Followers  |  150 Following  |  44 Posts  |  Joined: 04.05.2025  |  1.8446

Latest posts by davidboe.bsky.social on Bluesky

โ€žHypotheses that retreat before each new success, always predicting failure just beyond current achievements, are not compelling scientific theories, but a dogmatic commitment to perpetual scepticism.โ€œ

Well said ๐Ÿ‘

03.02.2026 21:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The current anti-AI-capabilities take is something like, โ€œsure itโ€™s useful for software engineering, but not tasks that require *real* intelligenceโ€

29.01.2026 19:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 108    ๐Ÿ” 7    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 13    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Need courtesy advice: Is it adequate to interrupt a coding agent, and what is the preferred way to proceed when unintentionally interrupting one?

13.01.2026 22:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But I guess I can take this if the content is really good. Don't know yet in this case.

12.12.2025 19:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Screenshot of ChatGPT output: "7. Evaluation (business-relevant)"

Screenshot of ChatGPT output: "7. Evaluation (business-relevant)"

My very superficial impression of ChatGPT 5.2: so cringe ๐Ÿ˜“

I asked it for a training recipe for an academic tabular dataset from the UCI repository. It tells me: "Evaluation (business relevant)"

I can't take this style of anymore ๐Ÿ˜‚

12.12.2025 19:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I just used codex to write a few test cases for a data structure. On inspecting the code it found a pretty obvious bug in what I wrote and continued to write the tests so that they *donโ€˜t* fail despite this bug. Wild decision making ๐Ÿค”

05.12.2025 16:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

As long as itโ€˜s on a leash Iโ€˜m ok with it

05.12.2025 16:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Let's make the 2-3 tree the 6 7 of computer science

04.12.2025 18:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

๐Ÿ’ฏ

03.12.2025 13:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Why not?

Blinding peer review, grant proposal review, etc. makes a lot of sense as to even the ground field given the difference pace around the globe.

I'm from ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด which might rank in top for corruption. We may have improved as we call it clientelism or politics. Science is not immune to politics

29.11.2025 13:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Post image

Oof

28.11.2025 14:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 18    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Oof indeed

28.11.2025 15:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Handing back student work thatโ€™s been written by ChatGPT with a 0 followed by the comment โ€œThis essay will never stand in authentic wonder before the Beauty of Godโ€™s creation.โ€

26.11.2025 15:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 9609    ๐Ÿ” 2628    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 21    ๐Ÿ“Œ 49
Post image

I believe eigen fly. I believe eigen touch the sky.

26.11.2025 16:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 244    ๐Ÿ” 43    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 4

It should be named the cat problem and the owner problem(s).

19.11.2025 19:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Python has this as well (the Walrus operator, mentioned before) and I have never seen it used.

if (val := 10) == 10:
print(val)

11.11.2025 18:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ah! learning and meta-learning

18.10.2025 05:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
A user demonstrates position-orientation motions, which lie on a Riemannian manifold. Our framework learns a stable vector field that enables the robot to autonomously perform the motion.

A user demonstrates position-orientation motions, which lie on a Riemannian manifold. Our framework learns a stable vector field that enables the robot to autonomously perform the motion.

Need to ensure stability of your neural ODE, but on a Riemannian manifold? ๐Ÿค” Worry no more! Our latest paper has you covered: robot-learning-control-lab.github.io/snmode-proje...

09.10.2025 16:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Cool paper on probabilistic verification using neuron splitting branch and bound! Uses Monte Carlo estimates of probabilities instead of computing the exact probabilities. IMO this is the main driver of the efficiency gain, as neuron splitting is too costly without it (previous works tried).

02.10.2025 14:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Juan Ramirez, Simon Lacoste-Julien: Dual Optimistic Ascent (PI Control) is the Augmented Lagrangian Method in Disguise https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22500 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.22500 https://arxiv.org/html/2509.22500

29.09.2025 06:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sorry to hear that you see yourself as a fractured (twice), Opus

24.09.2025 17:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Lyapunov maybe

19.09.2025 16:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
ChatGPT 5 Instant v
โ‘  Share
โ€ข โ€ขโ€ข
this guy just messaged me to "hop on a quick call" how long are those supposed to last typically??
A "quick call" can last anywhere from 5 minutes to 2-4 months.
Some quick calls have even been going on since the early 1900s, with ancestors continuing the conversation to loop in key stakeholders and ensure cross-generational synergies with a warm handoff.
But this would be a lot easier to explain over voice mode - do you have 5 minutes to hop on a call?

ChatGPT 5 Instant v โ‘  Share โ€ข โ€ขโ€ข this guy just messaged me to "hop on a quick call" how long are those supposed to last typically?? A "quick call" can last anywhere from 5 minutes to 2-4 months. Some quick calls have even been going on since the early 1900s, with ancestors continuing the conversation to loop in key stakeholders and ensure cross-generational synergies with a warm handoff. But this would be a lot easier to explain over voice mode - do you have 5 minutes to hop on a call?

whoah, TIL

19.09.2025 13:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 128    ๐Ÿ” 14    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Signal notification: โ€žyou may have new messagesโ€œ

Signal notification: โ€žyou may have new messagesโ€œ

You may or my not have new messages

17.09.2025 10:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Props to the person doing some actual work on this Saturday by mowing the overgrown lawn in front of my office while I sit at my desk

13.09.2025 11:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Also, my first take would be that suffering requires some feedback from the โ€žhardwareโ€œ youโ€™re running on if pain and emotions can be described that way

13.09.2025 09:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

To what extent do you think apps that simulate historical figures using AI do create something like AI Clark?

13.09.2025 09:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Good news! According to our weekly lab poll the internet wasnโ€™t dead last week. ๐Ÿ“ˆ But with only two votes. 2๏ธโƒฃ

13.09.2025 09:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Just submitted the manuscript for the 2nd edition of Swarm Robotics: A Formal Approach ๐ŸŽ‰

โœ… ~2ร— the size
โœ… fully updated with latest research
โœ… ready4the breakthrough years ahead

Thanks to all who supported! Now in productionโ€”stay tuned.

Now it's in production โ€“ stay tuned.

#swarm #robotics #book

09.09.2025 07:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It will be: โ€žhow does group X fix a flickering LEDโ€œ

05.09.2025 13:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@davidboe is following 20 prominent accounts