Have examples of social science papers that use DAGs to justify their controls? I find these very hard to come by & would like to use for teaching.
02.03.2026 13:58 β π 9 π 3 π¬ 3 π 2Have examples of social science papers that use DAGs to justify their controls? I find these very hard to come by & would like to use for teaching.
02.03.2026 13:58 β π 9 π 3 π¬ 3 π 2Hello all! Iβm recruiting a postdoc to work with my lab and I on methods for analyzing intensive longitudinal timeseries of psychological phenomena, with particular focus on measurement and optimization of interventions! Start would be August 2026
15.01.2026 15:26 β π 5 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0
π’ Call for Papers:
Weβre excited to announce an upcoming Psychometrika Special Issue on Data Intensive Methods in Psychometrics (think of using many datasets for methodological development), guest edited by @klint.bsky.social, @kyliegorney.bsky.social, @jmbh.bsky.social, Ben Domingue, and me.
Which is why assumptions you can check aren't very helpful: if an assumption doesn't cost anything it won't buy much
08.01.2026 17:32 β π 20 π 6 π¬ 2 π 3
After 5 years of data collection, our WARN-D machine learning competition to forecast depression onset is now LIVE! We hope many of you will participateβwe have incredibly rich data.
If you share a single thing of my lab this year, please make it this competition.
eiko-fried.com/warn-d-machi...
Call for papers: Emotion special issue on Affect Dynamics Across Multiple Timescales (momentsβdaysβyears) and links to mental and physical health. Letters of intent due Jan 15, 2026. Details/submission:
www.apa.org/pubs/journal...
Please share with colleagues/trainees. @affectscience.bsky.social
Diederik Stapel was a massive watershed moment in psychology.
However, he was -- and let's be slightly glib here -- some guy from The Netherlands who wrote social psychology papers.
The full accounting of the Eysenck case is approx, at minimum, TWO STAPELS.
retractionwatch.com/2025/12/03/n...
Come work with us @unm.edu π€©
07.11.2025 18:39 β π 9 π 9 π¬ 0 π 0
I'm hiring (another) post doc, this time in collaboration with Natalie Brito @nataliebrito.bsky.social at Columbia! We will be exploring some of the characteristics of human development using deep learning models. Email with questions!
iaejup.fa.ocs.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/Candid...
New job ad: Assistant Professor of Quantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College apply.interfolio.com/172357
Please share with your networks. I am the search chair and happy to answer questions!
Interesting new special issue in Psychological Assessment.
Edited by Kristin Naragon-Gainey and @kstanton.bsky.social
Here's their overview paper: psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...
And here's our contribution, which will win us no friends:
psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...
Happy to share that our large-scale network analysis is now out in @nathumbehav.nature.com
We show that networks are often supported by too little evidence from the data for results to be reported with confidence, not meaning that results are flawed but rather suggests caution in interpretation.
Great study! A general implication is that when we infer effects of retrospectively measure variables on outcomes, weβre largely just seeing the effects of how people are currently feeling.
14.10.2025 15:26 β π 29 π 9 π¬ 1 π 0Wow, congrats!
17.09.2025 21:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Rethinking measurement invariance causally Highlights: It is preferable to work with a causal definition of measurement invariance A violation of measurement invariance is a potentially substantively interesting observation Standard tests for measurement invariance rely on strong assumptions Group differences can be thought of as descriptive results
Conceptual graph illustration the central points of the manuscript. A group variable is potentiall connected to a construct of interest which affects items. Measurement invariance is violated if the group variable directly affects the items, for example by modifying the loadings from the construct to the items, or by directly affecting an item
To make this less abstract, consider a scenario where students take an exam, R, meant to capture some ability, T, and then are admitted to a program, V, depending on their exam results: Rβ―ββ―V. This is sufficient to result in a violation of the statistical definition of measurement invariance. Exam results and admission are not independent given ability because exam results have a direct effect on admission. Even if we know somebodyβs ability (e.g., we know itβs very high), learning about their admission status (e.g., they were not admitted) can tell us something about their exam result (e.g., it may have been worse than expected). According to the causal definition, this in itself does not constitute measurement bias, which seems a sensible conclusion here. After all, the scenario does not involve any reason to believe that the measurement process varied systematically by admission status. Admission happens after the exams took place, it cannot retroactively influence the measurement process (and, for example, lead to unfair treatment depending on admission status).
New paper out with @boryslaw.bsky.social π₯³ In which we sketch out how to rethink measurement invariance causally for applied researchers. And provide a causal definition of measurement invariance!
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Tenure-Track Quant Psyc job opening at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff. Areas of interest are pretty broad (SEM, multilevel, or psychometrics), the deadline to apply is coming up soon (Sept 15) if you're interested!
careers.nau.edu/jobs/assista...
AMPPS Call for Papers: Replicability and Reproducibility in Methodological Research. Proposals due September 15. @jkflake.bsky.socialΒ
Please add me.
02.07.2025 18:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Great post! I just read this paper by @drewhalbailey.bsky.social and colleagues that shows the RI-CLPM also performs better than CLPM when there are unmeasured time-varying confounders:
psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-...
This work was officially accepted for publication today!
12.06.2025 21:24 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0This is a required reading in my Intro to Research Methods class.
04.06.2025 18:37 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Love it!
12.05.2025 22:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Figure 1. Trends in Biannual US Infant Mortality Rates, 2012-2023
π§΅ US states that implemented abortion bans saw higher than expected infant mortality rates, with larger increases among Black infants and those in southern states, according to this analysis of US national vital statistics data from 2012β2023.
ja.ma/4aVchPn
#MedSky
π
15.02.2025 03:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Are psychometric networks sufficiently supported by data such that one can be confident when interpreting its results? We analysed 294 psychometric networks from 126 papers with the Bayesian approach to address this question @jmbh.bsky.social Sara Ruth van Holst @maartenmarsman.bsky.social π§΅
24.01.2025 11:02 β π 51 π 16 π¬ 1 π 2I donβt know if itβs an addition, but drinking too much milk tea (aka bubble tea, which is not just milk and tea but usually high in sugar) is a common problem in Chinese teenagers and a legitimate public health concern. Itβs the same problem that Americans have with soda.
23.01.2025 19:01 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
7 steps to junk science that can achieve worldly success
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/01/17/7...
Itβs fascinating to watch the exchanges between βTikTok refugeesβ and Chinese netizens on Rednote (Xiaohongshu)! Never imagined the βwallβ would start to collapse in this way. Now I just worry that Rednote will get banned here if it becomes too popularπ
17.01.2025 22:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0