Charlie Schaezlein's Avatar

Charlie Schaezlein

@cschaez.bsky.social

Internet person

32 Followers  |  177 Following  |  25 Posts  |  Joined: 23.05.2023  |  2.0311

Latest posts by cschaez.bsky.social on Bluesky

Is this not just a normal custom store? Like look up Anker, etc

03.04.2025 22:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 03.04.2025 16:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Uh, that last line is very bad.

01.04.2025 02:51 β€” πŸ‘ 68    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 1

Really holocausty vibes

27.03.2025 00:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Really testing my commitment to my β€œI trust my ex-ante diversification plans and do not look at my 401k” bit 🫠

26.03.2025 18:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Section 230 reform will give government and private pressure groups more power over speech rules.

Understood that many folks do not trust private companies to do this.

But there are absolutely scenarios that are much worse than the current situation. This bill makes them much more likely.

21.03.2025 19:35 β€” πŸ‘ 27    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

Honestly needed this joy today

19.03.2025 23:56 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@cartoonshateher.bsky.social Sisson take when??????? I keep refreshing all your feeds why are you depriving us

19.03.2025 18:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Would you like to hire a fake PhD for $240,000/year that makes so many mistakes that you also need human PhDs for each relevant subject area to double-check everything they do?

Well do we have the product for you!

05.03.2025 18:35 β€” πŸ‘ 351    πŸ” 63    πŸ’¬ 15    πŸ“Œ 1

We are, unequivocally, the Bad Guys.

We have been before, and we will be again, no doubt, but this one is particularly repellent.

24.02.2025 19:48 β€” πŸ‘ 4160    πŸ” 811    πŸ’¬ 88    πŸ“Œ 15

Mate it’s β€œdon’t tell the cops anything so you don’t incriminate yourself” not β€œdon’t say mean things”

21.02.2025 06:00 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Can we do a better job with this tho? High speed rail is already hard, our policies on building anything are insane

21.02.2025 01:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Even a reality-TV squirrel will occasionally find a nut. The rail project has been the subject of reasonable criticism.

The administration’s attack on it isn’t sincere, but isn’t necessarily wrong.

20.02.2025 18:57 β€” πŸ‘ 316    πŸ” 33    πŸ’¬ 43    πŸ“Œ 2

why am i upset the screenshot references HIPPA, not HIPAA

12.02.2025 23:15 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How dare they!

30.01.2025 19:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In the nicest way possible, are you a renowned 1a litigator? I thought you were merely a good and practicing one who was primarily known for your commentary

30.01.2025 19:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Nixon goes to china imo and trump wins in a landslide :/ but ex post he should have played harder ball

15.01.2025 17:57 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You’re not wrong but Netanyahu clearly stonewalled until trump was calling the shots.

15.01.2025 17:50 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The point of statistics is to be better at it than your enemies, not to be good at it

19.12.2024 18:20 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is there precedent for this? Not being an expert the wapo editorial felt reasonable, what context might help?

17.11.2024 18:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Inside Big Tech’s Bid to Sink the Online Kid Safety Bill Tech giants and their allies are leaning on culture-war issues to splinter bipartisan support for the bill.

This piece the Kids Online Safety Act is journalistic malpractice.

Yes, of course Big Tech lobbied against the bill. That's what they do

But the primary opposition to KOSA came from frontlines LGBTQ orgs and youth. This piece completely ignores the legitimate opposition www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

17.11.2024 14:58 β€” πŸ‘ 144    πŸ” 49    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

This was me the day after the election. It’ll burn out of your system quick

13.11.2024 04:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I assume Halloween?

19.07.2023 03:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Castle doctrine

19.07.2023 03:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I feel like this is specifically directed at the hat

06.07.2023 02:34 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

That you can do this with the line item veto as it exists in Wisconsin is absolutely bananas https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2023/07/05/tony-evers-extends-increases-for-public-schools-in-perpetuity/70381898007/

05.07.2023 23:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

🫑🫑🫑🫑

05.07.2023 03:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Where did you get those symbol keycaps??

03.07.2023 20:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I was under the impression it was actually pretty good in the mountains etc?

02.07.2023 22:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@cschaez is following 20 prominent accounts